Activists aiming low
Guido
November 27, 2005, 04:46 PM
This is unbelievable. I think I would break someones arm if I caught them giving something like this to my child. :cuss:
http://www.fishinghurts.com/pdfs/DaddyKillsAnimals.pdf
If you enjoyed reading about "Activists aiming low" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
GDDYUP
November 27, 2005, 05:02 PM
That's real nice. I just cannot understand the viewpoint of people who would rather choose the life of an animal over the life of a human being.
Violent criminals are no more than animals so they don't count as human beings...
LawDog
November 27, 2005, 05:13 PM
Inoculate your children early against this kind of fanaticism.
http://www.cafepress.com/gutpilestyle/139169
:evil:
LawDog
gc70
November 27, 2005, 05:24 PM
These people are seriously sick... but I will go see the caged and painted PETA girls. :evil:
Werewolf
November 27, 2005, 06:12 PM
I imagine that if one wasn't a fisherman, PETA put this into the hands of your child and you could show that it in fact injured your child psychologically (pretty gruesome stuff in that thing) that a lawsuit might be successful.
Either that or a good @ss whuppin' on the whacko that handed it out...
neoncowboy
November 27, 2005, 06:12 PM
That's real nice. I just cannot understand the viewpoint of people who would rather choose the life of an animal over the life of a human being.
That's easy. They're called 'humanists' and in their mind, there is no difference in the moral value of the life of an animal, than the life of a person. Actually, since they believe people generate all of the evil in the world, they sort of accept animals as being of greater value than people.
It's a sick and twisted worldview, exactly opposite to the view of life and the world given us by God, the author of life.
This is one of many examples of the idiocy people fall into when they live life separate from God.
gc70
November 27, 2005, 06:39 PM
They're called 'humanists... they believe people generate all of the evil in the worldYes, and I think each and every one of them could make the ultimate personal sacrifice to reduce evil in the world.:evil:
Spot77
November 27, 2005, 06:57 PM
Sexist swines.
A lot of mommys like to kill too ya' know. :neener:
Kim
November 27, 2005, 07:13 PM
Actually they have already put out a Your Momma Kills Book.
wingnutx
November 27, 2005, 07:43 PM
The 'mommy kills animals' one was better, imho.
strambo
November 27, 2005, 08:32 PM
Someone ought to do a "PETA Kills" book about all the sweet puppies and kitties they kill at astronomical rates at their "shelters". I believe charges were recently filed against people at one of these PETA animal death factories. Not like the local SPCA by any means. Hypocrites.
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/
http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=87943&ran=155298&tref=po
fisherman66
November 27, 2005, 08:53 PM
How funny.
What about the broccoli's feelings? Stop lettuce decapitation!
mountainclmbr
November 27, 2005, 08:55 PM
How about a book titled "Totalitarian Socialists like us (PETA) Killed 250 Million People last Century, and we are Just Getting Started".
Lupinus
November 27, 2005, 09:04 PM
How about we hand their kids a "My Daddy knows the food chain" comic book? Maybe a "Your Daddy is an animal killer and a liar, at least my Daddy is honest about it and isn't a liar" comic? :D
rbernie
November 27, 2005, 09:18 PM
If someone handed this to my kids, they'd probably reply, "Yeah, my daddy kills animals so I can eat meat. Who kills your meat?".
They may never hunt or fish, but they bloody well understand the simple facts of biological consumption.
fisherman66
November 27, 2005, 09:18 PM
While it may seem obvious that fish are able to feel pain, like every other animal, some people still think of fish as swimming vegetables. In fact, regarding the ability to feel pain, fish are equal to dogs, cats, and all other animals. Dr. Donald Broom, scientific advisor to the British government, explains that “The scientific literature is quite clear. Anatomically, physiologically and biologically, the pain system in fish is virtually the same as in birds and animals.”
Birds AND animals?
:scrutiny:
Spec ops Grunt
November 27, 2005, 09:48 PM
You can tell its evil and not true because it is in PDF format.
Sindawe
November 27, 2005, 10:26 PM
If someone handed this to my kids, they'd probably reply, "Yeah, my daddy kills animals so I can eat meat. Who kills your meat?".
They may never hunt or fish, but they bloody well understand the simple facts of biological consumption.PeTA advocates a vegetable based diet, with no meat or dairy, so no meat on the table.
Which is fine when it is a personal choice (as it was for me for eight years) and those making the choice don't attempt to pressure others into following suit. Which the noted pamphlet is NOT an example of. :fire:That's easy. They're called 'humanists' and in their mind, there is no difference in the moral value of the life of an animal, than the life of a person. Actually, since they believe people generate all of the evil in the world, they sort of accept animals as being of greater value than people.
It's a sick and twisted worldview, exactly opposite to the view of life and the world given us by God, the author of life.
This is one of many examples of the idiocy people fall into when they live life separate from God. Uhmmm...neoncowboy, your ignorance is showing.
http://www.humanistsofutah.org/what.htmlWhat about the broccoli's feelings? LET THE RABBITS WEAR GLASSES!!!!
Yep, once again PeTA has strayed from their original purpose and goals.
Standing Wolf
November 27, 2005, 10:27 PM
Dr. Donald Broom, scientific advisor to the British government, explains that “The scientific literature is quite clear. Anatomically, physiologically and biologically, the pain system in fish is virtually the same as in birds and animals.”
British science seems to be a lot like British civil rights: essentially non-existent.
coylh
November 27, 2005, 10:33 PM
I might agree with the underlying points, but not with the method of communicating them (propoganda).
It's more honest just to say "fishing causes pain to fish" and let the reader decide for himself what that means to him.
fisherman66
November 27, 2005, 10:51 PM
It's more honest just to say "fishing causes pain to fish" and let the reader decide for himself what that means to him.
In a world devoid of pain; there'd be no pleasure. Without death, there'd be no life. Without the Senko, I'd catch much fewer fish.
Mad Chemist
November 27, 2005, 11:20 PM
LET THE RABBITS WEAR GLASSES!!!!.
Is that a Maynard quote?
Life feeds on life.
Just goes to show how willfully ignorant "true believers"(of any stripe)can be.
BTW there is a huge friggin' difference between a fish brain and a mammalian one. IT IS CALLED A NEOCORTEX YOU BLISSNINNY IDIOTS!:cuss: :banghead: :fire:
If these people ever used their's they might be doing something more productive than scarring little children.
The last time these jerks came to campus, I hung out w/ a bag of beef jerky.
F@#% 'em, they are lying, self serving, propagandists. The bulk of their followers have the intellectual robustness of a chronic glue-sniffer.:D
Zundfolge
November 27, 2005, 11:23 PM
You can tell its evil and not true because it is in PDF format.
And looking at the crop marks and slug line, it was obviously built in QuarkXpress (work of the devil Quark is)
Manedwolf
November 27, 2005, 11:26 PM
I imagine that if one wasn't a fisherman, PETA put this into the hands of your child and you could show that it in fact injured your child psychologically (pretty gruesome stuff in that thing) that a lawsuit might be successful.
Either that or a good @ss whuppin' on the whacko that handed it out...
If you ever run into a PETA sort, point out to them that they're wearing leather shoes and/or belt and/or jacket, as they often are.
Ask them to justify that hypocrisy.
If they want to be good little moonbat victims themselves, fine, but I hate hypocrites, and HANDS OFF my freedoms.
Sindawe
November 27, 2005, 11:27 PM
Is that a Maynard quote? :D
yorec
November 27, 2005, 11:38 PM
I'd like to see these idiots actually practice what they preach... Live without causing another living organism death. That means no eating the flesh of any other creature, be it vegtable or animal.
Good riddance to all who make the commitment and stay with it.
Spot77
November 27, 2005, 11:43 PM
Didn't I read somewhere that one of the PETA Directors was an insulin dependent diabetic?
Where do they think that insulin comes from? Mined from the earth?
(For those who may not know, most, if not all insulin comes from pigs)
fisherman66
November 27, 2005, 11:47 PM
And the angel of the lord came unto me snatching me up from my place of slumber. And took me on high and higher still until we moved to the spaces between the air itself. And he brought me into a vast farmlands of our own midwest. And as we descended cries of impending doom rose from the soil. One thousand nay a million voices full of fear. And terror possesed me then. And I begged Angel of the Lord what are these tortured screams? And the angel said unto me These are the cries of the carrots the cries of the carrots!You see Reverend Maynard, tomorrow is harvest day and to them it is the holocaust. And I sprang from my slumber drenched in sweat like the tears of one million terrified brothers and roared, Hear me now, I have seen the light!They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers!
What's up doc?
Mad Chemist
November 27, 2005, 11:58 PM
Bwahahahahahah!:D
I new that sounded familiar.
Dionysusigma
November 28, 2005, 12:07 AM
http://www.onlinesports.com/images/toon-groucho.jpeg
This...
Is...
Necessary...
:evil:
Anyhoo, why don't we pass out literature that both PITA... I, uh... I mean, PeTA, and hunters can agree on? Something talking about the "deplorable conditions at the slaughterhouse" and "what foie gras really is," so that people would rather go out and hunt animals in their natural habitat (as nature intended) instead of buying cheap meat at Wal-Mart.
Kim
November 28, 2005, 12:21 AM
Well I am a hunter and I disagree with your "deplorable practices" stuff. I do not wish to go back and live in (how far would we have to go to find no slaughter houses) dunno. I want food to be cheap and plentiful for the whole world. I do not want to consider progress that is really regression. Good Grief. Must we really repeat that history. :confused:
Dionysusigma
November 28, 2005, 12:24 AM
:rolleyes: It was a joke... :rolleyes:
Kim
November 28, 2005, 12:31 AM
Sorry------give me a dunce hat. ;) Sarcasm on the net is sometimes hard to get as you can not see the persons face and boady language.
fisherman66
November 28, 2005, 12:46 AM
I think Elmer Fudd hunts with an Ithica shotgun.
Anyone read "The Jungle"? I love my meat (food), but I can't eat hot dogs any more.
joab
November 28, 2005, 01:10 AM
"Until your dady learns that it is not fun to kill,
Keep your doggies and kitties away from him.
He's so hooked on killing defenseless animal
That they could be next."
Priceless, just effin priceless
Chrontius
November 28, 2005, 01:48 AM
Didn't I read somewhere that one of the PETA Directors was an insulin dependent diabetic?
Where do they think that insulin comes from? Mined from the earth?
(For those who may not know, most, if not all insulin comes from pigs)
Sorry, I gotta call BS on this one. Most insulin in our brave new world comes from genetically modified eschericia coli bacteria (iirc) which produces honest-to-god (well, at least his blueprint) human insulin, with none of the nasty desensitization that happens when using porcine insulin.
Yes, and I think each and every one of them could make the ultimate personal sacrifice to reduce evil in the world.:evil:
No, you see -- that would kill all their gut bacteria who've kept them alive all these years. They can't have that now, can they? :D
coylh
November 28, 2005, 02:04 AM
Maybe they're taking things too literally.
And God said, "Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit; you shall have them for food.
Cosmoline
November 28, 2005, 02:59 AM
If anyone hands this to a minor child, they should be the subject of a restraining order and a suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress--ALONG WITH PETA. Making some kid think her father is a murderer is practically an invitation to be sued. Hopefully someone will take them up on it. The jury pool up here is itching to destroy PETA.
c_yeager
November 28, 2005, 07:45 AM
Where do they think that insulin comes from? Mined from the earth?
It comes from engineered bacteria, then again, bacteria has feelings too :-( and PETA has come out *strongly* against any sort of genetic engineering for any reason at all, so the president's hypocrisy is still evident, just not in the same way.
They may never hunt or fish, but they bloody well understand the simple facts of biological consumption.
They actually dont. The PETA rank and file has been so brainwashed that they have no understanding of this whatsoever.
Yep, once again PeTA has strayed from their original purpose and goals.
Having met a few who ran local PETA 'chapters' (or whatever they call them) it seems that they are right on track with their goals, to get attention from the 'squares' and further their socialist one-world agenda where human starvation can once again be used as a weapon.
The Crazy Gobbo
November 28, 2005, 08:16 AM
Didn't I read somewhere that one of the PETA Directors was an insulin dependent diabetic?
On Penn & Teller's PETA episode they have Mary Beth Sweetland (senior VP of PETA) as down for a daily injection of insulin. P&T lead up to this segment showing PETA to be against animal testing, and saying that dogs were used in the case of insulin.
I'm unclear however, where animals play a part in the ingredients, but that won't stop me from enjoying Sweetland's defense. :neener:
It goes,
she admits her meds "...still contain some animal products."
Sweetland says
"I don't see myself as a hypocrite. I need my life to fight for the rights of animals."
:rolleyes:
BTW Ted Nugent is also in this episode! :evil:
svtruth
November 28, 2005, 08:35 AM
Then, Dr. Broom, how come trout on catch and release rivers get caught over and over?
Manedwolf
November 28, 2005, 09:13 AM
I think Elmer Fudd hunts with an Ithica shotgun.
Anyone read "The Jungle"? I love my meat (food), but I can't eat hot dogs any more.
Worse, there was a recent article on "garbage archaeologists" who dig into landfills to see how stuff is breaking down. Most of the contents of old landfills are an inert gray slurry, but they find hotdogs from the 1970's that still look fresh. :barf:
Mongo the Mutterer
November 28, 2005, 09:36 AM
I was stopped by a PETA type one day, who gave me a brochure which suggested a boycott of Petsmart because they use "puppy mills".
Looked at the brochure and the lady and asked her "then what are you for, free range puppies?"
She returned a dumb look, and I backed up my statement by finishing with "Lady, buy a dog, name it Life, then you will have one..."
rbernie
November 28, 2005, 11:42 AM
Sindawe said: PeTA advocates a vegetable based diet, with no meat or dairy, so no meat on the table. Well, I used to be a vegetarian (vegan) and I belonged to PETA. And IMO they're generally full of it.
The big problem that I have with the vegans (http://www.ivu.org/faq/definitions.html) is that they consume products on a daily basis that came about as the result of the death of an animal - and pretend not to. They forgo the cheeseburgers, but they still use hundreds and hundreds of household products that contain byproducts that can only be obtained via the death of an animal. I'm not just talking about not buying leather shoes, belts, and wallets in favor of vegetable-based alternatives; I'm talking about being willing to exorcize animal-derived oils/fats/collegen/bonemeal from the products that one would normally consume. To me, it just seems hypocritical to suggest some moral superiority based upon not eating animal muscle tissue while still consuming products made from other aspects of the dead animal's structure. No - PETA vegans are generally intelligent but lazy hypocrites, IMO.
Of course, the majority of PETA bliss-ninny's don't even take things that far. They perceive eating domesticated livestock as good ("They're RAISED to be food, so it's OK") and eating wild game as bad ("They're wild and free and pretty and somehow better than domesticated stock, and therefore shouldn't be harmed by the evil gun-toting rednecks"). It's pointless to argue with them because they're so far removed from rational coherent thought that they're only worth my pity - they don't even rate scorn.
If you enjoyed reading about "Activists aiming low" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.