[clange]

No surprise here, the St Louis Post-Dispatch has a bunch of morons that voted against the idea.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/columnists.nsf/Front?openview&vote=0 Scroll down a bit.

FYI, this bill passed the house with 108 votes, and the senate with 23 votes. In order to over-ride a veto they need 109 in the house, and 23 in the senate. If we're ever going to get this with a democratic governor, this is the time. MO guys need to get a hold of your reps.

Full story: http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/News/371042E32C60149886256D1E001BB5AC?OpenDocument&Headline=House+OKs+permits+for+concealed+guns

[El Tejon]

Man, look at that doctor's ears!

[clange]

Ok, unless i'm missing something, 111 voted for it in the house..

http://www.house.state.mo.us/bills03/bills/hb349.htm

This would give it a veto-proof margin in both houses as long as no votes change..

[clange]

Here's a few people we can write to (in the STL area).

Republicans who voted no in the STL area:
Fares, Webster Groves http://www.house.state.mo.us/bills03/member/mem091.htm

Democrats absent (STL area, house):
Adams, Arnold; http://www.house.state.mo.us/bills03/member/mem101.htm
Green, St. Charles; http://www.house.state.mo.us/bills03/member/mem015.htm
Hubbard, St. Louis; http://www.house.state.mo.us/bills03/member/mem058.htm
Johnson, St. Louis; http://www.house.state.mo.us/bills03/member/mem061.htm

[Frohickey]

You can still vote the non-scientific STL poll.... here (http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/columnists.nsf/1f9661223b60d75186256c91005cf59c?OpenView)

Gov Bob Holden should not veto it if he doesn't want to be a one-termer.

[Desertdog]

Right now it looks pretty good. 91% says sign it, 8% says veto it.

[Standing Wolf]

I sincerely hope Missouri will do the right thing!