Is it right to let the assault weapons ban expire?
Yes 25% 2127 votes
No 75% 6521 Votes
Get to work!
September 12, 2004, 08:32 PM
Nahh the Communist News Network would never do that:rolleyes: :rolleyes: ya right
September 12, 2004, 08:40 PM
The poll has been up for about an hour.
We'll catch up when everyon gets back from dinner or the range.
Just to be sure... BTT. :D
September 12, 2004, 08:41 PM
I think it's rigged. I voted yes and it still read the same 2127 yes votes
September 12, 2004, 08:48 PM
I voted as well and it did not register my vote. Oh well...
September 12, 2004, 09:01 PM
here's another sickening article... http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/10/assault.weapons.ban/index.html In the first article DragonRider posted, A guy is holding a Mini-14 and the caption is "Gunsmith Justin Davis holds a Ruger mini-14 rifle, illegal to manufacture under the assault weapons ban." Idiots.
September 12, 2004, 09:05 PM
It also says that ten round mags were illegal during the ban...
September 12, 2004, 09:12 PM
Its registering at least some votes...now up to:
3990, yes, letting the ban exipre is the right thing.
11698 no, letting the ban expire is wrong.
still 25% to 75%, but the numbers are higher.
Could it be that more liberals visit CNN.com? Either way, we need to hit this harder!
September 12, 2004, 09:20 PM
A guy is holding a Mini-14 and the caption is "Gunsmith Justin Davis holds a Ruger mini-14 rifle, illegal to manufacture under the assault weapons ban." Idiots.
Guess the one i boguht brand new in the ruger box around 2000 wasn't legal to buy from the gun shop that was connected to the constables office?
btw - still 25/75 - 4424/12948
If you enjoyed reading about "CNN AWB Pole Vote Now" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!