[Ebbtide]

Okay, whats the angle?

http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/69808.htm

March 3, 2003 -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton "fully supports" President Bush's Iraq policy, her office said last night - on the eve of her visit today to an upstate arsenal that makes military hardware like mortars and howitzers for U.S. troops.
"Sen. Clinton fully supports the steps the president has taken to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction," said Clinton spokesman Philippe Reines.

That puts Clinton (D-N.Y.) squarely at odds with a majority in her own party, where one recent poll found an Iraq attack is opposed by 66 percent of "core Democrats."

The statement comes after months where Clinton - who voted for an Iraq attack last fall - has low-keyed her support and sharply criticized aspects of Bush's security policy, sparking speculation she was trying to have it both ways.



A month ago, she sent a letter to Secretary of State Colin Powell charging that the Bush administration wasn't sharing enough intelligence to support the work of U.N. weapons inspectors.

"If we are truly serious about supporting the U.N. inspections, we should increase our intelligence support to the inspectors," said the letter.


:what: :what:

[Greg L]

Her handlers probably told her that she was getting to shrill for even her usual supporters. I doubt if she supports Bush now any more than she ever did.

Greg

[OF]

Her 'position' is and will be whatever her pollsters and political advisors tell her it should be.

- Gabe

[jmbg29]

Okay, whats the angle?No angle. ******* knows that she can say anything she wants, and the idiots in Noo Yawk will vote for her anyway.

She has come out before and said she was Jewish (lie). The idiots in N.Y.C. lapped it up anyway.

She had cheroot :cuss: release Puerto Rican terrorists. And N.Y.C. lapped it up.

She came out and told the cops and firemen how much she loved them. At least they had the good sense to boo her. Although 90% of them will vote for her again because their mob bosses...oops, I mean "Union Reps" tell them to.

It doesn't matter. There are less than a couple thousand Americans left in that godforsaken place. She could say that the grandparent that was married to her imaginary Jewish grandparent was the founder of Al-Qaeda, and they WOULD STILL VOTE FOR HER!!!!!!!:cuss: :cuss: :fire: :banghead: :barf:

[one-shot-one]

:p we have a saying;
even a blind pig finds an accorn once in a while!;)

[Tamara]

on the eve of her visit today to an upstate arsenal that makes military hardware like mortars and howitzers for U.S. troops.

Quelle coincidence... :rolleyes:

[Mike Irwin]

If she supports it, then we KNOW the administration's policy is wrong...

[Chris Rhines]

Most politicians are generally pro-war. It increases their personal power.

- Chris

[Ebbtide]

If she supports it, then we KNOW the administration's policy is wrong...

Would G.W.B. call "reverse psychologery"?

This woman is whack (off her rocker). What's next, pro-life?

I think she will be followed by most Dems (except Dennis Kucinich D-Ohio) when the time for war comes. We all know that Saddam will be delt with switly and we will uncover the dreaded weapons of mass destruction.

If Dems oppose the war all the way thru, this will be their last elected office.

Just another fine example of partisian politics.:barf: :barf: :barf:

[Blackhawk]

If Dems oppose the war all the way thru, this will be their last elected office.And that's their briefing point. :rolleyes: