.280 Rem. vs. 7mm Rem. Mag.?


PDA






SADshooter
November 18, 2004, 07:08 PM
I have a SIG SHR970 chambered in 7mm Rem. Mag. I bought it from a good friend, now deceased (RIP, Ray), in a cash crunch. I really like the rifle, but I think I'm a recoil sissy. Factory 7mms (e.g. Winchester 140gr. Ballistic Silvertips) cause me to flinch. Not horribly, but enough to cause concern for my offhand hunting accuracy, which is the rifle's purpose. I put a Leupold on it, intending this to be my primary hunting rifle for small/medium game out to medium ranges.

I've thought about a caliber swap in this rifle, but accessories are hard to find. So, I find that CDNN has non-magnum bolts and magazines, and .280 Rem. barrels at what seem like reasonable prices, but I haven't found barrels in any other calibers.

So, would a .280 offer a sufficiently substantial recoil reduction to make the whole exercise worthwhile? I know the cartridge is based on the '06, and is respectable in its own right. Is it a significantly softer-shooting 7mm?

Thanks,

If you enjoyed reading about ".280 Rem. vs. 7mm Rem. Mag.?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Mike128
November 18, 2004, 07:20 PM
What kind of recoil pad does it have on it? Getting a good recoil pad can help a lot. I recommend Sims or a Pachmyer Decelerator.
If you want a 280 it's pretty much like an 30-06 in recoil with same weight bullets. If you can handle a 30-06 with 180 grain you should be able to handle a 7 rem mag in 140 grains. (At least they seem similiar to me.) A 280 with 140 grains bullets should be a OK. With my 7 rem mag I do need to step back every few rounds to keep myself from flinching. Recoil is subjective so take my advice with a grain of salt. If you don't already have a good recoil pad that would be my first step.

roo_ster
November 18, 2004, 07:30 PM
How about 7mm Mauser? You can load it mild or wild.

BusMaster007
November 18, 2004, 08:01 PM
Try Remington's reduced recoil ammuniton before you spend money on anything else.
It could be that this ammo will be enough of a reduction in recoil to make you love that 7mm Mag you got from your friend.
I LOVE my Remington 700 / 7mm Rem.Mag.!
Good Luck.
Think of your buddy next time you're out shooting! :)

rbernie
November 18, 2004, 09:56 PM
Why drop down in case capacity when you can just download what you've got (but maintain the ability to use the full-power stuff)? Sounds like it's time to start handloading.....

Vern Humphrey
November 18, 2004, 10:47 PM
A .280 Remington max load will give you almost exactly the same velocity as a 7mm Magnum starting load.

The simplest and cheapest way to solve your problem is to get a handloading set (the Lee Handpress Set is a good buy, and very versatile) and load 7mm Mags to starting load levels.

SADshooter
November 19, 2004, 10:58 AM
Thanks, guys.

The rifle is stock, with SIG's synthetic stock/rubber buttpad. A little more info: I've got rifles in .223 (AR), .243 (Rem. 700) .308(M1A/FR8) and .44 Mag. (Rossi 92). I don't find any of those problematic re: recoil. Just something about blast & thump in that 7mm. My wife has a Rem.700 in 7mm Mauser which is pleasant to shoot (but she'll be hunting with that this season :) )

My vision is not so good (the Leupold 3x9x40 on my .243 wouldn't let me tell spike from doe at 125 yds.) so I seriously up-scoped the SIG to a 6.5x20, which works for me.

I have a single-stage press & dies (inherited after Ray's passing) but I haven't had the space/nerve to try reloading.

I'll try the reduced recoil stuff BusMaster007 suggested, or possibly put the scope on my M1A to get by with. It just seemed like having 2 rifles in 1 was a neat idea, I just can't find a suitable caliber barrel.

If you enjoyed reading about ".280 Rem. vs. 7mm Rem. Mag.?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!