Could they make...


PDA






Nightcrawler
March 13, 2003, 11:43 AM
Could Ruger make a GP100-frame revolver in .45ACP if they wanted to? A six shot one, I mean?

Currently, all six-shot .40-.45 caliber revolvers are on large frames, like Ruger's Redhawk and the N-Frame. (Is the Redhawk larger than the N-Frame or just heavier?)

I was wondering how necessary it is. I mean, cylinder wall width is important if you want a strong gun. I can use my own 25-5 as an example of that. It's a beautiful .45 Colt six gun, with a smooth action and perfect lockup. I can't, however, fire the full-house moderized .45 Colt hunting loads through it because it can't take it. For that reason I'm probably going to buy a .45 Redhawk.

Furthermore, could they make a 6-shot .41 Magnum or 10mm gun on the GP100 frame? Or would the cylinder walls be too thin?

If you enjoyed reading about "Could they make..." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Sisco
March 13, 2003, 12:06 PM
They probably could but have no plans to do so.
I wrote them a letter asking that question and that was the answer I got back.
Wouldn't mind seeing a GP in 40 or 10mm either.

Old Fuff
March 13, 2003, 12:11 PM
Nope, Ruger wouldn't even think about doing it. The cylinder was designed for six .357 Magnum rounds. In theory one might be made as a five-shot .41 Magnum or a possibly a six-shot .10mm with full-moon clips. The "big-ten" would work because you don't have to worry about rim clearance between the chambers.

Ruger revolvers are over-engineered to be on the strong side. You won't find them making anything that goes in the other direction.

If you enjoyed reading about "Could they make..." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!