9 X 23 Question?


PDA






Marshall
January 2, 2003, 06:02 AM
What is the deal with this cartridge? Why are so few pistols made to shoot this round, it's ballistics are teriffic from what I can see?

Is there no market for it? Is the cartridge too powerful for the pistols making the pistol too expensive to manufacture? Is it no fun to shoot?

Can you taylor pistols made in 9X19 to accept the 9X23?

What be the deal?


Thanks
Marshall :)

If you enjoyed reading about "9 X 23 Question?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
ThePerfectOne
January 2, 2003, 06:14 AM
in the us, there is no need for the 9x23. it was only designed for countries where the 9x19 is banned because military rounds are prohibited for civilians over there. but maybe I'm confusing with the 9x21 :confused:

Marshall
January 2, 2003, 06:34 AM
Thanks Perfect,

No, I am speaking of the 9X23 that Winchester introduced primarly for IPSC competition (I believe). I think it is mainly being used in custom pistols.

Robert inOregon
January 2, 2003, 06:53 AM
The 9x23 cartridge was actually developed by John Ricco and then stolen by Winchester.

Dane Burns seems to be the internet expert on the subject. Here's the link to his web site and his forum.

http://www.burnscustom.com/

http://www.pistolsmith.com/

Marshall
January 2, 2003, 07:06 AM
Thank's for the link Robert.

Shmackey
January 2, 2003, 10:40 AM
but maybe I'm confusing with the 9x21

Yep. 9x23 is a whole different animal.

Sean Smith
January 2, 2003, 10:57 AM
9x23 is arguably the "better mousetrap" self-defense cartridge, assuming you like the 1911 platform that is. It has actually been around for quite a while.

You get 10+1 rounds of true .357 Magnum ballistics (and unlike .357 Sig, that includes with heavier bullet weights), light recoil, nearly indestructible brass and a cartridge shape perfect for super-smooth feeding in a 1911.

How does 125gr @ 1,500+ ft/sec or a safe 147gr handload at 1,400 ft/sec sound?

Unfortunately it is sort of a niche cartridge, you can get good factory Winchester ammo for it but that's it.

Wakal
January 2, 2003, 02:00 PM
What he said...a great and underappreciated cartridge. The local freak and geek group (including my wife and I) all shoot STI's in 9 by 23.

Had one of those "D'oh" moments and realized that it would make a great carry load...so I'm working up a new STI with a Commander-length slide in 9 by 23. Another neat feature...since 9 by 23 is basically a stretched chamber 9 by 19...is that a properly set up 9 by 23 can also shoot 9 by 19 (great for Steel matches in a IPSC Open gun), 9 by 21, .38 Supercomp...haven't tried 9 by 18 in it yet, but not for lack of curiousity.



Alex

BigG
January 2, 2003, 02:48 PM
I've seen a few factory Colts chambered in 9X23.

okeydoke
January 4, 2003, 12:22 AM
manyfold. The main reason is the cost of 9x19 ammo being about 1/3rd of the cost of 9x23 ammo. Another is the lack of DA or Glocks in this caliber. The 9x23 is too long to fit in the mags of the many guns that are built around the 9x19 cartridge. The 357 sig will fit in those guns, you see. So will the .40 short and weak.

Jspy
January 4, 2003, 04:51 AM
Wakal What do you mean by "properly set up" ? Since you are a 9x23 shooter I would assume you may have done some shooting with the 9x19, etc. I've heard of using the 38 Super in the 9x23 but have also heard that its not even recommended. My memory is a little fuzzy, but it seems like even Dane Burns doesn't advocate mixing em up. The 9mm Largo included. BTW, I have one of the factory Colt Govts. in 9x23 AND a 38 Super.

Patman
August 2, 2006, 12:08 AM
I found this old thread and thought I might bring it back to life !

I realize that Dane Burns discourages firing of the 9X23 Winchester in a .38 Super, but there are those who have discovered that the Witness .38 Supers fire the ammo actually quite well. 18+1 rds. of this cartridge, which can be loaded to very powerful levels, is one of my favorite guns to fire. I don't actually load my 147 gr. XTPs to the velocity listed above, but I just happen to have loaded 30 rds for a test run last nite. It is such a robust case that if you use small rifle primers you can achieve great ballistics safely. I have flattened some small pistol primers but have never seen a sign of a case bulge. (I'm not going to ever push it that far). With the rifle primers, I'm sure I can get the performance I always strived for with .38 super.

The design of the extractor is the main concern (for me) since the extractor is designed for the semi-rimmed 38 Super case. I have experienced a few FTEs, but not often. Although the taper of the case is a little different than 38 super, it doesn't seem to be a problem with any other function of the gun. The large frame Witness can handle the abuse of the hot 10mm loads I fire so I know it can handle this cartridge very well. I doesn't hurt the that Witnesses are very affordable. This line of CZ clones has developed quite a following. They are available in more calibers than any pistol I know of. I have five. I'd like to have a 1911 that would fire this great caliber in my collection also. I'm sure it would be a pleasure to fire.

Link: http://p201.ezboard.com/fczechpistols82792frm35

Good Shootin'
-patman

TSH77769
August 2, 2006, 06:47 AM
9x23mm brings the full spectrum of .357 magnum capability to the auto pistol, unlike .357 SIG, which relpicates only a few low end loadings and has difficulty with heaveri/longer projectiles due to a short necked bottle necked design. You also get a higher capacity, at the expense of grip size.

The design is also ver freindly to relaoaders, both in the ease of doing so and the life of the brass. Furthermore, you can swage down .357 projectiles and make laods using them, something taht you really can't/shouldn't do with the .357 SIG.

It is inevitable that the 9x23mm get compared to the .357 SIG, but this does not really tell the whole thing, on its surface.

BTW, the 1911 (single stack or wide body), the EAA Witness, and the Glock 20 all make excellent platforms for the 9x23. Others are also good canidates, but the above are particualrly suited due to the ability to get replacement barrells, springs, and buffers.

The EAA Witness, in particualr, freaking rocks in that caliber. Also, there is enough meat/metal in the grip on one that it can be shaved down a bit for a smaller grip. Be careful here though, go slow.

Tsh77769

EddieCoyle
August 2, 2006, 06:58 AM
Does the 9x23 offer significant ballistic advantages over the 10mm?

Patman
August 2, 2006, 11:51 AM
The 9X23 doesn't have any advantages over 10mm that I can think of except that it has less recoil even in my hotter loads. It also allows me to successfully fire the loads in a pistol which is rally designed for a 38 super. (Altho I won't encourage it for anyone else but me) I don't want to cause anyone else to have any problems altho I (and many others) do this on a regular basis cith our EAA large frame 38 Supers.

The 10mm is hard to beat for performance in a semi auto pistol. I don't think the 9X23 can touch it in powerful reloads altho off the shelf ammo in 10mm is usually wimpy. Double Tap ammo offers some "full house" loads in 10mm I am told. The only 9X23 loads available as far as I know are from Winchester, but I bet they are wimpy too. You just have to load your own in either of these fine calibers.

I hope it never happens, but if I ever need in a weapon in some sort of situation, I would sure like to have my EAA Witness 10mm loaded with my reloads and several loaded 18 round mags.

My next choice might very well be my Witness 38 super loaded with 9X23 hot loads.

Good shootin, guys !

-Pat

1911Tuner
August 2, 2006, 12:39 PM
The man to ask for answers concerning the 9X23 is Dane Burns. he knows the ropes.

Otherguy Overby
August 2, 2006, 01:11 PM
9x23 runs at higher pressure than other pistol rounds. Maybe 50% higher pressure than hot 38Super.

Way back in the last century development was done by using .223 brass shortened to 23mm. If you reload, you are more likely to lose 9X23 brass before it becomes unusable... :)

See:

http://www.burnscustom.com/showarticle.php3?article=9x23/9x23WhereAreWe.php3
http://www.burnscustom.com/9x23/generalcomments.html


I've a 9X23 1911. No one wants to let go of it once they've shot it.

BullfrogKen
August 2, 2006, 07:45 PM
My carry gun is a 9x23 LW Colt Commander. Its a great cartridge in a great platform. Cor-Bon and Winchester offer loads for it, though the White Box doesn't use stout primers, so they flake off and can clog the firing pin hole.

I shoot 38 Super in it all the time, no problem. And I had a 9mm barrel fitted to it so I can practice with WWB on the cheap.

Colt and Springfield built them for a short time. Jim Garthwaite built mine. Most any 9mm or 38 Super 1911 can convert to it. You need something that has a deep mag well to accept the long magazines the cartridge needs.


I've seen maybe 10 that Jim has built, ranging from steel 5" 1911s, down to LW Officer frames with Commander slides - which is an AWESOME size by the way. They are simply great, very versatile, quick shooting guns in that cartridge. And paired with a 9mm barrel, you have a package you can afford to practice with, carrying the same gun you just practiced cheaply with, and don't get beat to hell with in a 1000 rd weekend class.


Jim builds them like no one else. Dane has a lot of popularity, but Jim's the guy I go to for my pistolsmith needs. He's built a bunch, carries a 9x23 himself, and will do work that Dane won't - like build them on a alloy frame.

I'm extremely pleased with mine. I'd like a LW Officer/Commander, but I have no desire to for anything else. I don't think a single stack is a disadvantage at all. In fact, it carries comfortably and is so slim, I think its an advantage.

grendelbane
August 2, 2006, 09:03 PM
I have a question for all you guys who shoot 9x23 in .38 Super chambers and vice versa.

Do you reload this brass? If so, do you get good results and good life?

There is a slight difference in the dimensions of the 2 cases. This shows up big time if you run the wrong case into the wrong die. (Or perhaps I mean the right die:scrutiny: ).

I can see where the dimensions are so close that some people could get away with firing one in the other, (not that I recommend that practice), but I would think that there would be enough difference in the fired brass to cause problems reloading.

As far as comparing the 9x23mm to the 357 SIG, I have taken a third path. I load 357 SIG with 147 grain bullets seated 1.265" and use 10mm magazines in my rebarreled Delta Elite. I have duplicated the reasonable velocities people claim for the 9x23mm. I have not attained the unreasonable velocities, but then I am some what of a coward. This setup has been reliability challenged, but I think that I am finally getting it right. 9x23mm is certainly easier to work with, and offers higher magazine capacity. 357 SIG brass is strong, if not as strong as 9x23, and a lot cheaper and more readily available.

If I had it all to do over, I would just get a 9x23mm. Still, those long loaded 357 SIGs look cute.:cool:

Patman
August 2, 2006, 10:34 PM
I don't know about anyone else, and I have only been loading and shooting 9X23 for about a year, but I have had ZERO case failures of any sort. I have fired my first 100 case I started with over and over with no problems and I am shooting them in my 38 super. They've probably been reused about 10 or 12 times. I hear they may last dozens of reloads. I don't suggest anyone else do this, but I have had no problems at all in my eqpt. I understand that the restretching of the brass may cause premature failure, but I haven't seen any sign of it yet. I can see the concern and I have been very careful not to take any great chances. It's not a very great difference from 38 super dimensions and may not cause any problems at all. If I run into any problems down the road, I'll report them here.

I agree the 1911 is a great platform for this caliber. I don't have a 1911 in 38 super, but I may start looking for one and then get some work done on it so I can shoot 9X23 in it as well. (and ,as you mentioned, 9mm, so I can practice with WW box)

I love the round. I just have to stay focused on my other endeavors. I want a 1911 in 10mm too. (And a 45 super and a .............)

Anyway the 9X23 Winchester Brass is very tough and lasts quite a while. I just broke out my second 100 rds the other night with another test with 147 gr XTPs with HS6. I decided I'd work up a carry/defense load. I only had HS6 data. Anyone else tried 147gr in this?

Does anyone have any Power Pistol or Long Shot data for 9X23 ?

I usually take the time and work up carefully from 38 super data, but it takes a few trips to the range because I'm somewhat of a coward too. I blew up a .40 S&W (with a factory overcharged load) in a brand new gun a few yrs ago. I'll spare you the story , but it wasn't a pleasurable trip to the range.

good shootin'

-Pat

Clark
August 3, 2006, 11:50 AM
9 X 23 Question?
What is the deal with this cartridge? Why are so few pistols made to shoot this round, it's ballistics are teriffic from what I can see?

Is there no market for it? Is the cartridge too powerful for the pistols making the pistol too expensive to manufacture? Is it no fun to shoot?

Can you taylor pistols made in 9X19 to accept the 9X23?

What be the deal?


Thanks
Marshall

CAUTION: The following post includes loading data beyond currently published maximums for this cartridge. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Neither the writer, The High Road, nor the staff of THR assume any liability for any damage or injury resulting from use of this information.


I converted a Tokarev or two to 9x23mm by reaming out a 9x19mm barrel.
The Tokarevs are designed for the 7.62x25mm Tokarev round with an OAL of 1.35".

That is longer than the magazine design for 45acp at 1.275" or 9x19mm Luger at 1.169"

IIRC, the 9x23mm cartridge is not SAAMI registered, but most put the OAL at 1.245"

I have been shooting 9x23 in my Tokarev with:
158 gr Hornady XTP JHP and 16 gr of Power Pistol, 1.36"
In contrast, the Alliant max load for 357 magnum is:
158 gr Hornady XTP JHP and 8 gr of Power Pistol, 1.575"
http://www.alliantpowder.com/reloaders/RecipeDetail.aspx?title=Pistols%20and%20Revolvers&gtypeid=1&weight=158&shellid=1015&bulletid=29

For those who know what that means, they can see my Tokarev has gone atomic with 9x23mm


I also have converted a Star Super B.
That pistol frame with long enough magazine for 9mm Largo, but is chambered for 9x19.
I converted one for 9x23mm and have been shooting it with
158 gr LSWC, 10 gr LONGSHOT, 1.129"
In contrast, Hodgdon in 2002 showed for maximum load for 357 magnum:
158 gr HNDY XTP JHP, 8.4 gr LONGSHOT, 1.580" 1394 fps, 43,200 c.u.p.

To deal with heavy recoil, I reamed out the recoil spring coweling of the Star slide from .431" to .4375", to use a spring from Wolff gunsmith pak #14 with OD = .433". More can be reamed out and a still better spring can be used, the guide rod must be reduced in diameter.


What does it all mean?
My conversions are much cheaper and more powerful than Dane Burns, but his look like jewelry for you ladies.

Otherguy Overby
August 3, 2006, 12:02 PM
Just how much does it take to blow up a 9X23?????

Or, are you still trying? :evil:

Clark
August 3, 2006, 09:10 PM
How long is a string?

grendelbane
August 3, 2006, 09:27 PM
According to string theory, the chambers of all pistols in the universe are conected.

They all help to aborb pressure from occasional high pressure cartridges.

However, due to the glass fibers embedded in the frames of polymer pistols, these pistols actually receive more than their fair share of high pressures.

Ka-Boom!:what:

Since 9x23mm pistols are usually constructed with steel or aluminum frames, string theory works to preserve them.

You seldom ever hear of a 9x23mm Ka-Booming.

Or maybe it has something to do with the thickness of the brass. :neener:

Clark
August 4, 2006, 10:37 AM
I believe what happened was Schrodinger wanted to put his cat in a box with a Geiger counter connected to a 9x23mm pointed at the cat.
But the cat did not like the uncertainty principal of being blown into such tiny pieces, and would rather play with a string.


Personally, 30 years ago I was intrigued when a stream of water would bend toward either a positive or negative charge. It reminded me of gravity, but then I went on to spend much more time pulling a string with a fishing pole to entice my wife's cat to pounce. By 2002, I was experimenting to see how much power I could get out of a Tokarev, and 9x23mm brass from Winchester was the key.

357 SIG with 147 grain bullets seated 1.265" and use 10mm magazines
Ever consider 40 S&W in 10mm magazines?
The brass is stronger than 10mm.

grendelbane
August 4, 2006, 08:13 PM
Ever consider 40 S&W in 10mm magazines?
The brass is stronger than 10mm.


I have loaded some 10mm length .40 S&Ws, but they were light loads. I have 2 .40 barrels, an old, ugly E-Bay barrel which looks terrible, but actually shoots pretty fair, and a nice new SS Nowlin barrel which I have not even fitted yet.

I have also tried shooting .40 S&W with moonclips in a 610. It is hard to get a good solid crimp to keep the bullet still. At regular .40 S&W lengths, the .40 brass shoots great. I have seen tools that will let you place your cannelure where you want, but I think I am probably too lazy to use one.

The .40 S&W brass has the added advantage of being able to use small rifle primers. Of course, the 9x23mm also shares this desireable trait.

Perhaps, someday, some one will produce 10mm brass which takes small pistol or rifle primers. It is possible, after all, you can now buy brand new .44 Russian brass. Brave New World, indeed!:)

cxm
August 4, 2006, 09:08 PM
CorBon loads some excellent loads for the 9x23 in addition to the WInchester stuff.

FWIW

Chuck

jjohnson
August 6, 2006, 08:47 PM
Um, don't forget, boys, the Largo is a 9x23 that's been around since Christ was a corporal. This isn't even the same story as the .44Mag morphing from the .44 Special or .357 coming from the .38 Special - the Largo dimensions are so close that when I contacted Starline to ask if THEY thought it was close enough to the 9x23 Winchester that I could use it for reloading Largo they told me yes.
I independently came to that conclusion by looking at myammo.com and actually loading ammo for my Star B 9mm Largo out of 9x23 brass. Ahaaa! Yep, it works.

The Largo in those well priced Star pistols (under $150) isn't up to snuff quite in the 9x23 Winchester pressure range (don't even try it) but it sure pushes bullets up to 147grains with real authority. 4mm more of brass than the 9mm Luger means more powder space and lower pressures. If one of you guys think you can't afford the semi-custom 9x23 Winchester Colt copies, ponder on shucking out the cash for a fling on a Spanish warhorse. The Star's not bad at all, handles very much like the M1911s we all love, and if for some reason you don't want to play with your Colt today, it's a hoot. I reload with caution, and stick with pressures my Largo was designed to handle, but with new springs, careful inspection of pistol, new Starline brass, and a ballistics program (I use Quickload) I can come up with stuff that makes steel plates fall down with regularity. That 9x23 Winchester is certainly more potent, but I don't feel undergunned much with what I have :)

jjohnson
August 6, 2006, 08:53 PM
Hey, Clark...

Could you share with me who you got to convert a Tok to 9x23? I have an extra 9mm Luger barrel for mine, and since I play a lot with 9x23 Largo I'd REALLY like to get it converted. I promise not to blow it up. I don't push my Star B too hard and I think even though the barrel of a CZ52 has that little cutout underneath, if I treat it like the Star, I should be well within sane safety limits.

So.... can you share some contact info with me please? Thanks in advance! :D

BillL223
August 7, 2006, 09:17 PM
My wife and I have been shooting CP/Winchester 9 x 23 for over ten years. Her gun was built as a Steel gun and mine was built as an IPSC Open gun. Both built by EGW. At the time we went this direction, the 9 x 23 was considered a better feeder in double stack mags as they were rimless. The 38 Super, which ruled IPSC at that time, has a small rim that could cause difficulties. The case is much stronger then a 38 Super and could be reloaded many more times. CAUTION: The Largo does not have near this case strength and should be never be loaded to Win 9 x 23 specs. After many loadings I have experienced some case cracking which is easy to see and sort out. The other probelm has been expansion of the primer pocket. This is the most likely reason to trash the case but it only happens after loading at IPSC pressure repeatedly. When used for low pressure steel loads, I think case life is extremely long. Last I bought new brass, I paid about $150/1000 for Winchester. I have used lower priced Starline "9mmSupercomp" with good results and at a lower price. I have discovered, after failing to make Major Power at an IPSC match, that Starlines have greater case capacity then Winchester 9 x 23. This is because they are not as thick in the lower part of the case and, in my opinion, are not as strong. This is a very versatile load I have loaded 95 gr steel loads up to 147 gr bowling pin loads. Current IPSC load is 121 gr Zero over VV 3N37, Steel Load is 95 gr Zero (380 bullet) over Titegroup.

jjohnson
August 8, 2006, 12:42 AM
Yeah,like he said. You can use 9x23 brass to load largo. It'll work. Great! Stronger brass, ja? True. BUT IT ALSO HAS LESS POWDER CAPACITY, WHICH MEANS HIGHER PRESSURES SO BE CAREFUL!!! It doesn't mean now you can stuff 9x23 loads into the largo. Bad, Bad idea. The old Largo guns are NOT made to handle that stuff. Don't even try. Largo is the only 9x23 weapon of any kind I have, so I know I'm not mixing loads betwee a 9x23 comp and a largo - that would be asking for a disaster.:eek:

Clark
August 8, 2006, 01:04 AM
I agree that Starline 9mm Supercomp has more volume but less strength.
For LONGSHOT that is good, for Power Pistol, that is not.



Could you share with me who you got to convert a Tok to 9x23?

1) Put a 9x23mm reamer in a lathe tailstock chuck and the barrel in the lathe headstock chuck and remove material with Sulfered cutting oil until a case will chamber with the pistols assembled.

2) Or, put a 9x23mm reamer in a drill chuck, and hold the drill chuck in the right hand and the barrel in the left hand, and give a twist of the wrist until as 9x23mm case will chamber.

3) Or, use a 115 piece drill set, a drill chuck, and two hands.
http://www.widell.com/drillsiz.html
As you can see, V drill will make a .3770" hole and a W drill will make a .3860" hole. The correct choice for lengthening the chamber is 25/64ths =.3906". This make the chamber .0060" sloppy, but that is fine.
The throat should be .357"
As you can see the T drill makes a .358" hole. that is .001" oversize
23/64 drill will make a .3594" hole, that is .0027" oversize.
U drill will make a .3680" hole, that is .011" oversize.
I find that I like the U drill better for getting the cartridge to fall in the chamber, but drill holes made with a twist of the wrist may be a few thousands small.
I seat a .358" LSWC bullet out to 1.36" and cut the throat until the cartridge falls in.

If you want 1.36" loads with 158 gr .357" and .358" bullets, then the 9x23mm reamer from Brownells is not going to do it all.

jjohnson
August 8, 2006, 10:15 AM
Thanks! But, hey, any good answer usually breeds two questions, right?:D

Let's see... first, you were expounding about getting more boost out of a Tokarev, and I just wanted to verify - were you talking specifically CZ52, Tok 33, what? Just trying to keep my head screwed on straight.

Second, your comments about reamers - and accuracy/load/bore diameters - great. Looks like first thing I should do is slug the 9mm bore of the aftermarket barrel I bought for my CZ52. I was told by somebody else they have inherently soft recoil lugs and should be re-heat treated. Go figure - made in Korea was what another poster said. Of course, the object is to get all of the boost I can out of a 9x23 chamber in a CZ52 while staying withing safe limits, so if all this works, I'll be using stout loads... and beating the soft parts of the pistol sillly.

I haven't priced the reamers at brownell's but I'm reluctant to put more in a reamer I'll use once than what I paid for the barrel. I'll have to ponder that one :scrutiny: Some of these 'oh what the hell' projects go past making sense. Well.... not that they HAVE to. ;)

Thanks for your help. I'm gonna go find my Cerrosafe and mike that barrel. :evil:

Jspy
August 8, 2006, 09:20 PM
After reading some of the newer posts on this topic, I seem to remember in doing research that the 9x23 case was similar in design to a rifle cartridge, meaning it had a double wall in the ass end to handle the increased pressure. I don't reload, but that may be why the cases might last a little longer. Reading this thread again makes me want to dig out my Colt 9x23.

Clark
August 8, 2006, 11:35 PM
JJ,
T33
I have Russian, Polish, China military, and China export T33 Tokarevs.
They are all good except the China 213 9mm only.

Yes, some China 9mm barrels are as big as the SAAMI specs for 9mm; .359" grooves.


Don't even THINK about hot rodding a CZ52 up to 9x23mm.

Jspy,
The Win 9x23 is heavy like .223 brass
The Starline 9mm Supercomp is thin like 380 brass.
With case support, both will deliver more recoil than you want.

jjohnson
August 8, 2006, 11:52 PM
Thanks, I was beginning to believe that's exactly where you were headed with your comments being 'Tok' (which is what some people call the round, hence my confusion). I understand they're meatier where it counts than the CZ52, so I'm staying on the safe side of what you're loading. It caught my eye you're using 158 grains, which will for sure work if my barrel mikes on the fat side of the expected .355. That would be FINE by me. My goal here is to get all I can out of my spare CZ52 in the 9mm barrel, not blow it up. We're talking Largo here. And since it's a spare barrel anyway, if the chamber isn't exactly Czech Spec, but works, so what? I may go the drill press method you suggested unless I can locate somebody who'd rent me a reamer for a weekend. I appreciate your taking the time to post answers.:D

UncleBob
August 9, 2006, 02:15 AM
Great thread. I recently came across a brand new 9x23 barrel and never even heard of it. Now to figure out what to do with the barrel.

Marshall
August 10, 2006, 09:40 PM
Holy Thread Resurrection Moly! :what:

Three years ago, damn! Kind of has me hyped up on 9X23 again. :D

srtboise
August 11, 2006, 12:25 PM
Great thread. I recently came across a brand new 9x23 barrel and never even heard of it. Now to figure out what to do with the barrel.

it is useless. you can send it to me and i will properly dispose of it for you...free of charge :D

steve

dougader
January 6, 2007, 04:49 PM
I love the 9x23. I bought SA 1911 that had some work done to it but could never get it to run reliably. The rounds always nose-dived into the magazine. I was told to get Wolff extra power magazine springs but the i needed cash and that was the first gun to go since it was worth so much more than my others. I really miss it.

The Winchester brass is very strong. I bought 1,000 rounds and then bought some factory Winchester ammo as well. I've loaded every thing from light practice loads, 125 grain RNL @ 1,000 fps and up: 115 jhp @ 1600 fps, 124 xtp @ 1523 fps and 147 xtp @ 1365 fps. The Hornady xtp's are my favorite bullet for accuracy and SD, but at top speeds they can come apart (which is only really a concern if you're hunting deer or something similar). The Speer Gold Dot holds together better than any othe bullet I've tried... and I'm not talking about their .357 Sig bullet... just the regular 9mm 124 grain slug.

I loaded with BlueDot but it's relatively bulky and I ran out of space in the case for real sizzling velocity. AA#7 burns very clean, meters well and comes up with great velocity and low extreme spread. The same goes for Viht 3N37. I have yet to try Power Pistol but think it has promise too.

I tried the HS6 with 9mm in the past and it wasn't very clean. But I have been assured by a friend in OK that it burns very clean at 9x23 pressures... much as was my experience with AA#7.

BTW, I always use small rifle primers. I happen to have a huge lot of CCI 400 primers so that's what I used.

Even with screaming loads, this round recoils very little in a 1911 format. I'd like to try it in the other guns listed here, i.e., CZ/Witness, Glock 20 and the Tok's mentioned by Clark.

I'd be happy to share my loading data with the understanding that you're on you're own as they were safe in my gun but I can't say they would be safe in yours...

Clark
January 7, 2007, 01:36 AM
The Win9x23Win brass in cross section looks more like rifle brass.
The Starline 9mm Super comp in cross section looks more like pistol brass.
The Starline brass holds more powder, the Win brass holds more pressure.


I am going to get a KKM 40sw barrel for my 10mm Glock 20 and see what that pistol can really do with a small primer pocket.


I am going to get a 6mmBR reamer and see what my Mauser actions can really do with a small primer pocket.


45Colt brass can go way past 454 loads, but that large primer pocket has allot of brass around it, unlike the anemic 10mm case.

If you enjoyed reading about "9 X 23 Question?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!