Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?


PDA






JoeSF
March 16, 2003, 01:24 PM
full story at http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/134653784_guns15m.html


Legislature 2003
Terror bill stirs debate over status of firearms

By David Postman and Sarah Lorenzini
Seattle Times Olympia bureau


OLYMPIA — An anti-terrorism bill has spurred debate among lawmakers: Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?
The fight could jeopardize the sweeping bill proposed by Gov. Gary Locke and Attorney General Christine Gregoire to create six new terror-related crimes with harsher penalties than allowed under current state law.

A group of House Democrats wants House Bill 1210 to specifically include firearms as weapons of mass destruction, to make it clear that a terror-related gun crime would be punishable by the stiffer penalties.
from...

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/134653784_guns15m.html

If you enjoyed reading about "Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Gnull
March 16, 2003, 02:35 PM
Wait.. When did they start making Nuclear bullets... Talk about "stopping power" :D

TallPine
March 16, 2003, 02:48 PM
Only if someone shoots up a Catholic church service ....

gun-fucious
March 16, 2003, 03:56 PM
The Brady Org called "Assault Weapons" WoMDs in September at thier press conference on the Sunset of the 94 ban

MitchSchaft
March 16, 2003, 04:07 PM
The Nuke is the only WoMD.

Waitone
March 16, 2003, 04:08 PM
Everyone knows a 12 ga shotgun is a WoMD.

Those who control the language control the culture.
--Identify a target to be marginalized
--Create a term not yet in popular usage.
--Begin using that term with respect to your specific agenda
--Introduce your definitions to the selected term
--Plant news coverage featuring your term using your definition.
--Sponsor legislation to restrict activities based on your new definitions.
--Congratulations! You just marginalized another advocacy group.

Presto chango. You now own the term, its definition, and it usage.

Hkmp5sd
March 16, 2003, 04:21 PM
Ok, let the democrats designate firearms as WMD. You cannot differentiate between firearms used by terrorists and any other firearm. The UN/World Court can then charge every person in the US military that uses a firearm as a war criminal for using WMD in violation of international law and treaties.

Jason Demond
March 16, 2003, 04:36 PM
It's fer the childrens!!:uhoh:

JoeSF
March 16, 2003, 04:37 PM
Tallpine, I thought the same thing!

KY Moose
March 16, 2003, 05:59 PM
Wait.. When did they start making Nuclear bullets... Talk about "stopping power"

Hey Gnull, check this out.

http://www.birdman.org/images/nukead2big.jpg

p35
March 16, 2003, 06:08 PM
The liberals are trying to drag us gunowners into an unrelated debate to make it harder to pass the bill- cute tactic but I don't see it working and we need to save our capital for things that matter, or in other words set our own agenda.

Ironbarr
March 16, 2003, 08:01 PM
Gee, trying to larn these here things, I find they are machines of massed construction. :evil:

Jim March
March 16, 2003, 09:52 PM
Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?

Only if you shoot up a Catholic service in progress.

:rolleyes:

Standing Wolf
March 16, 2003, 10:05 PM
A gun is a weapon of mass destruction only if it's equipped with a sniper scope, bayonet lug, and the hand grip extends below the whatever. </sarcasm>

voilsb
March 16, 2003, 10:14 PM
KY moose: you beat me to it. I love whipping out the Nuke50 pictures :)

Ironbarr
March 16, 2003, 11:32 PM
Birdman rocks.

If you enjoyed reading about "Is a gun a weapon of mass destruction?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!