[fritz1]

What does every one think I was thinking of the new CZ stainless I have the 30th aniversary, or one of the FN high powers, possibly the SFS. what's every ones preference, I like both. has any one compared both side by side,

Accuracy, triger and overall feel

[Stephen A. Camp]

Hello. Though not exactly the versions you mention, here are some observations of the Hi Power vs. CZ...

http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/CZ-75%20or%20BHP.htm

Best.

[Rangegod]

In my case it’s six of one and a half dozen of the other (actually only 5 ½ CZ’s). There's no wrong choice here.

JAC

[Cliff47]

I love my HPs, each and every one of them. That said...

Once I got my CZ75B Stainless, I no longer wanted the 30th Anniversary model. The Stainless looks so good between the CZ75 Brushed Chrome and the duo-tone CZ75 Kadet, almost too pretty to shoot. Of course those are bracketed by the CZ75 Retro, and a CZ75B in a deeeep blued finish.

[Walt Sherrill]

If you don't have a HP, go for it. I'd get the standard model, without the SFS, however. (Not because there is anything wrong with that system, but because everybody ought to have at least one "traditional" BHP or FN equivalent.)

If you've got one, forget the 75B Stainless, and go for the 85 Combat, maybe in satin nickel.

I appreciate the practicality of stainless, but its not enough to make me buy a gun SOLELY because its stainless. Except for the ambi-safeties, on the 75B stainless, its still basically a 75B.

[Pilot]

I have both. Like others have said, if you already have the CZ, get the FN HP.

[fritz1]

thanks everyone it's a hard choice, I do not have a traditional high power just the Browning BDM which is actualy quite different in the action and not as high quality I know it's not a high power, on the other hand looking at a close up picture of the stainless CZ is hard to resist, I guess I can always get a CZ but not sure about the FN HP so I'll be thinking hard this weekend