VeT|Us
June 30, 2006, 06:28 PM
So, this is the situation;
I got some money due, and I've recently scoped and zeroed my new 1894C with a Tasco 3-9x40 which I stole from my CZ452.
The scope has served me faithfully for 6 years, with no problems.
However, I'm considering buying a Bushnell Banner 1-4x32 scope instead, and I need your input, is it just a waste of money to change?
While I'm used to the 3-9x, the fact that the least magnification is 3x, makes it utter slow in close quarters. It handles great inside my house, but the thing that slows me down is target aquisition at short ranges. It's a short range carbine, not intended to be used for any more than 100 meters,
and wouldn't I be better of with a faster 1-4x scope than a full 3-9x scope?
Also, cant you aim with both eyes open with a scope on 1x?
I've gotten worried practising to clear my house, and beeing so utterly slow to aquire a target through the 3x scope.
So, swap scope for a 1-4x, or stay with 3-9x?
I got some money due, and I've recently scoped and zeroed my new 1894C with a Tasco 3-9x40 which I stole from my CZ452.
The scope has served me faithfully for 6 years, with no problems.
However, I'm considering buying a Bushnell Banner 1-4x32 scope instead, and I need your input, is it just a waste of money to change?
While I'm used to the 3-9x, the fact that the least magnification is 3x, makes it utter slow in close quarters. It handles great inside my house, but the thing that slows me down is target aquisition at short ranges. It's a short range carbine, not intended to be used for any more than 100 meters,
and wouldn't I be better of with a faster 1-4x scope than a full 3-9x scope?
Also, cant you aim with both eyes open with a scope on 1x?
I've gotten worried practising to clear my house, and beeing so utterly slow to aquire a target through the 3x scope.
So, swap scope for a 1-4x, or stay with 3-9x?