[bclark1]

Anyone have feedback on these yet? They've been mentioned here and there but there's nothing really definitive, except that people feel Leupolds are nicer - which is pretty much the answer given any optics question. My frame of reference is the Burris Fullfield II, which I'm very satisfied with. Anyone have any input?

[GunNut]

I'm more inclined to go with something by a actual scope manufacture.

Lately i've been using only Nikon scopes, but have had Leupolds in the past. For my next rifle I plan on using a Burris Fullfield w/ the ballistic-plex reticle.

I'll wait for someone with experience using the Cabelas scopes too.

Steve

[cheaptrick]

Log in to Optics Talk and do a search.
They are talked bout from time to time there.

http://www.opticstalk.com/default.asp

[steveno]

I have a 4.5 - 14 x 44 Alaskan Guide scope on my Ruger #1B in 22-250. I think it is a pretty good scope for the money although it is a little on the heavy side. if they would have made it as a 40 mm it would be just right. if I had another application for one I would certainly buy another one.