PDA

View Full Version : 45 acp recoil question help quick!!!


deerhunter17
December 19, 2006, 09:47 PM
i found a good deal on a taurus pt 145 with like a diamond plated case, holster, 50 shells, that has never been shot and is 10 months old all for 325!
i was wondering what the recoil on this gun i? i have shot my dad ruger super blackhawk 44 mag with 7.5" barrell and recoil is not that big of an issue in that gun, but this 45 has like a 3.5" barrell. i need to know by tommrow if i want this gun.

thanks for the quick help

Lone_Gunman
December 19, 2006, 09:51 PM
If 44 mag is not a problem out of the Blackhawk, 45 ACP won't be a problem out of pretty much anything.

SoCalShooter
December 19, 2006, 09:53 PM
I agree with ^ if you can handle a .44mag then you will be ok with a .45acp out of anything.

Jim Keenan
December 19, 2006, 09:53 PM
I agree with Lone Gunman. Any .45 auto is a pussycat compared with a full bore .44 Magnum.

Jim

Black Majik
December 19, 2006, 09:57 PM
The recoil of the .45 ACP cartridge is nothin'. Happy shootin'

deerhunter17
December 19, 2006, 10:01 PM
you guys are great! i think its a pretty good deal i called a local gun dealer and he said they were $389.

Cousin Mike
December 19, 2006, 10:08 PM
Let us know how you like it when you finally shoot it. :)

51Cards
December 20, 2006, 06:25 PM
.45 ACP recoil is vastly overrated. Personally, I find it "pleasanter" than .40 S&W. I can't imagine it would be annoying if .44 is OK for you.

david_the_greek
December 20, 2006, 10:02 PM
I also personally find .45 recoil kinda pleasant compared to .40 aswell. personally I find my .45 to be the most controllable of all my pistols. my experience is only with 1911's but I couldn't imagine it to be too different from the taurus

Roadwild17
December 20, 2006, 10:08 PM
I have a PT145, the recoil is not that bad at all.

sabre452
December 20, 2006, 11:17 PM
I found the PT145 to be pretty snappy. The lighter bullet weights seemed to be less snappy. I have a glock 26 and a colt defender that have similar weights and both have a good bit less felt recoil for me. I didn't find the PT145 to be unmanageable, but the recoil was noticeable. I certainly didn't relish the 200-300 round break in session I had with the gun. Mine never had a hiccup or any failure, so I think you will be pleased overall.

tinygnat219
December 20, 2006, 11:46 PM
Hello, I have the predecessor, the Millenium Pro 745C. If you have fired the .44 Magnum, this won't be a problem in 45 ACP at all.
Some things to note though:

230 Grain FMJ bullets will lose velocity due to the shorter barrel
+P Ammunition is not recommended, it'll drive that polymer pistol into the web of your hand and blind you from the muzzle flash, which is considerable.
185 Grain JHP Winchester Silvertips make up the loss of velocity and are pleasant to shoot
CDNN carries spare magazines for it, I recommend 2-3 more.



That's pretty much it. This is my primary carry pistol and I enjoy having it around.

TJ

carterbeauford
December 20, 2006, 11:52 PM
The PT145 is nice to shoot! You want something painful, get a Kel-Tec P11. Like getting your hand stapled.

Not something I'd compare with .44MAG since there aren't many 3.3" polymer .44MAGs out there. Firing a 9" Redhawk is much different, like a big shove. Firing a PT145 is like a cross between a shove and a snap, but the snap is not unpleasant at all because the velocities are not real high. Just really loud. Invest in good hearing protection.