Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?
JoeSF
March 16, 2003, 01:24 PM
full story at http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/134653784_guns15m.html
Legislature 2003
Terror bill stirs debate over status of firearms
By David Postman and Sarah Lorenzini
Seattle Times Olympia bureau
OLYMPIA — An anti-terrorism bill has spurred debate among lawmakers: Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?
The fight could jeopardize the sweeping bill proposed by Gov. Gary Locke and Attorney General Christine Gregoire to create six new terror-related crimes with harsher penalties than allowed under current state law.
A group of House Democrats wants House Bill 1210 to specifically include firearms as weapons of mass destruction, to make it clear that a terror-related gun crime would be punishable by the stiffer penalties.
from...
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/134653784_guns15m.html
If you enjoyed reading about "Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Gnull
March 16, 2003, 02:35 PM
Wait.. When did they start making Nuclear bullets... Talk about "stopping power" :D
TallPine
March 16, 2003, 02:48 PM
Only if someone shoots up a Catholic church service ....
gun-fucious
March 16, 2003, 03:56 PM
The Brady Org called "Assault Weapons" WoMDs in September at thier press conference on the Sunset of the 94 ban
MitchSchaft
March 16, 2003, 04:07 PM
The Nuke is the only WoMD.
Waitone
March 16, 2003, 04:08 PM
Everyone knows a 12 ga shotgun is a WoMD.
Those who control the language control the culture.
--Identify a target to be marginalized
--Create a term not yet in popular usage.
--Begin using that term with respect to your specific agenda
--Introduce your definitions to the selected term
--Plant news coverage featuring your term using your definition.
--Sponsor legislation to restrict activities based on your new definitions.
--Congratulations! You just marginalized another advocacy group.
Presto chango. You now own the term, its definition, and it usage.
Hkmp5sd
March 16, 2003, 04:21 PM
Ok, let the democrats designate firearms as WMD. You cannot differentiate between firearms used by terrorists and any other firearm. The UN/World Court can then charge every person in the US military that uses a firearm as a war criminal for using WMD in violation of international law and treaties.
Jason Demond
March 16, 2003, 04:36 PM
It's fer the childrens!!:uhoh:
JoeSF
March 16, 2003, 04:37 PM
Tallpine, I thought the same thing!
KY Moose
March 16, 2003, 05:59 PM
Wait.. When did they start making Nuclear bullets... Talk about "stopping power"
Hey Gnull, check this out.
http://www.birdman.org/images/nukead2big.jpg
p35
March 16, 2003, 06:08 PM
The liberals are trying to drag us gunowners into an unrelated debate to make it harder to pass the bill- cute tactic but I don't see it working and we need to save our capital for things that matter, or in other words set our own agenda.
Ironbarr
March 16, 2003, 08:01 PM
Gee, trying to larn these here things, I find they are machines of massed construction. :evil:
Jim March
March 16, 2003, 09:52 PM
Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?
Only if you shoot up a Catholic service in progress.
:rolleyes:
Standing Wolf
March 16, 2003, 10:05 PM
A gun is a weapon of mass destruction only if it's equipped with a sniper scope, bayonet lug, and the hand grip extends below the whatever. </sarcasm>
voilsb
March 16, 2003, 10:14 PM
KY moose: you beat me to it. I love whipping out the Nuke50 pictures :)
Ironbarr
March 16, 2003, 11:32 PM
Birdman rocks.
If you enjoyed reading about "Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.