[sig1911]

http://www.wilsoncombat.com/index_leather.htm
check out this url, I found the WC's holster with less price,even made of sharkhide. but I am not sure how WC's leather compared to MiltSparks's. I wonder if WC's holster is worthy trying? thanks.

[sig1911]

sorry,my thread is ****...nobody is interested in that.:mad:

[Jiml3]

I own a Wilson sharkskin holster and belt and have been very satisfied with both. The belt gets more use as I don't carry a 45. I've had both items for over 10years and they still look new. My understanding is that Wilson does not
manufacture the products itself, it subs them out. It would make sense to have accessory items made to their specs under their name by somebody else.

Milt Sparks holsters are more hand molded than the Wilson line and both are well made. You pay more for Milt Sparks, but you get a bit more. Depends what you want and what you are willing to spend. Both work well.

[GunNut]

They look pretty nice, i just wonder who actually makes them?

Steve