7.62 X 39 Revolver?


PDA






hondo68
April 2, 2003, 03:45 AM
Is there any such thing? Just a wild notion I had.
:scrutiny:

If you enjoyed reading about "7.62 X 39 Revolver?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Nightcrawler
April 2, 2003, 04:05 AM
I seriously doubt it. Might be kind of difficult, with 7.62x39 being a rimless, bottleneck cartridge. Be fun to shoot, though!

Robert inOregon
April 2, 2003, 04:33 AM
Rumor is that 7.62x39 is one of the many cartridges being tossed around for a future X frame production. Two-two-three is another.

WhoKnowsWho
April 2, 2003, 08:36 AM
A 7.62x39 revolver? Only if the X-Frame is less than $700 and it works fine with all of my Wolf ammo!

But it would be kind of cool!

caz223
April 2, 2003, 02:11 PM
Why not, FA has a .45-70 revolver.

Pendragon
April 2, 2003, 04:19 PM
I would be concerned that a tapered cartridge would expand and push out of the cylinder - possibly making a jam much more likely.

QuarterBoreGunner
April 2, 2003, 06:47 PM
I would be concerned that a tapered cartridge would expand and push out of the cylinder - possibly making a jam much more likely


This is exactly the problem Smith & Wesson had with their Model 53 revolver that was chambered in .22 Rem Jet; case set back and cylinder binding.

I'm curious how Taurus is getting away with it in their .22 Hornet and .218 Bee revolvers.

Any one have a clue?

charleym3
April 2, 2003, 06:50 PM
What's an X frame?

I had the "unique" experience of shooting a .22 Jet once. A bottle of acetone was pretty much a requirement. Swabbing out the cylinder after about 30 rounds kept things running fairly smoothly.

Okiecruffler
April 2, 2003, 08:21 PM
Sounds like a definate bind-up problem to me, but why couldn't they use some kind of moonclip?

I was told that the .22 Hornet works because of the taper of the case. Not sure if that's true or if it works with the .218 Bee.

max popenker
April 3, 2003, 02:02 AM
threre was a revolver in 5.45x39.

developed in Ukraine (ex-USSR, if you don't know) this double-action device was intended as a a poor mans' Five-seveN. Developed in the mid or late 1990s, anc called 'Yesaul", this was the ugliest gun i've ever seen :barf: (sorry, but looks like i've lost the only pic of this rarity :( )

Most probably never produced in any quantity.

WonderNine
April 3, 2003, 05:04 AM
A bottlenecked rimless cartridge in a revolver is completely ridiculous!

Believe me I'm the first in line with money in hand for a quality new production 5 or 6 shot snubnosed or 4" moonclip using lightweight revolver because they make a great backup gun to your 9mm auto and a cheap shooter, but bottlenecked cartridges on top of it? No way man! NEVER HAPPEN

Feanaro
April 3, 2003, 05:12 AM
I wouldn't want one. 7.62 Russian kicks enough in a rifle. :what:

If you enjoyed reading about "7.62 X 39 Revolver?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!