Amnesty International & Oxfam Anti-RKBA


PDA






roo_ster
October 18, 2006, 10:46 AM
Though not the main point of the article, I found it interesting that AI sponsors anti-RKBA groups.

How has AI fallen from its former perch of respectability. Nowadays, it spends its time berating liberal democracies and trying to get them killed off. Nice work, AI.

http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2006_10_15-2006_10_21.shtml#1161121558
[David Kopel, October 17, 2006 at 5:45pm] 0 Trackbacks / Possibly More Trackbacks
Global Gun Prohibition Lobby: Ban Arms Sales to Israel

This summer, the United Nations review conference for the 2001 Programme of Action on Small Arms failed to reach an agreement for new global gun control rules. Although stymied on one front, the gun prohibition movement is moving forward elsewhere, pushing for a binding Arms Trade Treaty. The proposed treaty is currently being discussed at the United Nations by the First Committee (Disarmament and International Security) of the General Assembly.

The leading NGO lobbying for the Arms Trade Treaty is Control Arms, an organization created and directed by IANSA, Amnesty International, and Oxfam. Earlier this month, Control Arms released a major new report, Arms without Borders, which makes the case for the Arms Trade Treaty.

The report offers examples of arms transfers which, according to Control Arms, would be stopped by a global Arms Trade Treaty. Among the examples cited is the sale of Apache AH-64 helicopters to Israel (page 12). Control Arms notes an incident in which an Apache helicopter shot an automobile in Tyre, and that, according to Human Rights Watch, there was no evidence of Hezbollah activity in the vicinity. In response, Prof. Gerald Steinberg of Bar-Ilan University states that the HRW/Control Arms claims "contradict clear evidence of heavy Hizbullah presence and use of vehicles for transporting missiles and armed personnel."

Page 25 of the Control Arms report states:

Helicopters, combat aircraft and air-to-surface missiles supplied to Israel primarily by the USA, but often incorporating components supplied by other countries, have been used in the Occupied Territories resulting in hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries, in apparent violation of international humanitarian law. According to Amnesty International, many of the 190 Palestinians killed in 2005 were 'killed unlawfully', including as a result of deliberate and reckless shooting, or attacks in densely populated residential areas. At the same time, Palestinian armed groups have used rockets, explosive belts and other bombs to kill and injure hundreds of Israelis.

Page 4 of the report includes a half-sentence criticizing Hezbollah for firing rockets at civilian targets in Israel. The Control Arms paper does not mention any problem about the international flow of arms to Syria. Iran is criticized for its arms sales to Sudan, but not for its supplying of arms to Hezbollah and to terrorist organizations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Control Arms paper presents, at best, a moral equivalence between Israel, Hezbollah, and Palestinian terrorists--all three of whom would, under the Arms Trade Treaty, theoretically be prevented from acquiring arms.

In future discussions of the Arms Trade Treaty, everyone should acknowledge that the Treaty is intended, according to its leading NGO sponsor, to create an arms embargo against Israel. A person who wants arms sales to Israel to remain legal under international law would be foolish to support the Arms Trade Treaty.

The General Assembly's First Committee meeting also covered other issues. Several delegates urged the First Committee to "stop the arms race in space," which is tantamount to asking for a ban on America's Strategic Defense Initiative.

UPDATE: Several commentators make the point that Israel has a robust domestic military industry, and therefore could survive an arms import embargo. The Control Arms folks are one step ahead; their paper emphasizes that the Arms Trade Treaty must include control of components as well as finished products. Control Arms is also very clear on requiring that the trade in dual-use materials (e.g., titanium which could be used for civilian products, or for arms) be banned, unless there are strong safeguards that the material will not be used for human rights violations (such as, in the view of Control Arms, Israel's current tactics in its wars against Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, al Aqsa, etc.).

The Control Arms report notes that Israel, like India, South Korea, and South Africa, among others, is an emerging arms exporter. The report offers no evidence that Israel has exported arms to any human rights violator. However, the report suggests that Israel and EU should both exert greater controls of the ultimate sale of Israeli or EU arms which are co-produced in India.

If you enjoyed reading about "Amnesty International & Oxfam Anti-RKBA" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
BigFatKen
October 18, 2006, 11:48 AM
When I was a kid, The Sierra club was quite pro hunting. Many of these clubs have been simply hyjacked for the money they bring to the CEOs.

Zundfolge
October 18, 2006, 02:03 PM
Many of these clubs have been simply hyjacked for the money they bring to the CEOs.
Worse, many have been hijacked by leftists so they can use their resources to push for global totalitarian communism.

Creeping Incrementalism
October 18, 2006, 04:32 PM
When I was a kid, The Sierra club was quite pro hunting. Many of these clubs have been simply hyjacked for the money they bring to the CEOs.

According to their website they support hunting to help manage animal populations, but not in National Parks. This seems somewhat contradictory to me--if hunting is good for managing widelife in location A, why not location B, since National Parks are so huge they are basically just like any other "wild" area.

http://www.sierraclub.org/huntingfishing/
Sierra Club's Policy On Sport Hunting & Fishing:
Wildlife and Native Plant Management, Sport Hunting And Fishing - Wildlife and native plant management should emphasize maintenance and restoration of healthy, viable native plant and animal populations, their habitats, and ecological processes. Acceptable management approaches include both regulated periodic hunting and fishing when based on sufficient scientifically valid biological data and when consistent with all other management purposes and when necessary total protection of particular species or populations. Because national parks are set aside for the preservation of natural landscapes and wildlife, the Sierra Club is opposed to sport hunting in national parks.
Adopted by the Sierra Club Board of Directors, December 10-11, 1994.

Henry Bowman
October 18, 2006, 06:28 PM
How has AI fallen from its former perch of respectability. Respectability? Not by me. :rolleyes:

hillbilly
October 18, 2006, 06:36 PM
Yeah....since when has Amnesty International ever been respectable?

I haven't noticed.

hillbilly

Standing Wolf
October 18, 2006, 07:09 PM
How has AI fallen from its former perch of respectability. Nowadays, it spends its time berating liberal democracies and trying to get them killed off. Nice work, AI.

A socialist parasite is a socialist parasite is a socialist parasite.

carnaby
October 18, 2006, 07:39 PM
http://www.sierraclub.org/huntingfishing/

seems like they still are pro-hunting.

yy
October 18, 2006, 07:46 PM
Not respectable? please explain the apparent contradiction to my experience.

I signed AI-sponsored mails to "put pressure [of public opinion?] on oppressive regimes that hold political prisoners [of course AI seems to determine who is a political prisoner and when a crime is a propaganda of a regime]" when I was in high school.

I didn't see how a joe-schmo public's signature could affect a truly oppressive regime. I had no say in US foreign aid, certainly. But it sounded like a noble and wishful thinking to gather signatures of US citizens to affect prisoner policies in distant countries.

But not respectible?

I mean aside from becoming the mouthpiece of Bush-hating hysterics of late...

roo_ster
October 18, 2006, 09:44 PM
IMO, scheming to deprive individuals as well as liberal democracies of the means to defend themselves from less-savory types is not respectable. On the contrary, it is pretty vile.

If you enjoyed reading about "Amnesty International & Oxfam Anti-RKBA" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!