Frandy
July 13, 2005, 10:50 AM
Just curious if the "matte bead blast" finish on the JM version is more prone to scratch or wear in any way that makes the 625 stainless finish more durable by comparison. Anyone? Thanks!
|
Frandy July 13, 2005, 10:50 AM Just curious if the "matte bead blast" finish on the JM version is more prone to scratch or wear in any way that makes the 625 stainless finish more durable by comparison. Anyone? Thanks!
If you enjoyed reading about "Is there a difference in durability of the finish between S&W 625 and S&W 625JM?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
JoeHatley July 13, 2005, 10:54 AM No, but the minor dings show up more on the bead blasted finish. Bead blasted 625 http://www.iowatelecom.net/~hatley/625_Vcomp_r.jpg Regular brushed stainless (Flitzed) http://www.iowatelecom.net/~hatley/625pc_r.jpg Joe
If you enjoyed reading about "Is there a difference in durability of the finish between S&W 625 and S&W 625JM?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
|