Air Rifles
TX_Shooter
January 15, 2007, 09:55 AM
I never got this, but why do people pay so much for an air rifle?
Looking on gunbroker.com , I just don't get anyone willing to pay over 200.00 plus dollars on one. I mean there are some nice ones, but dang.... 200.00? My pumpmaster760, which now cost like 30.00 can kill birds, ratts , mice ect at 30 yards plus. I mean .177 cal , common... lol
If you enjoyed reading about "Air Rifles" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
rangerruck
January 15, 2007, 10:32 AM
they have inner working , moving, and toleranced parts, that are high cost , high machined parts. Also these guys usually check their bbls as tough as Bushmaster checks theirs.
Pat McCoy
January 15, 2007, 01:34 PM
Repeatable accuaracy at 10 meters, with stock adjustmetns to allow you to somewhat fit the rifle to the shooter. Top quality 10M air rifles run $1500-$2200.
Kimber1911_06238
January 15, 2007, 01:37 PM
I have a beeman...paid around 350 for it. Used to hunt squirrels, raccoons, possums, etc. They are quiet and accurate and you often get to shoot multiple animals because they don't run away like when you shoot a .22 at them. Plus they are fun and will last a long time. The high priced ones are usually high powered and will take larger varmints....a pumpmaster isn't really capable of taking a big raccoon.
Steve N
January 15, 2007, 01:45 PM
I just bought an Avanti 887 .177 cal CO2 pellet rifle. Why?
1. Cheap to shoot. 250 pellets + CO2 = $5.00.
2. I can shoot it in my basement safely.
3. Precision. Accurate to subMOA at 10M.
4. I can shoot anytime I want.
5. Very low lead and heavy metal danger (mercury or other heavy metals in primers). No smoke.
6. Very low noise.
7. Can whack-a-mole (or chipmunk, squirrel, crow, etc) if I need to.
Yes, many other less costly models can do the same thing, but I can afford it, so why not? How many $400 guns do you own, when a $100 gun will do the same thing?
To each his own.
Davo
January 15, 2007, 01:52 PM
With a good air rifle you can practice at home all day for a few bucks, and kick butt at the next high power competition.
JohnKSa
January 15, 2007, 02:08 PM
Air guns tend to be more complicated than firearms. The power that propels the projectile in a firearm comes from the ammunition while the airgun itself provides the power to propel the projectile. On the good side, that means that the ammunition can be much less expensive.
A good quality airgun is a very nice piece of equipment. All the best triggers in my gunsafe are on airguns. They also tend to be better finished than my firearms for the same price.
SaMx
January 15, 2007, 02:45 PM
The x ring on a ten meter air rifle target is the size of the period at the end of this sentence. High quality air rifles are capable of sub MAO accuracy, and hunting airguns are capable of much higher velocities than your pumpmaster. Aside from that, lots of the more expensive airguns have very nice fit and finish, with nice stocks and high quality steel, with no plastic anywhere. They tend to be pricey for the same reason firearms are, quality.
Steve N
January 15, 2007, 04:12 PM
The ISSF 10M air rifle target has a solid white 10 ring that is .5mm (.0196") diameter. A little bigger than the period at the end of this sentence, but not too much. As a reference, 1/64 of an inch is .016".
Khornet
January 15, 2007, 06:09 PM
are top quality airguns, period. As someone said, "Only accurate rifles are interesting."
They are superb machines and a joy to shoot. I shoot a 10 meter pistol match every Thursday night. In that room (actually a barn) during a match there iis usually about $14,000 worth of air pistol, and we aren't rich guys.
Guess it depends on whether you want a superb gun. If you do, it's worth it.
lee n. field
January 15, 2007, 07:07 PM
I just don't get anyone willing to pay over 200.00 plus dollars on one
They can go for way more than that.
YodaVader
January 16, 2007, 12:31 AM
I also have a Crosman pump sitting in the corner too! Also have a Beeman R7 which outclasses the Crosman completely in aeas like fit/finish, quality of materials , workmanship and precision. Trigger is vastly superior to the Crosman and even better than the majority of my centerfire guns.
Yeah , it was over $200 - so what? It had provided me with many hours of shooting enjoyment - in fact I was shooting it last night at the indoor range.
I have fired it more times than all my centerfire rifles combined! It is capable of high degree of accuracy within it's range. It makes my Crosman feel almost toy-like in compairison.
Jenrick
January 16, 2007, 01:16 AM
Well since I have all of you here :)
What would be a good starter air rifle? Not more then $300-400 pls. Also going to be used indoors with a home made pellet trap. Basically just looking for something to help me with my offhand shooting.
-Jenrick
Steve N
January 16, 2007, 08:11 AM
I just bought my first "real" air rifle, a Daisy Avanti 887. It is a CO2 gun, .177 ca. Cost is $370 + shipping. Very accurate. Same barrel, action, etc. as their model 888. Only difference is the stock is thicker and heavier for an adult, whereas the 888 is more for youth shooters. Stock on the 888 is red/white/blue laminated wood, and 887 has a brown wood laminated stock.
Comes with a sling, butt spacers, sights, and one 2.5 oz CO2 cylinder. Costs $1.99 to fill at the local Dick's.
Supply of the 887 is very tight right now. Champions Choice (champchoice.com) was supposed to have just received a shipment, according to Daisy.
Look at champchoice.com, pilkguns.com, pyramydair.com for a large selection of air guns. Pyramydair has a huge selection, but doesn't have the 887 on their website yet. Also log onto targettalk.org. It is a forum for air and smallbore shooters, sponsored by pilkguns.com.
For a pellet trap, look at the one at archerairguns.com. It is plywood and if you have any moderate woodworking skills, you can make your own. I did.
Khornet
January 16, 2007, 08:48 AM
is what you want.
Sleeping Dog
January 16, 2007, 09:35 AM
The Daisy M853C doesn't look bad. For a "target" gun, maybe too low-powered for hunting. Any comparison to Beeman R7?
http://www.odcmp.com/Rifles/JrRifles.htm
The Deer Hunter
January 16, 2007, 09:43 AM
I went the break barrel route and got my shadow 1000 for around $120. Its extremely accurate and a very high grade steel. Those thousand dollar ones are probably the same as mine.
Its a quality gun and i can tell it will last me a very long time.
El Tejon
January 16, 2007, 09:47 AM
Tex, one of the nice things about firearms and airguns is that you get what you pay for. You CAN buy airguns at MegaLoMart for $40, but once you handle a airgun worth much more, you will understand.:D
Beeman R7 is an excellent recommendation. A FWB127, if you can find one, would be great too.
I have a C1 at Beeman being rebuilt right now (shot it out yet again). Can hardly wait until it's done!:)
Jenrick
January 16, 2007, 02:39 PM
Does anyone make an air rifle, capable of being recharged from an air compressor or SCUBA tank? I've got those handy, don't have a CO2 filling station handy.
-Jenrick
EricTheBarbarian
January 16, 2007, 02:50 PM
ive got one of those daisy powerline 880s from wally world for 40 bucks. You know i was a little disappointed with just about everything on it being plastic. I dont really like having a plastic receiver although the plastic furniture doesnt bother me. I got some crossman hollow point "hunting pellets" thinking I would be dropping squirrels like no other since theyre all over the place here. It is very marginal for squirrels and not very effective. You need a head shot. The majority of squirrels I hit do a back flip then take off running full speed and are gone. Ive killed some but it only takes down small squirrels consistently. That is at about 20 ft. i like the sights on it and when I shoot it in my apartment i can hit stuff dead on at about that range but its not very good for killing. Ive kind of given up on trying to hunt squirrels with it and it amazes me that I hear people say theyre killing squirrels at 50 yards with air rifles. Apparently theyve got a better air rifle than the $40 wal mart special or maybe the pointed pellets are better than the hollow points? But if im going to spend more than 40 dollars on a rifle its going to be one that goes bang.
roo_ster
January 16, 2007, 03:49 PM
I understand the lure of the high quality airgun (Beeman R1 owner, here). The problem is that most weigh a ton and have the nastiest, most tumor-laden buttstocks known to gun-dom.
Really, 8-9+ lbs for an airgun is ridiculous. I think that, perhaps, a large number of airgun enthusiasts suffer from firearm envy & want an airgun that weighs and feels like a big-bore rifle.
My preference would be a powerful airgun (.22 or .25 barely sub-sonic at the muzzle) with an underlever or sidelever cocking mechanism, a slim & protrusion-free buttstock (no bulbous monte-carlo mess), and a weight coser to that of a Winchester 94 than a Magnum Mauser.
SaMx
January 16, 2007, 05:02 PM
Does anyone make an air rifle, capable of being recharged from an air compressor or SCUBA tank? I've got those handy, don't have a CO2 filling station handy.
there are lots of PCP (pre charged pneumatic) guns. Check out www.pyramidair.com
here http://www.pyramidair.com/cgi-bin/show.pl?cmd_category=show&category_id=2
Steve N
January 16, 2007, 05:35 PM
For those who don't think a .177 or .22 cal air rifle hits hard enough, pyramidair.com has 9mm, .45 cal and .50 cal air rifles. And they make their own pellets for them.
I see exploding squirrels!
slzy
January 16, 2007, 08:37 PM
i have shot large rats with a crossman that looks like a python. it killed the rats good and dead.
Sleeping Dog
January 17, 2007, 08:18 AM
air rifle, capable of being recharged from an air compressor or SCUBA tank?
Daisy 888, scuba should work. Price from CMP seems reasonable. Is the air compressor for SCUBA? A normal garage air compressor probably won't produce enough pressure.
http://www.odcmp.com/Rifles/JrRifles.htm
JohnKSa
January 17, 2007, 07:23 PM
I understand the lure of the high quality airgun (Beeman R1 owner, here). The problem is that most weigh a ton and have the nastiest, most tumor-laden buttstocks known to gun-dom.
Really, 8-9+ lbs for an airgun is ridiculous. I think that, perhaps, a large number of airgun enthusiasts suffer from firearm envy & want an airgun that weighs and feels like a big-bore rifle.The reason that powerful airguns tend to be large is that the airgun must contain all the equipment to generate the power that launches the projectile while the power to launch a firearm projectile is provided by the ammunition.
You can go lighter and get good power if you go with a precharged pneumatic (PCP) but you still have to have a tank to contain the pressurized air.
For indoor practice, the R7 is a good choice, and at 6 lbs it's not too heavy.
TX_Shooter
January 20, 2007, 02:48 AM
Well I guess it really depends on what you use it for to pay that big $$$ for one.
To me, my old 760 which was manufacture date of may of 1989 finally came to an end today. As I was pumping it, you can hear it hissssss. So it was not holding air. My 760, which made many memories when I was 12 years old killed plenty of rodents, birds and I promise this 'a racoon'. A buddy @ the time had a over priced 120.00 Benjamin Sheridan (single shot, pump and pellet) never beat me out on kills over my 760. I guess to each of there own. As for center rifles, I can say you pay for what you get. For my purpose at the time, my air rifle made me into a great marksman that I am today. So to me, that is what counts. :D
To me, yes you need a good gun, good accurate one, but even the best one can be beat with just a good gun.
YodaVader
January 20, 2007, 12:16 PM
Well I guess it really depends on what you use it for to pay that big $$$ for one.
That is very correct. My R7 at the time was $239. It is a target shooting air rifle for me and it that use it performs very well considering my marginal level of rifle shooting skill. The R7 allows me to shoot to a much higher degree of precision than I can compared to my Crosman.
These are a few 10 shot targets and a 20 shot I have shot at the 50ft range with the R7 from a standing position. If I could find a $50 or $60 air rifle that would allow me to shoot similar targets I would buy it.
A good air rifle shooter could do much better - certainly I am not shooting anywhere near the potential of the R7. From a rest at the same distance it is not too difficult to get 5 shots into a single hole.
knzn
January 20, 2007, 12:18 PM
" TX_Shooter
To me, my old 760 which was manufacture date of may of 1989 finally came to an end today. As I was pumping it, you can hear it hissssss. "
Rebuild or have it rebuilt. A hisssss may just mean new seals are in order.
koja48
January 21, 2007, 10:06 AM
I own several, not real high-end, but accurate as all get out. 2 Beemans (R-7 & HW97 and a Baikal "Izzy" pneumatic pistol). Great for pest control, superb triggers, I can shoot every day on my own range (practice makes perfect), quality ammo is cheap, etc. The rifles are scoped & I'll NEVER part with the R-7. Although one holds a spring-piston air gun more loosely than a center fire, breathing, sight aquisition, & trigger mechanics are the same . . . great way to keep my long-range varmint-shooting habits well-groomed. Check out www.straightshooters.com . . . there's a wealth of information to be had there.
TX_Shooter
January 23, 2007, 12:10 PM
Rebuild or have it rebuilt. A hisssss may just mean new seals are in order.
KNZN,
I called couple of service places and they want to charge about 40-60 to repair the seal and I even got the new seal kit from Crossman. That is sad, b/c a new pumpmaster can be had at my local wal-mart for 35.00 :banghead:
Sungun09
January 23, 2007, 12:25 PM
mine was $1,000 w/o scope. :eek:
They are quiet and can be fired in your attic, but watch out for windows, ahem....
On another note, mine puts out almost 30FP in energy. If I need to hunt squirrels or birds in my neighborhood I can.
They are also not registered in my state....:neener:
JohnKSa
January 23, 2007, 11:13 PM
I called couple of service places and they want to charge about 40-60 to repair the seal and I even got the new seal kit from Crossman.Crosman may fix it for free if you sent it to them. I'd call them.
TX_Shooter
January 24, 2007, 09:27 AM
Crosman may fix it for free if you sent it to them. I'd call them.
Crossman was the ones that gave me the phone number to call the service guys to get my crossman repaired. lol :cuss:
iamkris
January 24, 2007, 09:45 AM
Some of you guys seem to have an odd association of what constitutes value in a gun.
Since when did caliber = price? If a gun is highly accurate and is of impeccable build quality, that constitutes a high $ arm. Its caliber and mode of propulsion are irrelevant.
roo_ster
January 24, 2007, 10:25 AM
iamkris:
Utility usually comes into the equation, somewhere. The utility provided by a high-dollar air rifle is orders of magnitude less than a centerfire (or even a rimfire) rifle of similar cost.
Also, even the most accurate of air rifles are not particularly accurate at moderate centerfire ranges (100yds or so). At 10m, the best air rifles are world-beaters. At 100m, they are purt near worthless (loss of accuracy, trajectory like a rainbow, what little power they had has disipated to nothing).
FWIW, I appreciate air rifles' virtues, but I don't kid myself about their utility or the "bang for buck" they provide relative to firearms.
Also, because I point out air rifles' limitations and such, does not mean I think a person foolish for buying a high dollar example of the type.
NORTEXED
January 24, 2007, 01:26 PM
I bought my 12 Y.O. a Daisy / Winchester PS 1000 for Christmas from Wally world for 99.95 w/ scope. It looked like an O.K. gun in the store, and after shooting it a lot at home, I am impressed. It's advertised as 1000 FPS, and if I had to guess, I'd say they were right. I know it sure doesn't drop much out to 50-60 yds, and at 75', will shoot through 3/4" plywood and keep going. The 3X9 scope is not bad at all either, and the gun shoots consistently minute of sparrow from the back deck to the electric pole behind the fence (110-115'), and the .177 shoot through on most birds. The big black Grackels we have problems with here,flop 1 or 2 times, but never walk or fly away.
iamkris
January 24, 2007, 02:27 PM
Utility usually comes into the equation, somewhere. The utility provided by a high-dollar air rifle is orders of magnitude less than a centerfire (or even a rimfire) rifle of similar cost.
Also, even the most accurate of air rifles are not particularly accurate at moderate centerfire ranges (100yds or so).
If you mean utility like
Being able to shoot almost anywhere, anytime, even in the comfort of your basement
Being able to perfect basic marksmanship skills and drastically improve your shooting at any range
Being able to shoot at a much lower cost and damage (e.g., noise and recoil) than a centerfire
Yup...I agree with you. Its about trigger time, not power, trajectory, etc.
Again, the fact that it isn't a 100M (or a 500M gun) is irrelevant. The 50 BMG crowd could say similar things that you did about the .308 crowd.
Anyone who doesn't think that shooting at short ranges improves long distance precision should take an Appleseed course...where a significant amount of time shooting major caliber rifles is done at...wait for it...25M.
** I am not an airgun geek...don't even own one myself. I just see lots of advantages to them that are unconnected to bullet weight and velocity.
JohnKSa
January 25, 2007, 02:13 AM
The utility provided by a high-dollar air rifle is orders of magnitude less than a centerfire (or even a rimfire) rifle of similar cost.I find that I shoot my airguns a good deal more than I do any of my firearms...somewhere along the line it hit me that I should be spending all that time with a really good quality piece of equipment rather than something I bought cheap at a department store.
They have a DIFFERENT utility than many firearms, but if utility is measured in pests eliminated, rounds downrange, trigger time, or entertainment value, I'd say that my airguns are way out in front. ;)
roo_ster
January 25, 2007, 01:21 PM
iamkris & JohnKSa:
You both do a good job listing air rifles' virtues. I agree with all those points.
I don't agree withthe following:
Its caliber and mode of propulsion are irrelevant.
Rimfires
Thing is, the virtues listed can all be had in a quaity rimfire rifle like the CZ513 (http://czusa.com/product_detail.php?id=46) for 1/4 the price or something like CZ453 Varmint (http://czusa.com/product_detail.php?id=68) for 1/2 the price of the hypothetical $1000 air rifle. And they are roughly half the weight of a bbl/under/side-lever cocking air rifle (of the ~1000fps with .177" pellet class). So kids, and smaller-statured adults don't need a gun-bearer to tote it for them and hold the fore end up.
If you wanna spend ~$1000 on a rimfire, Anschütz can float your boat with sporters and dedicated target rifles in that neighborhood (http://www.odcmp.com/Rifles/cal22commercial.htm). Here is a catalog of Anshuzt sporter rifles (http://www.shooterscatalogue.com/Color%20Catalogs/Anschutz_Sport_Rifles.pdf). The weightiest target/sporter weighs less than the ~1000fps air rifles.
With most non-semi rimfire rifles, one can shoot everything from CCI CB shorts/longs (which are quieter than my own Beeman R1) to match .22LR, to high velocity .22LR. The below points are covered:
# Being able to shoot almost anywhere, anytime, even in the comfort of your basement
# Being able to perfect basic marksmanship skills and drastically improve your shooting at any range
# Being able to shoot at a much lower cost and damage (e.g., noise and recoil) than a centerfire
They can do all that while not being marginal for the taking of small game up to jack rabbit/rock chuck/coyote size. At greater range than an air rifle could ever dream of.
The only thing they can not do is not be a firearm, as an air rifle is not a firearm. This is significant in some locales & circumstances. In those locales & circumstances, the air rifle has the edge in utility as the rimfire can't play.
Centerfires
Air rifles & centerfire rifles are two entirely different leagues. I don't see them being shot in too many basements and the cost/shot advantage is entirely with the air rifle.
OTOH, a centerfire one spends $1000 on an be used for shooting at longer ranges than any air rifle can. It can also harvest game most any air rifle can not (with the exception of the big bore air rifles, which have serious range limitations and lack .177 & .22 air rifle virtues, anyway).
But, if one is not limited to basement ranges and one can afford some ammo, the utility of the centerfire rifle is all over that of an air rifle. This is especially true when comparing high-dollar equivalent air vs centerfire rifles.
JohnKSa
January 25, 2007, 11:17 PM
Even though rimfires can be safely fired indoors, the danger of lead contamination from the lead compounds in the primer as well as vaporized bullet material make shooting in a dwelling inadvisable. It's not just a matter of being able to catch the bullet safely and keeping the sound to a manageable level, a firearm is going to contaminate an indoor shooting range with lead while a properly designed airgun indoor range will not cause any contamination at all.But, if one is not limited to basement ranges and one can afford some ammo, the utility of the centerfire rifle is all over that of an air rifle.Ok, if shooting long range and hunting big game are your only priorities, and if you don't value any shooting practice that doesn't involve the use of your centerfire long range/hunting rifle then this is right.
But if high-volume daily shooting practice is a high priority, there's almost nothing that matches the utility of an airgun. You could even argue that the utility of an airgun increases the utility of your firearms by providing an inexpensive and convenient way for you to improve your shooting skills.
BTW, I own some VERY nice air rifles. None of them cost $1,000. One of the nicest ones I own cost me around $500--and that's the cost after a good bit of customization including some professional work. Stock, it cost me about $250--about what a nice rimfire would run.
iamkris
January 26, 2007, 12:51 AM
the utility of the centerfire rifle is all over that of an air rifle
Again, I think you are confusing POWER with UTILITY
To me, shooting is a sport and I want to be as good at it as I can. Air rifles allow you to do that more often, in more places at less cost and without the distraction of recoil and blast.
Centerfires are much more useful at whacking stuff at long distance. But for getting better at shooting I think (as my time spent as an instructor has proven) that they can actually be a DETRIMENT not a help.
I really think we're starting to talk past each other...sometimes in a debate that happens.
JohnKSa
January 26, 2007, 01:02 AM
I really think we're starting to talk past each other...sometimes in a debate that happens.Maybe, I think it's more that we've got some fundamental differences in how we view shooting.
It's interesting to see how other people think. Besides, this kind of discussion helps me crystallize things that I may not have carefully thought out before. I see shooting as primarily a hobby--I don't deny nor do I eschew the practical benefits, but they're not the main reason I own and shoot guns. So utility, in my case not only encompasses the purely practical uses of guns (air or fire) but also the entertainment value. That's where I was going with my comment about rounds downrange, trigger time, etc.
I can't tell if jfruser is really saying that the practical aspects of shooting are the only thing he's in it for, or if he sees this as an exercise in defining the utility of a "projectile dispenser". I think it's an interesting interchange regardless. ;)
dixierifleman
January 26, 2007, 01:12 AM
i dont get it either. id rather have a real rifle.
roo_ster
January 26, 2007, 01:40 PM
utility
u·til·i·ty /yuˈtɪlɪti/ [yoo-til-i-tee] noun, plural -ties, adjective
–noun
1. the state or quality of being useful; usefulness: This chemical has no utility as an agricultural fertilizer.
2. something useful; a useful thing.
3. a public service, as a telephone or electric-light system, a streetcar or railroad line, or the like. Compare public utility (def. 1).
4. Often, utilities. a useful or advantageous factor or feature: the relative utilities of a religious or a secular education.
5. Economics. the capacity of a commodity or a service to satisfy some human want.
6. the principle and end of utilitarian ethics; well-being or happiness; that which is conducive to the happiness and well-being of the greatest number.
7. Computers. utility program.
8. utilities, stocks or bonds of public utilities.
9. a grade of beef immediately below commercial.
–adjective
10. (of domestic animals) raised or kept as a potentially profitable product rather than for show or as pets: utility breeds; utility livestock.
11. having or made for a number of useful or practical purposes rather than a single, specialized one: a utility knife.
12. designed chiefly for use or service rather than beauty, high quality, or the like: a utility vehicle; utility furniture.
I am using the term "utility" as defined in 1, 2, 11, 12. If forced to pick just one, I would say #11 is closest: having or made for a number of useful or practical purposes rather than a single, specialized one: a utility knife.
I see an air rifle as the opposite of utilitarian. It is specialized.
If I were to make an analogy using knives:
Centerfire Rifle~Pocket folding knife~Utilitarian
Air Rifle~Oyster knife~Specialized
What are all the possible things one can do with a rifle?
Hunt small game
Hunt larger game
Target shoot
Train oneself to shoot better
Defend oneself vs two & four legged predators
Use as an implement of war
Participate in competition
Whack someone over the head with its buttstock
Display it for others' admiration
Go plinking
Entertainment
Etc...(Add your own functions/activities)
An serious (dollar & quality) air rifle is good for some of 1, 4, 10, & 11 and can be said to cover 3 & 7 pretty well. The other stuff it can't even touch. And the weight of a serious air rifle is relatively greater. I think 1/3 greater is a conservative estimate.
That said, the air rifle has virtues particular to it that in some, particular circumstances, the air rifle is the ideal tool for the task at hand. (I bet an professional oyster shucker would rather have the specialized tool for his work...and would be SOL if he needed to skin some game.)
Also, one can gain much utility and save much money and weight by moving from an air to a rimfire rifle of equivalent quality/accuracy/etc.
I tried to demonstrate this with my previous post, but was less successful than I wish I was.
JohnKSa
January 26, 2007, 09:13 PM
I think that's a fair assessment...
The only thing I would point out is that as you go farther down in a definition, the meanings are the ones less frequently used and more likely to be unusual shades of meaning rather than the most common meaning. That's pertinent since your argument depends heavily on 11 & 12 which are the least common uses of the word "utility".
Even so, using your assessment, if you enjoy shooting and good quality equipment, can't often make it to a range but want to shoot often, an airgun would be about all the utility you could handle. ;)
Sure, it has different, perhaps fewer uses (or more accurately, a narrower range of uses) than more general purpose firearms but if the areas where it excels are the uses that you want, and you don't want to mess around with "department store specials", then it makes sense to spend what it takes to get quality.
I guess what I'm saying is that defining a "reasonable" price by the overall general utility (across the board/over the entire general public/considering every single possible use and weighting them all equally) doesn't work in the real world. In fact, it's often the case that the more specialized something is, the more expensive it is.
What it comes down to for me is that airguns have uses that are valuable to me. I shoot them more than I shoot my firearms due to the extreme convenience factor and very low ammunition cost. I enjoy using quality equipment so I buy quality equipment. The combination of those things means that quality airguns are very useful to me and more than justify the money I have spent on them.
YodaVader
January 27, 2007, 10:48 AM
i dont get it either. id rather have a real rifle.
I have owned/own "real" rifles in calibers like 22lr , .223 , .308 and .444. During the Winter months when I shoot indoors quite a bit the air rilfe is a far better choice than any of the above. Although the 22lr is not bad either for that purpose. The air rifle still produces far less noise and give up nothing in accuracy to the 22lr at that range. In the Spring after my first Winter of indoor air rifle shooting I found I was a much better shooter when I started shooting outdoors again with the "real" guns.
I sure as hec would not want to shoot a .223 or .308 at an indoor 50 ft range! And my indoor range is a handgun only range with the excepetion of rifles in 22 lr.
So in my particular use there is absolutely no advantage at all in using a "real" rifle. And don't get me started on air pistol shooting! With my Beeman P3 I got a few laughs when I showed up one night. The guys shooting the Walther and High Standard target pistols were not laughing when the "lowly" P3 shot a better target than their high dollar pistols!
mainmech48
January 27, 2007, 04:01 PM
There are several factors involved when you're comparing the relative cost, weight, power, etc. of air arms.
Operating principle is one. Spring-air arms tend to get heavier and cost more as their velocity, delivered projectile energy, and the precision of manufacturing necessary to keep delivering them over a 'reasonable' service life increase. The stresses involved are unique and can be amazingly concentrated and severe. Successful solutions to cope with them tend to get heavy and costly. Match weapons require extremely precise manufacturing tolerances and engineering specs to deliver the accuracy and uniformity of preformance to be competitive.
Pre-charged systems offer several advantages as far as relative power, repeating capability, and size go, but not without a large price. The working principle requires that very high pressures be contained and precisely controlled. The sophistication of the engineering and the precision of manufacturing necessary to do this is expensive.
I guess it all depends on where you decide the best compromises lie, and what you're willing to trade for what. Value is always a relative term, and only the individual can decide what a particular feature or performance spec is worth to him.
I get about as much fun out of my 'cheapie' air guns like the two Chinese "Compasseco" gun show specials I paid about $35/ea. for and the Baikal IZH-61 repeater I gave $85 for as I do from my $400+ scoped RWS M48. The things I ask of them are what's different, and that's what the extra money went for, in my case.
TX_Shooter
February 11, 2007, 12:13 PM
I mean I upGRADED. I got a B30 .22 cal. This SOB is powerfull.
Shot a squirrel that was eating at our garden. Head-shot. No-more head.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v326/hifi_homeboy/IMG_3517.jpg
pacodelahoya
February 11, 2007, 12:24 PM
If I was allowed to shoot my Mosin or my Biathalon out in my backyard, I would.
I'm not, therefore, I shoot the Gamo hunter.
It's as simple as that.
Some of you guys really really sound like gun snobs.:barf:
roo_ster
February 11, 2007, 01:37 PM
TX_Shooter:
Is that an NC Star scope?
Have you used those successfully in the past on an air rifle?
TX_Shooter
February 11, 2007, 02:29 PM
jfruser,
Yes its the ncStar which I took off my rimfire .22
I was going to use it on my B30, tbut the darn B-Square scope mount bolt stripped. So nope, did not get to use it. I plan to buy an AO scope and probably sell the NcStar here in a bit
logical
February 11, 2007, 04:06 PM
Utility usually comes into the equation, somewhere. The utility provided by a high-dollar air rifle is orders of magnitude less than a centerfire (or even a rimfire) rifle of similar cost.
Shooting a .22 LR out thr back door will alarm the neighbors and if you live the wrong place, get you arrested.
A pellet rifle is nearly silent while dispatching a squirrel with no one the wiser.
That is it's UTILITY.
tasco 74
February 11, 2007, 05:03 PM
yep it's fun to just step outside your backdoor and shoot in town.. with an air rifle you get away with it... i shoot my rws mod 34 all year long! in the summer it's scoped and shot in the backyard and in the winter it wears a beeman sport aperture sight and shot acroos my basement into a trap...
Smith357
February 11, 2007, 05:23 PM
Yes its the ncStar which I took off my rimfire .22
Unless that scope is air rifle rated your spring piston rifle will destroy it very quickly. It is imperative that springers have AR rated scopes due to the dual recoil. It's also nice to have an AO that is adjustable to 10 meters.
Luis Leon
February 11, 2007, 09:55 PM
I own a RWS34, Beeman HWK77 and Beeman R7, of the three my favorite is the R7. Its light and it is really very accurate within its intended range. I do a lot of firearms shooting and don't live very far from my club. But when I want to shoot in my own backyard or basement, the R7 shines. I can shoot hundreds of rounds on my property without disturbing anyone. The R7 is a keeper and I will never part with mine. I have the older, fuller stock model, where the stock extends pass the cocking linkage. It really is a classy air-rifle.
regards,
Luis Leon
TX_Shooter
February 11, 2007, 10:23 PM
I called my local Police dept and talked to the SGT there. He said it was ok to shoot and if walking the rifle in public, he asks to make sure I put it in a ridfle case so no one panics if I am seen. I mean I guess they don't want me to be like Michael Douglass in the movie "falling down" :)
But its legit here to shoot a pellet rifle in my own back yard and if people complain the cops or he stated will not do anything about it. He asks just to shoot responsible :cool:
=====
Luis,
My 1st choice was the RWS34, reakky was. At the 170.00 mark for one was great, but I wanted more power so I got the BAM. great rilfe, but as I said, very heavy. It weights 8lbs+.
I was told that my B30 was identical to the RWS 52.
tallpaul
February 12, 2007, 09:53 AM
I am glad that somewhere along the way I learned to appreciate finer tools. I can use a cheap knife and do for some uses but I can and do use 500.00 pockett knives that make alot of folk think its crazy to do so. I have friends who thought a 300.00 chris reeve sebenza was nutz until I gave him one and he started to use it. Same with my pellet guns. My father- bless him- introduced me to the quality european airguns about 30 year ago. I paid just over 200.00 back then for my first Wheiriech (SP) HW 50 airgun. I still use it today almost 30 years later. For the folk that insist a .22 rimfire is all that is needed The only thing I think I can add that I have not seen is that I feel alot safer shootin into the air/up in a tree with my pellet rifles than ANY rimfire I own... My airgun has served me for all the practice,home/garden defense I have ever needed. I won't give up willingly either my firearms or my airguns. My airguns are just another branch of the shootin sports I enjoy. For you to think it stupid to spend money on a high quality airgun- I am sure you likely spend money on somethin someone else feels is even more stupid- like beer etc :neener: ...
I personally feel you are cheating yourself if you don't own a high quality airgun and you are into shooting, at least if you can manage to shoot it at or in your home.
Here are a few of my airguns...My first is on the top a HW 50 - then a "classic match gun" RWS 75 -then a double of the hw50 and then a Feinwerkbau 124 d, the first spring piston air rifle to break the 800 fps barrier- it is a light- trim sporter type and a favorite of mine.
http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e44/pprudowe/DSCN0454.jpg
If you enjoyed reading about "Air Rifles" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.