W Turner
September 26, 2004, 11:43 PM
A few months ago I traded for a CZ P01. I love shooting this gun (never thought I would say that about a traditional DA/SA), but I hate carrying it (the main reason i bought it).
I am using a quality belt slide form FIST and a good stiff belt (either Aker or Safariland), but it is just too thick for me to feel comfortable with how I conceal it in OWB carry. IWB carry is uncomfortable due to the thicker alloy receiver and accessory rail of this model.
I had decided to sell this in favor of a SW Sc1911 that I had found at a local shop or trade for a Glock 19/23. I posted it here and on glocktalk and got very little interest, but did receive a trade offer for a Kahr K40.
Here are my thoughts....
1- The Kahr is much thinner, which is the main reason I don't like carrying the CZ.
2- 9mm? .40? .45? They'll all do the part if I do mine, so caliber is not an issue.
3- Everytime I have held/looked at a Kahr pistol, the grip always "felt" too small for my hands, which are very large. The only one I have ever shot (K9), I liked.
4- Weight is a wash as the smaller size overall of the all-stainless K40 offsets the fact that the CZ has an alloy frame.
5- Where to find less expensive Kahr mags ($40 for a single stack 6-7 rd. mag from the mfr. ?), as the Kahr only comes with 1 mag.
To add confusion to this, I am also not a huge proponent of any particular action style (C'N'L carry, DAO, Safe_action, etc.) other than not typically liking DA/SA guns. I seem to shoot equally well with all of them
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
W
I am using a quality belt slide form FIST and a good stiff belt (either Aker or Safariland), but it is just too thick for me to feel comfortable with how I conceal it in OWB carry. IWB carry is uncomfortable due to the thicker alloy receiver and accessory rail of this model.
I had decided to sell this in favor of a SW Sc1911 that I had found at a local shop or trade for a Glock 19/23. I posted it here and on glocktalk and got very little interest, but did receive a trade offer for a Kahr K40.
Here are my thoughts....
1- The Kahr is much thinner, which is the main reason I don't like carrying the CZ.
2- 9mm? .40? .45? They'll all do the part if I do mine, so caliber is not an issue.
3- Everytime I have held/looked at a Kahr pistol, the grip always "felt" too small for my hands, which are very large. The only one I have ever shot (K9), I liked.
4- Weight is a wash as the smaller size overall of the all-stainless K40 offsets the fact that the CZ has an alloy frame.
5- Where to find less expensive Kahr mags ($40 for a single stack 6-7 rd. mag from the mfr. ?), as the Kahr only comes with 1 mag.
To add confusion to this, I am also not a huge proponent of any particular action style (C'N'L carry, DAO, Safe_action, etc.) other than not typically liking DA/SA guns. I seem to shoot equally well with all of them
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
W