Michael Moore Slams Bush in Texas
NIGHTWATCH
April 16, 2003, 12:16 PM
His next film is set to disclose terrorist ties between Bush and OBL? Why cant this fat pig fall on a pitchfork? :banghead:
I voted in the poll that he is going WAY overboard. :fire:
Article (http://www.wnbc.com/entertainment/2115281/detail.html)
If you enjoyed reading about "Michael Moore Slams Bush in Texas" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
George Hill
April 16, 2003, 12:18 PM
Moore is an @ss.
Jesse H
April 16, 2003, 12:19 PM
Austin, TX is the most liberal town in Texas.
buzz_knox
April 16, 2003, 12:24 PM
This guy is begging for a slander/libel suit. He knowingly fabricates "evidence" to support his claims and promote his crap.
Justin
April 16, 2003, 12:40 PM
That guy has made a career based on the fact that people will believe anything, no matter how stupid or inane, as long as it appears on a movie or television screen. He knows that 99.99% of people never do any fact-checking, and he's capitalized on that.
Carlos Cabeza
April 16, 2003, 01:42 PM
Precisely my dear Watson ! Eh, I mean Justin !
Mr Moore insults the intelligence of the American people and lacks the decency to credibly present factual information.
Drjones
April 16, 2003, 02:07 PM
Just in case you haven't yet read it: http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html
It is worth a read.
Also stated in that link: did you know BFC is not even really a "documentary"? It is a "non-fictional film," which clearly means he can distort truth to fit his agenda.
Did I mention he's a fat idiot?
Shalako
April 16, 2003, 02:15 PM
I don't care for Michael Moore.
bountyhunter
April 16, 2003, 02:20 PM
But, you have to give him credit for chutzpah. When they asked him if he didn't hear all the people booing him at the oscars, he said it was only two people booing. When they showed him it was actually dozens of people booing, he said there was only a couple of people booing HIM and the rest of the people were booing the two people who were booing him. I wonder what color the sky is on the world that he lives in.
thumbtack
April 16, 2003, 02:30 PM
Does anyone know when and where he will be filming I would love to drive down to Austin and throw cow pies at Mr Moore or at least harass him by yelling fatty.
10-Ring
April 16, 2003, 03:15 PM
Please, stop wasting band width on that ***** :cuss: Him & his kind can go exercise their rights t free speech in Russia :fire:
Soap
April 16, 2003, 03:17 PM
Like I once heard 4V50 Gary say, the further these people go off the deep end in their views, the less they will become mainstream. Hence, they will be less of a problem.
C. H. Luke
April 16, 2003, 03:41 PM
Personally, I'd like to MeetMichael Moore......
LiquidTension
April 16, 2003, 04:04 PM
That's a really good link, definitely worth reading.
cuchulainn
April 16, 2003, 04:22 PM
DFTMM
= Don't Feed the Michael Moore
MJRW
April 16, 2003, 04:22 PM
Here's the interesting thing about Michael Moore...I don't care. Really, I just don't care what this guy does or says. He's like an obnoxious child who insults adults trying to make the adults laugh but doesn't understand humor yet.
JW2
April 16, 2003, 07:07 PM
Well I have never seen this "documentary" before but I just downloaded it (I know, I know.... but there's no way I'm contributing to this guy's wealth or success :fire: ).
I expect to be :barf: by the end...
Stevie-Ray
April 16, 2003, 07:10 PM
The Michael Moores of the world are only part of the problem. The rest of the problem is divided between the liberal politicians that would use him/his ilk and the vast percentage of idiotic Americans that would take this crap as gospel without further study.
Bruce H
April 16, 2003, 07:23 PM
What he needs is an old fashioned A** whoopin. The problem is with the size of it a person would have to bring lunch, dinner and a cot.
cool45auto
April 16, 2003, 07:27 PM
:D :D :D
Sgt
April 16, 2003, 07:30 PM
Oh I don't know....I think I could whoop that fat a$$ tub of crap without bringing anything more than a granola bar...:p
He would have made a great "Human Shield" don't you think?
Semper Fi, Sgt
Shoeless
April 16, 2003, 08:11 PM
I will pray extra hard that this deluded, self-important pig fabricates just enough of his "documentary" to get himself a gigantic slander (or is it libel?) lawsuit slapped on him and he goes broke and gets exposed for the liar that he is.
Shoeless
Bruce H
April 16, 2003, 08:37 PM
But But But he is an artiste, just ask him. There is no way that a libel or slander will ever stick to him. Him and those of his ilk will beat everybody to death with the first ammendment if this is tried, and rightfully so. How about just proiving him wrong in everything he does. Make sure there is absolute proof that he is fabricating.
El Tejon
April 16, 2003, 08:45 PM
Shoeless, defamation.:)
As to Michael, let him dig away!:D
Skunkabilly
April 16, 2003, 08:48 PM
Well, gotta give him credit. At least he's doing it in Texas and not Mother England! :D :D :D
ed dixon
April 16, 2003, 08:55 PM
Michael Moore is clearly a petulant self-important jackass who seems to reach conclusions first and then mold the available facts to fit them. But... the number of former high-level government employees who get on their knees for Saudi (et al.) paychecks is another disgrace.
JW2
April 16, 2003, 09:38 PM
Ok, I just finished watching this disasterpiece, and aside from the obvious :cuss: , I just want to know one thing: where is the focus? What is he trying to say with this film? What is the thesis? It bounces around from one seemingly unrelated topic to another. This is the most unfocused piece of work I have ever seen. If this were a high school paper, I think it would not get a passing grade.
Its just unfortunate and disgusting that the general public will watch this and just accept what he says as fact.
Hard Charger
April 16, 2003, 10:04 PM
Imagine that, a liberal director attacking a liberal president. Whooda thunk it?
Wasn't Bush's support of the "assault weapons ban" supposed to warm him up to people like Moore?
I have no smpathy for Bush when he gets attacked. Let the dogs have him.
MeekandMild
April 16, 2003, 11:52 PM
According to AP, Moore told the Austin American-Statesman prior to his lecture Monday night that 90 percent of the response to his diatribes against Bush has been positive, and that he hasn't received any death threats. Moore said to the crowd, jokingly, "Should I be getting death threats? It is pretty risky of me to be coming to Texas, don't you think?" I for one would never wish death on him. I look forward to the time when he will be wetting his pants in a nursing home.
clem
April 17, 2003, 12:35 AM
I wonder how he would be received if he wrote a book called "Stupid Black Men" instead of "Stupid White Men"?
thaddeus
April 17, 2003, 02:22 AM
The moore he talks, the moore credibility he loses.
Let the idiot blather away all he wants. Give him a bullhorn.
Nightcrawler
April 17, 2003, 02:46 AM
Hell, he might be coming to NMU.
You know that bank that he got the rifle from for buying a CD in his movie? That was MY BANK. It's across the street from my dorm.
He's one of the people the school is looking at paying to come here next year. They might get Alan Keyes, too. I'd much rather listen to Mr. Keyes.
PATH
April 17, 2003, 02:50 AM
He is just one of those fellas you'd like to slap upside his head with a sockful of fecal matter!:evil:
twoblink
April 17, 2003, 03:24 AM
Hitler said, if you make the lie big enough, and repeat it often enough, people will start to believe it. Was it hitler that said that?? Or his PR guy?
Anyway, MM is trying that theory out...
I know a few Marine bases in TX filled with people who'd just love to have him say that to his face ;)
illuminatus99
April 17, 2003, 06:28 AM
twoblink: it was goebbles (hitlers propaganda man) but it still rings true
Kentucky Rifle
April 17, 2003, 08:08 AM
It's raining in Kentucky this morning~So I hurt all over. I've got a really foul mood worked up. However, I'm with you. This ol' bucket-mouth Moore needs a can of WHOOP-A$$ opened on him. Show his fat behind that thing of which reality, really consists.
KR
Partisan Ranger
April 17, 2003, 09:58 AM
Like many elite leftists, Moore feigns concern for 'the little guy,' while living in a posh multi-million dollar flat in Manhattan.
Moore would never need a gun for self-defense. He has bodyguards, lives in only super rich neighborhoods and burly doormen who keep the riff raff out.
Of all species of liberal, it's limosuine liberals that make me want to :barf: the most.
Meow
April 17, 2003, 11:57 AM
would that be a R-I-F-L-E on Michael Moore's shoulder
NIGHTWATCH
April 17, 2003, 12:34 PM
What disturbs me about Moore and his work, besides being the leftist anti-american, anti-conservative and anti-gun rant that it is, is the fact that the ACADEMY saw fit to award him? :scrutiny:
If they had any integrity, he would never have been nominated in the first place. Documentaries are supposed to be factual as well as entertaining. And I think they need to retrieve that award from his fat smelly hands. :uhoh:
Russ
April 17, 2003, 04:01 PM
Nightwatch,
He might fall on a pitchfork one day. I'm pretty sure he eats with one!
clem
April 24, 2003, 12:04 AM
Nightwatch,
And the acadamy gave an award to a child rapist too.
rick458
April 24, 2003, 02:07 AM
Micheal Moore didn't bash Bush in TEXAS he did it in AUSTIN, it ceceeded from the state a long time ago
Justin
April 24, 2003, 02:19 AM
I think this one would fit better over in Legal and Political.
HBK
April 24, 2003, 02:31 AM
Michael Moore has profited more off of gun violence, particularly school shooitngs, than anyone in America. He disgusts me. He is above all other things, a liar. I do not like that man.:fire:
Justin Moore
April 24, 2003, 06:36 AM
I'll say it yet again, I don't much care for Michael Moore.
But, there ARE things that need examined.
http://commons.somewhere.com/rre/2001/RRE.Summary.Carlyle.Grou.html
In late September The Wall Street Journal touched on salient aspects of the story last month by highlighting the bin Laden family investments in the Carlyle Group, then dropped it like a hot 'tater. "Bin Laden Family Could Profit From a Jump In Defense Spending Due to Ties to U.S. Bank", by Daniel Golden, James Bandler, and Marcus Walker, The Wall Street Journal, 9/28/01
After the WSJ story, Judicial Watch spokesman Larry Klayman posted a release uppping the ante. He was again ignored by the mainstream when he said, "This conflict of interest has now turned into a scandal. The idea of the President's father, an ex-president himself, doing business with a company under investigation by the FBI in the terror attacks of September 11 is horrible. President Bush should not ask, but demand, that his father pull out of the Carlyle Group."
Now, Klayman and the WSJ are hardly 'left wingers'. I seem to recall Klayman relentlessly targeting the corrupt Clinton regieme.
He was one of Willie's main scourges.
It remains undisputed that Bush I was/is heavily involved in the Carlyle Group. If I recall correctly so is/was Brent Scocroft.
Whoops its not Scocroft ;)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0111.whoswho.html
Like many magazines, The Washington Monthly often gets letters from eccentrics insisting that a cabal of powerful men secretly controls world events. A recent story makes you understand why they might think that way. According to The Wall Street Journal, Saudi Arabia's Binladen Group, the construction company owned by the family of Osama bin Laden (from whom Osama is estranged), has more than $2 million invested in a military contractor buy-out fund managed by the Carlyle Group. Carlyle's chairman is ex-Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci. Its senior counselor is former Secretary of State James Baker. The senior adviser to the firm's Asian Partners fund is former President George H.W. Bush.
I bet the White House is actually pleased as hell that Moore is doing the film. If you want to discredit information that perhaps DOES have legs, who better to do it? Look at the reaction (rightfully so, 98 percent of the time) Moore gets on places like this board.
gudel
April 24, 2003, 10:21 AM
let's not give this guy any more "15minutes" fame. his time is up.
hush hush about this guy. no audience, the guy is silenced.
Oleg Volk
April 24, 2003, 11:45 AM
In other, equally importrant news, my cat had a hairball. What that Moore thing does or utters is hardly profound...
Carlos Cabeza
April 24, 2003, 11:53 AM
New category for the Oscars, BEST "CROCK"UMENTARY
As in "Crock Of ______ !";)
CMichael
April 24, 2003, 12:37 PM
:barf: :barf: :barf: :barf: :barf:
What else can I say?
Satellite
April 24, 2003, 10:28 PM
You "Bushies" need to calm down. I'm sure that Michael Moore will cancel his little documentary on Bush once he finds that Bush is on the same side of the 2nd Amendment issue that he is.
edamon
April 25, 2003, 04:54 AM
he's a giant jackass.
i'd love to punch that tub of crap square in the face.
that bowling for colombine was a disastor of a movie. it's almost
like he's got ADD. the story jumped all over the place (never mind the factless facts).
clem
July 4, 2003, 02:16 PM
Go here and down load a form letter to send in to revoke his Acadamy Award:
http://www.revoketheoscar.com/
:mad:
wingman
July 4, 2003, 04:28 PM
I always believe M. Moore and Rosie O'donnel were one in the same, any
truth to that.?:confused:
Alan Smithiee
July 4, 2003, 08:30 PM
I weight more than he does, what does his weight have to do with his stupidity or politics or moral corruption?
I don't see you guys screaming about the child rapist who was given Best Director at that same awards show.
jimpeel
July 4, 2003, 10:21 PM
BFC ... hmm ... just one step below BFD.
kentucky bucky
July 6, 2003, 02:47 PM
This is a perfect example of a outcast chubby kid that is now exploiting a Hollywood Liberal niche. He finally feels wanted or cool for the first time in his life and will run out of shock value and self destruct eventually. His talent is non-exsitant and he is only in the news because he has become the "darling" of the liberals. The idiot could fart on a rock and Hollyweird would call it art. Easy come, easy go.
bjengs
July 7, 2003, 01:26 AM
Justin,
Yeah, funny isn't it that Larry Klayman's face was all over the place (FOX news esp.) if he had any thing going against the Clinton administration or Hillary.
Seen him much lately?
Satellite,
I don't think that comment was very cool. Everyone on this board seems to understand that Bush is very devoted to the RKBA.
:rolleyes:
WonderNine
July 7, 2003, 02:02 AM
Everyone on this board seems to understand that Bush is very devoted to the RKBA.
Okaaaaayyyy :D :D :D :D :D ;)
Let's just say I agree AND disagree with that statement. :(
4v50 Gary
July 7, 2003, 02:09 AM
Michael Moore is perhaps the most brillant propagandist of our time. All is stuph is fictional yet folks believe it. Geobbels would be proud.
Now, what does it take to convince him to do some filming in Liberia? I understand there's a civil war brewing down there and perhaps he can attribute that to Bush. He should go there to do some investigative reporting. If he survives, then he needs to do a hit piece on the White South Africans. Better yet, he doesn't even need to leave the USA. Just go to the 'hood in Los Angeles to do a hit piece there. If we're lucky, he'll never get out.
gunsmith
July 7, 2003, 05:38 AM
his big lie is the issue,not how big he is!
Alan Smithiee
July 7, 2003, 01:39 PM
"I don't think that comment was very cool. Everyone on this board seems to understand that Bush is very devoted to the RKBA."
well, I can't say I agree at all, I'm still waiting for all those Royal Decrees, er Executive Orders affecting RKBA and ownership (the ones his Daddy and Slick Willy signed) that he promised to revoked to be revoked. he said he was going to, still hasn't done it, and he has said he will sign any extension on the AWB.
still see his AG still prosecuting gun owners.
talks the talk, don't see no walkin....
bjengs
July 7, 2003, 03:26 PM
The "rolling eyes" smilie-face was supposed to indicate the sarcasm in my post.
HBK
July 7, 2003, 03:53 PM
The Child Rapist didn't lie in his documentary. I think it's horrible what Polanski did, but it had nothing to do with his movie. Did he deserve an Oscar? I don't know, I didn't see the movie because I don't use my money to support pedophiles. He doesn't deserve his freedom and at least will stay the hell out of the US to keep it. Moore didn't deserve his Oscar because he LIED and distorted facts in a so called documentary. That's the difference, Moore's Oscar could and should be revoked. Still, the world would be a better place without them.
Alan Smithiee
July 8, 2003, 12:05 PM
makeing a propaganda movie is worse than child rape????
I think I need to go somewhere else for a while..
HBK
July 8, 2003, 02:40 PM
I didn't say it was worse. Reread my post. You are oversimplifying my statement. Moore broke the rules and should not be awarded an Oscar. I do not support Polanski films, but there's nothing I can do about his child rape. If you don't have the intelligence to see what I'm saying, then by all means, please do go somewhere else for a while.
Alan Smithiee
July 8, 2003, 09:29 PM
I still don't see the difference, the Academy gave an award to a Convicted Child Rapist and Fugitive from American Justice, would they have given the award to Charles Manson if he had made a movie?
How about if Bin Lauden made the movie? would we be screaming about that?
thats what I am talking about, a group that doesn't see a problem with ignoring that kind of behaviour. instead they ignore it and give him a big pat on the back. giveing MM a statue for lieing in a propanganda piece (and they knew it was a propaganda piece) is minor. it is an example of the mind set of a major part of American Media.
HBK
July 9, 2003, 12:54 AM
I see what you're saying. I agree.
Alan Smithiee
July 9, 2003, 12:40 PM
thank you, I wasn't refering to you in particular. I was refering to what seems to be our collective mindset...
you scream about them giveing an award to a Convicted Child Rapist makes a lot more waves and brings a lot more attention than screaming about something that a large % of the population believes and supports.
it's like the Reporter for The Times. or Beallis. first him, then a whole domino line of others...
If you enjoyed reading about "Michael Moore Slams Bush in Texas" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.