Dixie Chicks: anti-GWB, anti-fur... what next???
Preacherman
March 20, 2003, 08:39 PM
Not only are the Dixie Chicks anti-GWB, they seem to be anti-fur and anti-hunting as well. They posed for this picture for PETA:
http://www.sebreephoto.com/pix/images/PETA%20ANTI-FUR%20.jpg
Are we really sure these gals are from Texas?
If you enjoyed reading about "Dixie Chicks: anti-GWB, anti-fur... what next???" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
DeltaElite
March 20, 2003, 08:42 PM
Let's hope they are anti-reproduction and their faulty genes stop with them. :D
El Tejon
March 20, 2003, 09:09 PM
Isn't there so wacko movement in Kalifornia in which people pledge not to reproduce? I was watching "Jeopardy" while on the treadmill a couple of weeks ago and one of the idiot actors from "3d Planet from the Sun" (the long-haired kid) was decrying that the earf contained too many people. What, no tall buildings in L.A. for you, gutless?
Tommy Gunn
March 20, 2003, 09:25 PM
These women are hard Left liberals. Might as well come from California.
hksw
March 20, 2003, 09:47 PM
Well, there's always anti-gun.
CZ-75
March 20, 2003, 09:56 PM
Well, there's always anti-gun.
Anyone doubt it?
I mean they support PETA, so they are obviously pro-bambi. And the 2nd is really about hunting.
TallPine
March 20, 2003, 09:57 PM
You have to admit, they're not wearing any fur in that picture.
:D
DeltaElite
March 20, 2003, 10:01 PM
Well Tallpine, apparently you have x-ray vision. :p
All I can see are musical instruments. :what:
Lone_Gunman
March 20, 2003, 10:09 PM
I dont know if they are wearing any fur or not...
dang banjo...
Blackhawk
March 20, 2003, 10:18 PM
Look like Ditzy Tricks to me.
Navy joe
March 20, 2003, 10:19 PM
Probably from Austin, a little strange city-state unto its own lost in Texas. I'd rather listen to Charlie Daniels any day.
edit. Ya know, these gals are starting to make Steve Earle seem normal.
Obvious hypocrites, no way the short, fat, loud one got that way on a vegan diet.
AR-10
March 20, 2003, 10:19 PM
What's next?
Obscurity.
Blackhawk
March 20, 2003, 10:22 PM
From an email today:Information on three more rocket scientists who disagree with the foreign policy of this country and our leadership.
The Dixie Chicks
Natalie Louise Maines
Experience:Waitress @ Orlandos Italian Restaurants , singer
Education: dropped out of Berkelee College of Music and Texas Tech University
Martha Elenor Maguire
Experience: Scooped Ice Cream @ the Braums Ice Cream Store, singer
Education: High School
Emily Burns Erwin Robison
Experience: Hostess @ Cajun Restaurant, singer
Education: High School
CZ 75 BD
March 20, 2003, 10:45 PM
Here they are.
cool45auto
March 20, 2003, 11:24 PM
Good one!:D
Flatfender
March 20, 2003, 11:28 PM
Maybe they'll claim to be more popular* than Jesus.:scrutiny:
*Obscure Beatles reference for those that don't know.
Flatfender
March 20, 2003, 11:32 PM
Lone_Gunman wrote:
I dont know if they are wearing any fur or not...
dang banjo...
Can't see their armpits either. :what:
Study Butte
March 21, 2003, 01:01 AM
I believe Natalie is from Lubbock, so she's a "sand aggie".
jmbg29
March 21, 2003, 01:09 AM
Where they are from is an accident of birth.
The oblivion they are headed to is of their own design.
:cuss: the Ditzy Twits!:fire: :fire: :fire:
Pendragon
March 21, 2003, 01:11 AM
Uh, let me get this strait.
You guys are slamming the act that had the #1 album for several weeks - because they used to have real jobs at restaurants?
Please.:rolleyes:
They are freaking MUSICIANS!
The sisters have been playing bluegrass all their lives and Natalie dropped out of college to join the group because they were about to get a contract.
Tell me you would not do the same.
They are musicians, they make pretty music, they put it on CDs and we buy the CD and listen to them.
I like them a lot better when they kept their mouths shut, but if I only listened to music made by people I agreed with on politics, war, religion and child rearin, I would be listening to CRAP!.
Most musicians are nutty - they say nutty things and when they do, everyone should look at them, raise their eyebrows, roll their eyes and wait for them to go back to makin pretty music.
Up until all this, I would have gone to their concert if I could swing it - now I would not cause I dont want to hear them talk - but I will buy more of their CDs - mostly because a corporation makes most of the money and artists make money by touring.
Jeeze people - lighten up. :neener:
Hot brass
March 21, 2003, 01:12 AM
You have my permission to rage on California.
Just remember,not everyone from Cali,is a lib.:scrutiny:
faustulus
March 21, 2003, 01:17 AM
I don't like what they say but I will defend their right to say it -- espeically when they say it like that. grrrwwlll;)
Blackhawk
March 21, 2003, 01:51 AM
You guys are slamming the act that had the #1 album for several weeks - because they used to have real jobs at restaurants?
Seems like you suggested that first, Pendragon. :neener:
triggertime
March 21, 2003, 01:57 AM
Hopefully the Vichy Chicks will go the way of Sinead O'Connor and fade into deep obscurity.
Waitone
March 21, 2003, 08:29 AM
Most musicians are nutty - they say nutty things and when they do, everyone should look at them, raise their eyebrows, roll their eyes and wait for them to go back to makin pretty music. There is just too many microphones out there. Its the availability of microphones that turns "intelligent" people into blithering idiots. We need common sense microphone control. These people can't be trusted with such a potent weapon of sefl-destruction. Microphones have got to be registered. I thought international transportation of microphones was highly regulated. Are the Ditzy Chumps microphone runners?
"Don't try to teach a pig to sing. You're wasting your time and you irritate the pig."
Don Gwinn
March 21, 2003, 08:35 AM
I'm sorry, folks, I stopped paying attention after the picture. Could you repeat all that?
:evil:
TallPine
March 21, 2003, 10:33 AM
Banjo ....? What banjo? I didn't see a banjo .... :confused:
:D
CatsDieNow
March 21, 2003, 10:45 AM
Can I make a request?
If you must post pictures of things such as women who are strategically covering parts of their body with various items, please do it as a link and give some warning. I really don't care to have to explain to my male co-workers why I am looking the Naked Dixie Chicks.
marley
March 21, 2003, 10:52 AM
If you belive just half of the stuff about the catholic church sex abuse case. Then Sinead O' Connor just might have been right when she said fight the real enemy. Patrick:(
DRC
March 21, 2003, 10:57 AM
I just want to see them in Playboy NEKKID! :)
I've listened to their music and still do (my daughter likes to sing to their songs) When I see them on TV I'm rarely listening to anything they have to say and pay more attention to what they're wearing than what they're singing simply because they're not hard to look at.
They can be liberals if they want just as long as they realize that they are being gocked at chauvanistically :) There are some entertainers that I just enjoy staring at. Sorry, I'm human. :)
Take care,
DRC
Mike Irwin
March 21, 2003, 10:59 AM
Bless you for finding this photo, Preacherman.
I just used it to hammer the living hell out of some people on the messageboards run by my local country music radio station...
Preacherman
March 21, 2003, 11:44 AM
If you belive just half of the stuff about the catholic church sex abuse case. Then Sinead O' Connor just might have been right when she said fight the real enemy. PatrickPatrick, I'm trying to find the connection between the "catholic church sex abuse case" and the Dixie Chicks... can you help??? Unless the DC's were among the abused? Or did they do the abusing? :confused: :confused: :confused:
Anyway, don't believe most of what the media had to say about the Catholic sex abuse scandal. The total number of priests accused (not tried, not convicted, just accused) is less than half of one percent of all priests active in the USA today. Of those accused, a fairly large number have been exonerated - many allegations have been made by money-grubbing shyster lawyers with highly suspect clients. In the population as a whole, according to the psychologists I work with every day, the child-abuse factor is around 3%, with the same percentage reported in married clergy: so it looks as if Catholic clergy are doing considerably better in this area than the general population. Unfortunately, because they're priests, their cases are publicized far more widely than those of "normal" folks. I agree that even one case is too much, and I concur that we should throw the book at those who are guilty: but let's maintain a sense of proportion while doing so.
That said, back to the topic! :D
TallPine
March 21, 2003, 11:53 AM
I say so what if they want to show off their .... er, ignorance.
:D
Oleg Volk
March 21, 2003, 12:08 PM
you, too, padre? this is sooooo OT...
If you enjoyed reading about "Dixie Chicks: anti-GWB, anti-fur... what next???" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.