[aryfrosty]

I have recently bought 2 Dan Wesson .44mags. One has a set of 4 barrels and a barrel nut wrench...the other has nothing. I seem to recall the barrel/ cylinder gaps as being .006" on a DW .357 I once owned. Is that spec right for the .44 mags also? Thanks; :what:

[boomer1911a1]

Yep! I think the range was .006-.008 inch, but the feeler guage they supplied me was .006. ANd I would think tighter was better up until you experience binding.

[aryfrosty]

Thanks Boomer; I agree with the less the better. I had a glimmer of recall about Dan Wesson advising on the M-14 and M-15 .357 that if you got under the bottom by much it would make the cylinder bind if you fired enough to really heat it up.

[unspellable]

Nominal gap for the 44 Mag is 0.006 inch. I set mine to 0.004 inch. I don't worry about the cylinder heating up, the nominal gap on the SuperMags is 0.003 inch. A 0.006 inch gap is need for absolute reliability in a carry piece on grounds you may get some bit of junk incaught in the gap. But you can sacrifice a bit of reliability in a field revolver. I don't think any body is really going to be shooting fast enough with the heavy calibers to worry about heating up the cylinder.

[45crittergitter]

It is (or was) 0.006" on all but the SuperMags, which are 0.002".

[aryfrosty]

Thanks for the reply, sir.