[megatronrules]

Which of these would you guys buy and why? I've handled both and the both feel great in my hands the 239 seems to sit lower in my hand them other sigs I've owned. The HK uspc howevere feels very much like my BHP as far as grip angle and control locations. The hk can be carried cocked and locked which is a plus because of my current use of single action guns.

As far as the da/sa thing goes I shoot my beretta 92 ok. The trigger pull transition isnt that big of deal as far as accuratcy goes. I don't feel it would make a huge differance in a defensive situation do you guys? Thanks for any help.

[longeyes]

Glock 26.:D

[Berg01]

If you shoot a Beretta 92 already, you have to decide for yourself which one fits your hand better; I have big hands, so, of the two, the HK USP 9c works better for me.

If you expand your selection to include the Sig P225 or the P228, I would recommend either over the HK. Personally, I'd take the P225, since I already have a P228, and it would be a good addition.

[caz223]

You can't pick a loser between those two.
It's all personal preference.

[10-Ring]

I added a USPc 9 to my collection because I like the var 1 w/ option of an external safety. Plus, I like the manual of arms & having a trigger I'm very familiar with.