[Erik]

OK, so how good is the G-Code paddle?

Compared to, say, the G-Code with a "traditional" belt attachment?

(Basically, I'm flip-flopping on which to order. Yes, I know that I can order both. ;) )

Thanks - Erik

[Sven]

I like the paddle... it rides deep and locks around your belt or the edge of your clothes. The gun is held securely but can be pulled out with a little *CLICK*, and the holster stays in place.

[Oleg Volk]

Have both, use the paddle. For me, it is secure enough and allows removal of the gun and holster if I need to take off my jacket at work (can wrap the hoslter in the jacket when it comes off, no one sees it happen). My thought on GCodes can be summed up thusly:
http://www.olegvolk.net/newphotos/tn/gcode/slimstrongsecure_s.jpg

(Much better than Fobus. I dumped all of those.)

[Sven]

Those jeans look familiar... wait a second... that's MY (gun) butt!

[gunnersalley]

Erik,

My .02 worth on this topic. The G-CODE paddle design is one of the best on the market. As a matter of fact, some leather holster makers have started using the G-CODE paddle on their leather paddle rigs. Retention on the belt is excellent, and it even holds well on pants alone. The design pulls the holster in close to the body, but not so close as to impede a full firing grip.

In comparison to the belt model versus the paddle, I personally prefer the paddle for the ease of removing off the belt. The belt attachments do have a built-in ride height adjustment not found on the paddle. (The paddle requires an add-on attachment called a "mid-low adapter" to lower the paddle height).

My opinions are based on both my personal use and Gunnersalley.com sales of the G-CODE line. From a sales perspective, customer satisfaction/response to the G-CODE line has been outstanding.

Please let us know if you have any more questions regarding the G-CODE line as we'll be glad to try and help.