Okay, which of three choices for a home defense rifle?
tex_n_cal
March 19, 2003, 03:15 AM
I think my choices are:
1. Mini-14 stainless ranch rifle in .223
2. Mini-Thirty in the same config. (7.62 x 39 cal)
3. Get some more magazines, brass and dies for my 1907 Winchester in .351 Self loading:evil:
What would you choose? :)
If you enjoyed reading about "Okay, which of three choices for a home defense rifle?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
cratz2
March 19, 2003, 03:25 AM
If it's to be used extensively indoors then overpenetration should be a concern unless you live alone and in the middle of nowhere. I'd go with the Mini 14 and some 55 Gr Nosler Ballistic Tips. Should be one of the least penetrating rounds on hard stuff like drywall and wood but should prove very nasty on bad guys.
Kahr carrier
March 19, 2003, 05:54 AM
Ditto Mini 14 ranch rifle 223.:)
9mmepiphany
March 19, 2003, 02:23 PM
if you don't mind being limited to 5 rounds in the factory, but at least reliable, mag...i'd vote for a mini-14 ranch rifle too.
personal choice, in CA, is the SKS with it's fixed 10 rounder and a load of stripper clips. of course then you'd have to go to the more affordable 7.62x39mm round
Onslaught
March 19, 2003, 04:54 PM
I personally believe that the Mini-30 is the reason the Mini-14 got a bad rap for accuracy problems :uhoh: I could barely keep 'em all on a paper plate at 100 yards!!! (Shut up... it was NOT the shooter :D )
Also, the 30 has NO reliable aftermarket 10+ capacity mags. The 14 has PMI and Thermold.
No question... I'd go Mini-14.
Ian
March 19, 2003, 04:56 PM
I'd have to go with the 1907 Winchester (assuming its reliable). More potent, and probably more accurate too (especially given that all its ammo would be handloaded). I do have a thing for old guns, though...
Redlg155
March 19, 2003, 05:37 PM
I'd go with the Mini 14. Specialized ammunition is available for those with overpenetration concerns.
As for the Winchester, I'd vote against it because no factory ammunition is available for defense. I know there is a lot of debate on the factory ammunition versus reloads, but I personally use only factory for defense. I don't want some lawyer using it in an arguement against me.
Good Shooting
Red
Hkmp5sd
March 19, 2003, 05:39 PM
Since my home defense rifle is a stainless Mini-14 with a folding stock, think the Mini-14 is the one I'd recommend. :)
e5c03
March 19, 2003, 05:39 PM
Hey if you don't want the .351 then let me know.It was the LEO choice for some time for a reason,get the dies and keep it.I HAVE A DEFINITE ATITUDE against Ruger,as I remember the pre Kalifornia days,when the ban was going to debate Ruger kinda supported it through the Cattlemen's Assoc.
:banghead: :cuss: :cuss: :banghead: :barf:
TaurusGL
March 19, 2003, 06:11 PM
For home defense I wouldn't recomend any of those. What I would recomend is a shotgun, it fits the perfect description of what you want
1. Lethal (extemley)
2. cheap ammo
3. cheap gun(it's only going to be used for home defense right)
4. Lack of need to aim(short distances+wide pattern=DOA)
5. Most important of all you can be gaunteed that if you miss you aren't going to kill any one accidentaly
Those are my two cents. Plus if you are practicing gun saftey you will have the guns locked in a gun safe and ammo not stored with it so whatever
benEzra
March 19, 2003, 10:59 PM
My primary HD weapon at the moment is a stainless .223 mini-14 with a Choate pistol-grip stock; ammo is Federal 40-gr JHP in a 30-rd magazine (downloaded to about 24 rounds), so you know which one I'll recommend!
The 40-grainers are extremely unlikely to penetrate an exterior wall, the pistol grip stock aids in retention and maneuvering in close quarters, and at home-defense ranges I keep the rear sight folded down and aim with the front sight only, if needed.
I'd recommend the -14 over the -30 for reasons of capacity, wider availability of full-capacity magazines, and much lower likelihood of overpenetration with the right ammunition.
TaurusGL is right, a short-barreled shotgun is also a good choice, but I prefer the rifle for its ability to make a precision shot if needed, greater magazine capacity, and ergonomic reasons. I will say, though, that across-the-room distances, a shotgun pattern will only be a couple inches wide, so you will still need to aim (just a little less precisely than with a rifle or handgun).
Duke of Lawnchair
March 19, 2003, 11:09 PM
I'll toss in another vote for the Mini14.
makarov
March 20, 2003, 12:03 AM
What about a SAIGA in either 7.62x39 or in .223? Same basic size as a Ruger at half the price. 10 round factory mags are cheap and reliable. I know it wasn't one of the choices, but as much as I like the Mini, I think it is a little overpriced.
9mmepiphany
March 20, 2003, 12:12 PM
ah if we could only get the saiga in CA...
my primary long gun for home is the sar-2 in 5.45x39mm
Quartus
March 20, 2003, 01:52 PM
Mini (14 and 30s) are okay as a ranch rifle, but have a lousy track record under sustained fire. They weren't built for it.
Talk to someone who instructs a combat carbine course on a regular basis. Here's what they'll tell you: People who bring minis usually find themselves borrowing something else to complete the course. THey just don't hold up.
Mike Irwin
March 20, 2003, 02:09 PM
"I personally believe that the Mini-30 is the reason the Mini-14 got a bad rap for accuracy problems..."
Uh, that would be a great big No, Onslaught.
The Mini 30 came out what, about 15 years ago?
The Mini 14 was having accuracy reputation problems LONG before that.
MY rifle of choice for such a situation?
I've got two first picks...
My SKS.
My Marlin Camp Carbine in 9mm.
Watch-Six
March 20, 2003, 04:06 PM
I can't believe that I am about to recommend a Mini14 for anything, but with your set of lousey choices in Kali you may have to settle for a mediocre solution (Mini14). Watch-Six
s&w 24
March 20, 2003, 04:22 PM
I have a very strong opinion of the winchester 1907. It is a flat out wonderful little carbine ! The balistics are better than 357 mag carbine loads, it's a self loader, and they handle great. If you work up some hand loads with a fully jacketed hollow point bullet ( hornady XTP as apposed to rem 125 hollow point) it would be far better than most new guns in stores today.
Mike Irwin
March 20, 2003, 04:40 PM
"If you work up some hand loads with a
fully jacketed hollow point bullet ( hornady XTP as apposed to rem 125 hollow point) it would be far better than
most new guns in stores today."
How do you get around the problem that the .351 uses .351-cal. bullets?
Onslaught
March 20, 2003, 04:41 PM
4. Lack of need to aim(short distances+wide pattern=DOA)
Though true that a shotgun is great for home defense, this statement is a widely used fairytale...
Short distances + shotgun = one single clump-o lead... You don't aim with shotgun at short distance, you miss with shotgun just like rifle!!!
At 10 - 15 feet, there is NO "pattern". It's just one big hole.
Shotgun is a good thing, not aiming and expecting to magically hit your target anyway is just plain irresponsible.
Uh, that would be a great big No, Onslaught.
The Mini 30 came out what, about 15 years ago?
The Mini 14 was having accuracy reputation problems LONG before that.
Awe gee, did I forget the "sarcasm" smilie again! http://images.bravenet.com/brpics/smilie/cartman.gif
Besides, I got my Mini-30 when I was 15, and I had just learned of both rifles... I also didn't know my 14 was "inaccurate" until I joined TFL :D
Dr.Rob
March 20, 2003, 07:21 PM
None of the above. Recent events in FLA not withstanding, a rifle for HD is a no-no unless your nieghbors and housemates (dogs, kids, wives, etc) are out of the field of fire.
The 351 did a heck of a job on Bonnie and Clyde though.
Now, if thats ALL you have to choose from I'd opt for the mini 30 or mini 14. Either one can hold point of aim for 20 shots at hallway distance (not that you should need 20 shots to get a bad guy moving in the opposite direction). The 1907 is cool, but its old.. what if it breaks when you need it? Use a soft pointed bullet, rather than a frangible and practice shooting in low light conditions. (After all, who deer hunts with a frangible?)
A shotgun is better, a pistol is handier, either one coupled with a big dog is formidable.
Sven
March 20, 2003, 07:38 PM
I'm throwing in a vote for an M1 Carbine.
aerod1
March 20, 2003, 08:15 PM
Another vote for the Mini-14.
Jim Hall
Soap
March 20, 2003, 09:30 PM
None. Unless you live far out in the country, I wouldn't even consider a rifle for HD.
atek3
March 21, 2003, 05:48 AM
Browning M2HB on a pintel mount, loaded w/ a 3 to 3 to 1 mixture of ball, raufoss, and tracer. Wait, by home defense, you meant 'compound defense' right?
Just kidding people :)
atek3
Quartus
March 21, 2003, 09:29 AM
Browning M2HB on a pintel mount, loaded w/ a 3 to 3 to 1 mixture of ball, raufoss, and tracer.
Ah! At LAST a sensible answer! :D
Welcome aboard, atek!
M-1 carbine ain't a bad choice.
dev_null
March 21, 2003, 09:46 AM
Depends where you live, doesn't it? Urban, suburban, country... Out of your choices, I'd take the Mini-14, but my own (suburban townhouse) is a Remington 870 in 12-ga. with #6 shot. My SHTF rifle would be the FAL.
-0-
stevelyn
March 21, 2003, 10:29 AM
If you have to use a rifle for HD go with the Mini-14. Then invest in a supply of frangible ammo like Hornady TAP, Glaser, MagSafe, or Extreme Shock.
Otherwise, to coin a Clint Smithism, I recommend a reliable handgun to fight your way over to the HD shotgun you should not have let get out of arms reach.
If you enjoyed reading about "Okay, which of three choices for a home defense rifle?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.