bg
March 8, 2006, 02:56 PM
This has got to be one of the most moronic things to happen.
A bill that would keep others from knowing who has a CCW
dies. Those who opposed it say there is no proof harm comes
from the lists being open for access..Now let's see here.
Someone gets the name of the CCW holder and finds out
where he/she lives, then waits until this person leaves,
THEN breaks into the residence, robbing it. The targeted
home has even more chance of being hit, since there is
a real possibility that firearms might be avail in the home.
What sense does it make having the names of CCW holder
avail for posting ? Seems to me this would increase the
potential for more crime, attacks etc.
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060308/NEWS01/603080354/1056
Gun advocates say the availability of names presents a safety risk to permit holders, while those who support the media exemption say there is no proof of harm resulting from publishing the names.
A bill that would keep others from knowing who has a CCW
dies. Those who opposed it say there is no proof harm comes
from the lists being open for access..Now let's see here.
Someone gets the name of the CCW holder and finds out
where he/she lives, then waits until this person leaves,
THEN breaks into the residence, robbing it. The targeted
home has even more chance of being hit, since there is
a real possibility that firearms might be avail in the home.
What sense does it make having the names of CCW holder
avail for posting ? Seems to me this would increase the
potential for more crime, attacks etc.
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060308/NEWS01/603080354/1056
Gun advocates say the availability of names presents a safety risk to permit holders, while those who support the media exemption say there is no proof of harm resulting from publishing the names.