Pet Peeves, Part 3, Illiteracy.


Jim Watson
January 7, 2006, 12:52 PM
There is a substantial minority of posts by people who are apparently either functional illiterates with computer access or are so hurried and careless that a decipherable post is of no value to them. I don't mean the occasional misspelled word or grammatical error, I do those myself. I mean the full length screwups that make a post hard to read at all. I see three basic types:

1. Truly illiterate. There are posts that are hardly to be considered English. They lack punctuation, spelling, and grammar. Meaning may or may not be clear.

2. California Girl. There is more and more usage of abbreviations that I think come from cel phone text messaging. r u abl 2 c wht i mean?

3. No pinkie. There are posts written in clear and proper language but whose author does not use the shift key. Even when well punctuated they are hard to get through. I am more mystified by the ones with proper nouns capitalized but not the first word of the sentences.

Does this sort of stuff bother you? It does me, it makes it hard to comprehend.
Do you wade through it and try to get the content? Sometimes I do, sometimes I give up a line or two in. Sometimes I will be mean enough to respond in the same dialect.

If you enjoyed reading about "Pet Peeves, Part 3, Illiteracy." here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!
January 7, 2006, 12:57 PM
Glad I'm not the only one who feels this way. I do my best to ignore functionally illiterate posts.

January 7, 2006, 12:57 PM
I'm thinking about only posting in L33T from now on.

And an online translator.....

So with that in mind:

I 4l50 H47e 70 Re4D P057z 7h@ 4re N07 WELl wrI77eN 4nd PH0RM477ED, 8u7 i7'Z 4 5IGN 0F 7Eh 7imez.

beaucoup ammo
January 7, 2006, 01:05 PM
That pretty much sums it up. Before launching a critique of fellow posters, I'd want to know WHY they post as they do. Perhaps someone, in fact, lost a pinkie or a hand. Ever consider that? Some of us never finished High School, yet enjoy the company of other's with a common interest..regardless of their "grammatical error."

A person's situation translates to their posts and, speaking for myself, I have no clue where folks are coming from.

"Sometimes I will be mean enough to respond in the same dialect." That doesn't come as a surprise.

Take Care

January 7, 2006, 01:11 PM
Yep, it bothers me, too.

Before the "You're all elitist jerks" chorus starts up, I'll add that some posters among those who DO know (more-or-less) how to use the language, continue to insist that it really doesn't matter!

Say What???

If one is trying to COMMUNICATE thoughts and ideas to readers on the 'net, meaning: via the PRINTED WORD, is it not desireable to do so in the clearest possible fashion? Is it not logical to at least TRY to perform the transmission of one's thoughts in a manner that allows the greatest possibility for readers to actually comprehend what is being written?

Clearly, for some people, that's a leap of logic which they are either unwilling to take, or afraid to attempt.

I'll always try to decipher anyone's post, and don't "look down" on those who may have problems with the language. However, it is certainly easier to get the drift of a comment or idea when an earnest attempt is made by the writer to get it down in the best fashion he can. Careful proof-reading before posting is also a fine idea.

Here come the slings and arrows....

January 7, 2006, 01:12 PM
While I do admit it's tiresome to try to read poorly written posts, I usually just pass by them. This isn't grammar school, it's a gun forum in written English. If you can't do the written English part . . .


January 7, 2006, 01:15 PM
Not finding much gun-related content here, but have to say I agree with the original poster.

If you want folks to read your posts, please make them readable!


If you enjoyed reading about "Pet Peeves, Part 3, Illiteracy." here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!