Raging Bull question


PDA






mike83
November 10, 2006, 10:51 PM
Is the Raging Bull 454 Casull a good gun to shoot. I have herd they twist your wrist bad when shooting.

If you enjoyed reading about "Raging Bull question" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Ben Shepherd
November 11, 2006, 10:52 AM
You have to have a good HARD grip on the gun itself. But don't lock your wrists, elbows, or shoulders. You have to ride the recoil. Just don't fight the recoil, and you'll be OK. If you haven't, I reccomend you shoot a 44 magnum first. The 454 is not the first magnum caliber you want to shoot.

Forge
November 11, 2006, 12:07 PM
The good thing about the Raging bull is that it has a hefty weight to it along with a ported barrel. That helps considerably with the recoil. They also have a cushy grip. Either way, the 454 casull has 70% more recoil than the 44 magnum. As with any magnum, you'll want a firm grip on the revolver in order to avoid eating it. :what:

P95Carry
November 11, 2006, 08:03 PM
Firm grip yes - but not enough to fight the recoil.

I let any gun like this rise freely on firing, but that still allows for a secure grip. I need little excuse to repost my fave pic of My .454 Bull - breathing fire!!! Funnily enough, the Win ammo used was a bit whimpy compared with good solid Hornady type loads.

As an example of recoil handling - peek at this video (http://www.thingameez.com/vid-download/bfr.wmv) - only just over 1Mb - it is actually of my BFR in 45-70 but note, the first shot, taken by my buddy is with good grip but also stiff arms - the shock goes up thru his arm into body.

My following three shots show how I even exaggerate (habit!) the way the gun can lift - so that no relatively harsh recoil comes up my arm.


http://www.acbsystems.com/boards/thr/shoot/jb_shoot/454_flash.jpg

crunker
November 11, 2006, 10:58 PM
Why doesn't Taurus have a Raging Bull with a foregrip?

Remmi
November 11, 2006, 11:18 PM
Why doesn't Taurus have a Raging Bull with a foregrip?

I imagine it'd make it a royal pain to find a holster for it.

Also, I don't imagine it's a good trend to set; putting 'crutches' on Big-Caliber cannons like that - the last thing we need is a bunch of 98lbs poindextres thinking they can handle the Bull because it's got a foregrip.

Koveras
November 11, 2006, 11:28 PM
I found the porting to be the least desirable feature for me. It may have helped with muzzle rise on my 454, but it sent a nasty shock wave back into my face. My 454 SRH has more rise, but less "blast". My 454 TC Encore has even less blast but a lot more rise.

I did not experience any exceptional twisting of the wrist on mine, at least not more than would be expected with a double action 454.

I do have another Raging Bull in 41 Magnum that is a pleasure to shoot. But the 41 is a much lower pressure cartridge. If Taurus made a non-ported version of the 454 RB, I would have one today.

zinj
November 11, 2006, 11:51 PM
Why doesn't Taurus have a Raging Bull with a foregrip?

Because that would make it an NFA piece.

kjeff50cal
November 12, 2006, 12:06 AM
Why doesn't Taurus have a Raging Bull with a foregrip?

Please refer to P95 Carry's picture and imagine the hot high velocity particles and gas escaping the cylinder/forcing cone gap decending on your forearm:eek: .

countryrebel
January 6, 2007, 06:35 PM
I had the 5 and a half inch 454 raging bull and I had to fight the recoil to hit where I wanted.It screwed the nerves up in my right hand so bad that I could not shake hands with anyone for 3 months.I really liked the gun but it was just not for me.I am going back to the good ol 44mag.

If you enjoyed reading about "Raging Bull question" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!