9X18 Mak
45R
February 28, 2003, 02:37 PM
I've been tettering with the though of picking up a Bulgarian Mak.
What are the pros and cons of this baby?
I'm looking mostly for accuracy and reliablity.
If you enjoyed reading about "9X18 Mak" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Correia
February 28, 2003, 02:41 PM
Very accurate for its size. However the sights are small.
My Bulgarian has been extreamly reliable. I had a handful of malfunctions when I first used it, but it has been 100% over the last 2 years.
Trigger pull is DA. Not bad. Safety can be a bit stiff at first but becomes easier to use after a little bit. (Down to fire is so much nicer than Smith/Beretta up to fire).
Field strips in seconds.
Heel clip mag release is slower, but once again, it is a pocket gun.
I have heard some people complain about the recoil, but I find it to be a very mild gun.
I love my Bulgie. Best $120 gun out there. :)
Stephen A. Camp
February 28, 2003, 02:43 PM
Hello. A time back I bought a new, commercial Bulgarian Makarov for about $150 and then spent that amount again for the "Beast" slide, which was simply a new Bulgarian slide with Novak fixed sights added. The slide is then matte blued. To many, this didn't make sense, but I simply couldn't use the tiny sights that came on the pistol, although I could tell it would group.
The Pistol: Other than the slide w/sights and a Wolff conventional 19lb recoil spring rather than the factory 17 lb, the gun's stock. The pistol came with the rubber stocks, but had the plastic ones in the package as well. I believe that the rubber stocks are by Pearce.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid31/p8ef606d36ce1fae16b6f05652f614835/fd4e4be9.jpg
"Beast" slide front sight.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid31/p3cb30aab34c56295629e609d8a43121e/fd4e4d21.jpg
Rear sight.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid31/pa7f60d999e3422e202430c8235918493/fd4e4d1e.jpg
From the top.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid31/p23f3de39920cc6fb5904376748d78ffe/fd4e4d18.jpg
No action work has been done on the pistol and while smooth, the DA pull is heavier and the SA pull breaks surprisingly clean.
Ammunition Used:
?LVE "Makarov" 6 G ball, which I assume is about 95 grains. (1043 ft/sec)
Fiocchi 95 gr FMJ (1018 ft/sec)
Corbon +P 95 gr JHP (1098 ft/sec)
Hornady 95 gr XTP (937 ft/sec)
(The figures in italics are the averaged 10-shot velocities chronographed from this pistol @ 10 ft.)
Shooting: Let's just get this out of the way up front; there were zero malfunctions with any of the ammunition tried and the gun shoot much, much better than I expected.
The two bullseye targets on the left were fired standing w/2-hand hold at 10 yards and were all fired single-action. 15 rounds were fired at each. The top round is the "LVE" ball while the lower is the Fiocchi ball. The B27 center at the right was also fired at 10 yards and consisted of single-action singles fired as quickly as a sight picture could be obtained and the trigger pressed. "LVE" was used on the B27 target.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid31/pfce98ad4837e00c0fe127f247dfa7b94/fd4e4e03.jpg
However, this pistol does not allow for Condition One "cocked & locked" carry so I fired 10 rnds the same way as above, but double-action.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid31/pd03960b5771abddeddc27f1358797a92/fd4e4e71.jpg
I was very surprised at the results considering that while smooth, the DA pull is long.
It became obvious, that I'd underestimated this gun's capabilities as I'd chosen 10 yards for the test distance rather than the usual 15, 25, and 50 yard ranges.
Below is a 25 yard target fired with the same "LVE" ammunition. It was fired standing w/2-hand hold and consists of 20 shots.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid31/p3763e650c8549613dab713ee301e8817/fd4e4e02.jpg
With the JHPs (Corbon and Hornady), only 5-shot groups were fired @ 10 yards. Didn't have much of the stuff.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid31/pc9e678cbdc044b53e96238d601ef1de2/fd4e4ce9.jpg
Either groups fine, but so has everything else so far!
Observations: The gun "shoots." This was my first "serious" efforts with this pistol and I was more than a little pleasantly surprised.
Though not a first-choice for defensive purposes, it is in the same general class as some of the .38 Special loads fired from 2" snubs and I find the heavy-for-caliber Makarov pistol much more fun to shoot than my S&W airweight snubs. It's easier to hit with as well.
Even though there are several 9x19mm pistols that are smaller as well as lighter, the Makarov is a reliable, accurate pistol that could serve for defensive use if called upon.
For me, I see it as a plinker and fun gun that is inexpensive, but not "cheap."
Best.
45R
February 28, 2003, 02:52 PM
You guys are awesome that was a fast response!!!
45R
gumshoe4
February 28, 2003, 05:39 PM
Hey 45R-I had a Russian Mak awhile ago; very nice pistol. Currently have a PA-63 in 9mm Mak which I will bring to the next Sacto area shoot and let you try out.
Mr. Camp has done his usual fabulous job on wringing out different guns and giving us the straight skinny.
Maks are cool.
Bob
TFL# 8032
Missouri Mule
February 28, 2003, 10:07 PM
My twin Circle 10 Makarovs will be among the very last to go if i am ever forced to liquidate my guns.
They ain't a 1911 and they ain't a .45acp, but they are GREAT in there own right. I like em a lot.
makdaddy03
February 28, 2003, 10:34 PM
Accuracy and Reliability? You have chosen the right handgun.
If you enjoyed reading about "9X18 Mak" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.