News story on SF chapter of Pink Pistols


PDA






QuarterBoreGunner
June 6, 2003, 01:43 PM
Good article from the Bay Guardian newspaper on the San Francisco chapter of the Pink Pistols. Reporter accompanied on last range meet, I missed it being out of town but still a good read.

Also more evidence as to what a moron our District Attorney Terence Hallinan is.

http://www.sfbg.com/37/36/news_pink.html

June 4, 2003
'Armed gays don't get bashed'
The Pink Pistols say the answer to increasing violence against queers is more gun ownership.

By David A. Kulczyk
WITH THE MUFFLED sound of gunfire in the background, four members of the San Francisco chapter of the Pink Pistols relaxed in a gun-training classroom at the Jackson Arms Shooting Range on a stormy late-April evening.

Fresh from firing their weapons during this monthly target-shooting practice, they chatted about dogs, gasoline prices, and the Bay Area Reporter before moving to the more relevant topics of guns, the rights of queers to defend themselves against violence, and the reporter who had come to learn about this unusual group.

"What's this story about?" one member, who wouldn't identify himself, asked. "Crazy queers carrying guns?"

Despite the jovial atmosphere, the assembled group was dead serious about the threat of hate crimes against queers in San Francisco, and about their right to arm themselves. All of them said they had no qualms about using a firearm to defend themselves against would-be attackers, either at home or on the streets.

"I've had death threats, property damage, harassment, [and I've] been followed," said the anonymous Pink Pistols member. "You have to wonder if more of us got CCW [carry concealed weapons] permits that hate crimes would go down."

The group's rhetoric and presence in San Francisco – perhaps the most LGBT-friendly and antigun city in the country, yet a city where violence against queers is on the rise – raises interesting issues and questions: Would fear that their targets might be packing stop violent homophobes? Should queers be shooting people in the streets, fearing they could be bashers? Do guns deter or promote violence?

Out and packing heat
The San Francisco chapter of the Pink Pistols has about 40 members and usually meets the last Monday of the month at the Jackson Arms Shooting Range in South San Francisco. It's a safe, casual, and friendly event with members trying out each other's weapons, giving tips about ammo and techniques.

Gene Dermody, who looks amazingly like actor Kevin Spacey, was antigun for most of his life, but national crime statistics changed his mind. "I'm not afraid of [a gun]," Dermody said. "I know how to use it in an emergency, and I actually kind of like it. It's a challenge to me to see if I can master something."

Dermody is especially critical of the ultraliberal, antigun attitude of San Francisco's gay community. "I feel repressed and picked on by the gay community because I don't subscribe to their values," Dermody said.

It is certainly true that pro-gun values are more common to straight conservatives than to San Francisco's largely liberal LGBT community. Sup. Tom Ammiano, the only major mayoral candidate who is gay, voices the more dominant antigun position but stops short of condemning the Pink Pistols' position.

"I'm not interested in a jihad [against] anyone that owns a gun," Ammiano told us. "But certainly my preference is that they are really not needed. I'm not convinced that having a gun is the total answer to that, but I do support self-determination, and if someone feels that they want a gun and need a gun and are willing to go through the steps to get one, safety and education, well I wouldn't throw my body in front of that."

The splash page on the Pink Pistols' Web site opens with a photo of someone wearing a black T-shirt with a pink triangle and holding a pistol in the standard two-hand grip. Their motto, "Armed Gays Don't Get Bashed," is written three times.

Founded in Boston in 1999, the Pink Pistols are a loose-knit organization of queer gun enthusiasts, with 37 chapters across the country. There are no fees or meetings other than informal gatherings at shooting ranges. They believe that in those states that allow qualified citizens to carry concealed weapons, gays, lesbians, and transgender people should become comfortable with guns, learn to use them safely, and carry them. The Web site encourages queers to set up Pink Pistols task forces, sponsor shooting courses and help queers get licensed to carry.

"It seems that there is more of an acceptance of self-defense and gay people taking up shooting sports," said Thomas Boyer, the leader of the group's San Francisco chapter. "In 1982 there was this one gay man in San Francisco who had a pro-gun float in the [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Pride] Parade, and on it [it said] 'Gays for Guns.' And he said that he was constantly booed. I think that we wouldn't get the same reaction [these days]. We'd probably get some boos, of course, but I think the gay community is more receptive to the concept of firearms for self-defense."

Boyer, who would not say whether he or other Pink Pistols members ever illegally carry a handgun on the street, grew up in the desert in Arizona, where he received his first gun when he was six years old. A San Franciscan for more than 20 years, Boyer said he has been the target of attempted gay bashings three times, but he always fought back, using muscle, mace, or whatever was handy. Now he feels it's time to change the way the city issues CCW permits.

"Most people believe that they can get a permit to carry, if they need one, and that just isn't true," Boyer explained.

Licensed to kill
San Francisco is the toughest city in California, if not America, in which to be granted a CCW permit. Currently there are only five permits issued to non-law enforcement personnel in the city.

"This is an antigun city, and I'm proud to say that our District Attorney's Office has the highest gun-prosecution rate of any county in the state," District Attorney Terence Hallinan said. "San Franciscans don't like guns; they know [guns] are trouble and anytime there is one around, someone is going to get hurt."

The fact is that very few deaths result from queer-bashing incidents. The basic legal definition of self-defense is, you must have a reasonable belief that you are in imminent danger of death or great bodily injury from an unlawful attack and your acts are necessary to prevent the injury. That means you can't shoot someone who punches you and is not physically overwhelming or a trained fighter. So queers who shot would-be bashers could end up facing murder charges.

Yet rather than advocating gunning people down, the Pink Pistols seem mostly to go for the deterrent effect in their efforts to deal with rising violence. There were 317 reported incidents of hate violence against the LGBT community in northern California in 2002, and 272 of those confrontations happened in San Francisco, according to San Francisco's Community United Against Violence. An LGBT person is more likely to be assaulted in the Castro than in any county in northern California except for Alameda County. To the Pink Pistols, that concentration of violence against queers calls for deterrence, something that guns might bring.

"I imagine these people with permits to carry probably are least likely to need a permit to carry, because they don't live in a high crime area," Boyer said. "Whenever they travel, it's either by car or cab. I'm sure that they have very little exposure to potential assault."

In California it's up to the discretion of the chief law enforcement agency in each county to grant a CCW permit. Evidently Marin County is lenient about CCW permits, as it issued one to actor and resident Sean Penn, who recently made the news when his car was stolen, along with two of his handguns, when he was in Berkeley. It is no secret that Penn has been convicted of assault and domestic violence, a history that would normally disqualify any applicant from permission to carry a concealed weapon.

"The irony is, in a shall-issue state [one in which the sheriff has no discretion about issuing permits to citizens without a criminal record], Sean Penn would probably not get a permit to carry," Boyer said. "If the laws would be applied fairly, he would not be allowed to even have a gun."

Yet Hallinan pointed out that people don't have a basic legal right to carry concealed weapons, and San Francisco officials have acted on sound evidence in choosing to deny CCW applications in all but the most extraordinary circumstances.

"I think that statistics show that more people are injured by guns that are issued pursuant to permits than are saved by them," Hallinan said, "so I'm very leery of issuing gun permits except under very exceptional circumstances, where you have an immediate threat that would justify it and the person that it is issued to has some experience and training."

What would constitute an immediate threat? That's up to the sheriff. Of the five San Franciscans who have CCW permits, only one, private investigator Jack Immendorf, is not a government employee.

"I hope that [the Pink Pistols] will expand the interest in shooting sports," Boyer said, "but maybe people will work on politicians to allow 'shall issue' permits to carry eventually. About 36 states have 'shall issue' permits, meaning that if you qualify, they have to give you a permit to carry, and for them not to give you a permit to carry, they have to have a specific legal reason not to give you a permit to carry."

Isolated position
San Francisco LGBT organizations seem to bear the Pink Pistols no ill will, and clearly there's support in the LGBT community for preventive self-defense.

"The dangers are definitely out there, and if anything, we try to have programs that are related to violence prevention and self-defense," said Kar Yin Tham, executive director of the Lavender Youth Recreation and Information Center. "To me, the issue of arms is not what we are concerned about."

"I think that is one method of self-protection, though I don't think that it is necessarily the only useful method," Tina D'Elia, director of the Hate Violence Survivor Program at Community United Against Violence, said about relaxing San Francisco's concealed-weapon policies. "There is no 100 percent safety for anybody in this world. Even if they don't have a license, people can carry weapons."

What would be the implications if more people were issued CCW permits in San Francisco? Would there be shoot-outs over parking spaces and taxis? Would queer bashing decrease but homicides by queers increase? Will there be a day when you'll have to check your gun at the bar, like in San Francisco of 150 years ago? Not likely, but the issue will remain as long as people feel threatened by violence in the streets.

One Pink Pistols member even went so far as to say, "If Matthew Shepherd had a gun in his sock, he'd still be alive today."

If you enjoyed reading about "News story on SF chapter of Pink Pistols" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Standing Wolf
June 6, 2003, 08:41 PM
What would be the implications if more people were issued CCW permits in San Francisco?

I think pigs will fly sooner, but it's a great idea.

I have more in common with homosexuals who keep and bear arms than I'll ever have with heterosexual anti-Second Amendment bigots.

Zundfolge
June 6, 2003, 08:58 PM
On a side note, whats with the repeated use of the word queer ... I thought that was the gay equivalent of "The N-word" :confused:


I find it very hypocritical of the gay community to assume that because you prefer to have sex with someone of your own gender that you should be forced into conforming to other political positions that have nothing to do with sexuality.

I thought the whole point of the "gay rights" movement was to fight forced conformity :scrutiny:

madkiwi
June 6, 2003, 09:31 PM
Zundfolge,

I believe it is the equivalent, so like the N word it is used only by other gays.

Life is so upside down, isn't it?

That Hallinan:

I think that statistics show that more people are injured by guns that are issued pursuant to permits than are saved by them," Hallinan said

I wish that he would stop "thinking" and look it up, where he would be surprised to find out he is WRONG!

madkiwi

winwun
June 7, 2003, 07:09 AM
I was sorta under the impression that it was not PC to use the word "queer".

Rather like some other words that have suffered the PC "Hit List".

Did the news article simply serve as a vehicle for the columnist to gorge on the "Q" word, or is it acceptable usage ?

On the subject, is it proper that we have to worry about someones inference above what we are trying to imply ?

Okiecruffler
June 7, 2003, 07:38 AM
"We're Here, We're Queer, We're Armed To The Teeth!"

Should brighten up the next gay pride parade. The whole gay thing, I don't understand it, but I don't have to. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

SoCalGeek
June 7, 2003, 01:02 PM
As for the 'queer' thing, it's basically used to mean "anyone who isn't straight" be they bi, trans, or somewhere in between. Anyways, most queer people i know don't mind if someone says it as long as they don't mean it in an offensive way.

CWL
June 7, 2003, 02:49 PM
Gays in SF have a lot of political power/voting clout.

One powerful political group is called "Queer Nation", a popular cable show is called "Queer as Folk", -I think that they're long past finding this word painfully offensive.

I support any group that will get 'shall issue' in SF and California.

Mannlicher
June 7, 2003, 06:41 PM
I'm not a big fan of homos, armed or otherwise.

roscoe
June 7, 2003, 06:54 PM
oh, brother
:rolleyes:

SoCalGeek
June 7, 2003, 07:46 PM
Mannlicher-
Nobody said you had to like us, just deal with the fact that we exist. Live and let live :)

jacketch
June 7, 2003, 07:53 PM
I'm happy to welcome everyone on our side!

John Harrison
June 7, 2003, 10:45 PM
I'm not a big fan of homos, armed or otherwise.

Wow, you actually used "homo". How old-school bigot of you. :barf:

Dorian
June 8, 2003, 03:27 AM
I'm not a big fan of homos, armed or otherwise.

Damn man. If you can't say something nice....

I can't believe... Well I can't believe a lot of stuff. I'll stop before I even start because if I continue, I'll just end up being a hypocrite.

c_yeager
June 8, 2003, 03:50 AM
I'm not a big fan of homos, armed or otherwise

This is so very relevant to this conversation. thanks for sharing :rolleyes:

Correct me if im wrong on this guys but, isnt the PROPER pronunciation of Mannlicher Man-Licker? ironic isnt it?

Tamara
June 8, 2003, 03:55 AM
Chill, folks.

Gray Peterson
June 8, 2003, 05:57 AM
I'm not a big fan of homos, armed or otherwise.

We're among you. Just remember that when you're in a crowd of 100, remember that probably 10 of them are either homosexual or bisexual, perhaps more.

If ya got nothing nice to say, don't say it at all. I do not criticize heterosexuals for the acts they do in their bedrooms, nor do I say stuff like "I don't like straight people", considering that in most cases, the parents of a gay person are in fact heterosexual.

westex
June 8, 2003, 01:31 PM
Lonnie
I think you are getting your "1 in 10" statistics from the same source that says "you are 26 times more likely to be be injured if you keep a firearm in the home than someone who doesn't".

Just because someone throws out some numbers and they stick doesn't mean they are anywhere near correct. If you tell one big enough and often enough some folks will begin to believe it.

larryw
June 8, 2003, 03:10 PM
Couple elections ago, I remember a gay black man was being interviewed on TV after throwing his hat into the ring as a conservative Republican candidate for the SF City Council. What a firestorm! He was called a traitor to the cause, uncle tom, and bunches of other vile things that only liberals can get away with nowadays. Fail to march lock-step with the left in every aspect of the current dictum and they'll try to make you pay; the hypocrisy is truly amazing.

The PPs are to be commended.

Oleg Volk
June 8, 2003, 09:54 PM
one in ten or one in fifty...should't basic human rights (including the abiluty to choose your consensual mate of legally competent age and mental ability) exist independently of the majority wishes?

westex
June 9, 2003, 12:00 AM
Sure Oleg. Morality is for those dumb, right wing religious hillbillies. Everybody just do your own thing. If it feels good just do it. Now that's what made this country what it is today.

Zundfolge
June 9, 2003, 12:20 AM
We're among you. Just remember that when you're in a crowd of 100, remember that probably 10 of them are either homosexual or bisexual, perhaps more.

Lonnie, the "10% are homosexual" statistic comes from a Masters & Johnson study done in the early 60s ... they boys over at Masters & Johnson screwed up with the math and accidentaly moved a decimal to the right one space too many. Despite their very public correction and explination of the error, the "gay rights" movement has still clung to the 10% figure (because the lie is more compelling then the truth).

I personaly don't care who you decide to have sex with (as long the other party agrees, and as long as I'm not forced to watch it :p ) However I still don't trust the gay rights movement any more then I trust Femminists, Envrionmentalists or Anti gun rights groups ... they are all components of the collectivist horde that is trying to destroy liberty, capitalism and America (and will lie, cheat and steal to do it).

Still, I welcome any "queers" out there who want to throw off the dogma of the gay rights movement and embrace individual responsibility (not just individual rights).

And despite what Hollywood and Madison Ave want us to believe, there's a hell of a lot more to life then sexuality. :)

Gray Peterson
June 9, 2003, 02:13 AM
However I still don't trust the gay rights movement any more then I trust Femminists, Envrionmentalists or Anti gun rights groups ... they are all components of the collectivist horde that is trying to destroy liberty, capitalism and America (and will lie, cheat and steal to do it).

Personally, I'm more of the libertarian bent than a liberal one. If it were up to me, there wouldn't be such a thing as civil marriage, since it's properly a religious matter and not a state one.

No one, however, is ever going to support the idea of getting the states and the feds out of the marriage business.

Lonnie, the "10% are homosexual" statistic comes from a Masters & Johnson study done in the early 60s ... they boys over at Masters & Johnson screwed up with the math and accidentaly moved a decimal to the right one space too many. Despite their very public correction and explination of the error, the "gay rights" movement has still clung to the 10% figure (because the lie is more compelling then the truth).

So you're saying that only 2.8 million people are homosexual or bisexual? I doubt that, considering more recent evidence.

I'd say more like 5%. Remember that this was in the EARLY 1960's. The anti-gay environment was pretty bad at that point, Stonewall had not occured, and the country was still recovering from Sen. McCarthy and Roy Cohn's antics (yes, I know Roy Cohn was a homosexual, which was why he was so good at what he did at sniffing them out). In an environment like the early 1960's, would anyone, even me, admit that I'm gay or bisexual? Hell no.

Gray Peterson
June 9, 2003, 02:17 AM
Still, I welcome any "queers" out there who want to throw off the dogma of the gay rights movement and embrace individual responsibility (not just individual rights).

Just wondering, what individual responsibilities are you talking about? Just need an FYI on what you mean.

swingset
June 9, 2003, 04:40 AM
I'm not a big fan of homos, armed or otherwise.

I find it curious that no one picked up on the irony of an anti-gay comment coming from someone called manlicher.

Come on guys, that was too good to let pass!

trooper
June 9, 2003, 05:24 AM
Sure Oleg. Morality is for those dumb, right wing religious hillbillies. Everybody just do your own thing. If it feels good just do it. Now that's what made this country what it is today.

Hmmm... does that mean morality and homosexuality are contradictory? Interesting... ;)

stevelyn
June 9, 2003, 06:45 AM
Uhmm.....folks? Nobody is asking you to change your orientation, lifestyle or whatever. I think it foolish to reject allies who are willing to stand with us on the right to keep and bear arms. Lifestyle, color, religion, species, and sexual orientation are irrelevant here.
Okay, species might be a little much, but hey you never know when a vistor from another planet might show up.

winwun
June 9, 2003, 07:00 AM
Swing, I wasn't going to touch that one with a 10 foot pole. (God, don't I wish ! !)

Abberations scare me. I am comfortable with the norm. I believe in Sagan's theory of natural selection. I just wish it were a little faster.

Zund, I think you're petty much on top of it, however the underlying denial of what is tacit is, I believe, the issue here.

Lets say you found what you sincerely believed to be a mint 1866 Winchester and upon examination found it to be marked "Miroku" and "Uberti" and a few other less-than-desireable indicators of its value being other than what was first supposed.

Let's say further, that it shot as straight, or straighter, than an original 66, its general workmanship was acceptable, (it fooled you to start with, right ?) and it would likely last as long as an "authentic" rendition of what you supposed (and hoped) it was to begin with.

Now for the biggie question: How many can answer this truthfully ?

Would you still value the piece or would you relegate it to its proper niche and be on the lookout for other such "impostors"?

ElToro
June 9, 2003, 10:37 AM
as hard core right wing as some of my friends think i am, they would be deeply surprised to know i voted for the gay marriage prop a few years back.. if you got a job (or some other means of income) and your paying your taxes, who cares what you do.. as long as its not costing me. and dont ask me to pay for it. i guess im more civil libertarian than anything else...

I think its great that we get more groups like this on "our" side.

bogie
June 9, 2003, 10:46 AM
The question: Does the person shoot, and support 2nd Amendment rights for all?

If Yes, they're my buddy.

If No, I'll try to persuade 'em.

Boats
June 9, 2003, 01:15 PM
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."

Besides, being a left hander, one who endured an attempt at forced "change" to being right handed in elementary school, I have some sympathy for gays, because I believe them when many say, "Why would one go out of his or her way to choose to be ostracized by family and society and be treated like a second or third rate citizen just for some sex?"

I believe the trait for homosexuality is as inherent as left-handedness, balding, juvenile diabetes, or any other non-normative thing that humans take in stride because they accept that it happens to people. Somehow, homosexuality has been cast as a "lifestyle choice" when in all likelihood, and the tighter logic, it is not.

Thank my lucky stars that left-handedness, the hand sinister is no longer considered a sign of being "touched" by demons or the Devil himself.:rolleyes:

SoCalGeek
June 9, 2003, 03:12 PM
to c_yeager and swingset-

Believe me, i picked up on the mannlicher thing but i didn't want to say anything. After all, wouldn't making an immature joke just anger him even more? :cool:

...



heh heh... mannlicher.

Mark Tyson
June 9, 2003, 04:11 PM
"If the rest of you could shoot like them, I wouldn't care if the whole damn department was queer."

Clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry, in Magnum force

Oracle
June 9, 2003, 04:45 PM
Sure Oleg. Morality is for those dumb, right wing religious hillbillies. Everybody just do your own thing. If it feels good just do it. Now that's what made this country what it is today.

Does everyones morality have to coincide with yours to be legitimate, Westex? Thankfully, most civilized people in this day and age don't believe that to be the case.

QuarterBoreGunner
June 9, 2003, 05:19 PM
Ah. Morality.

All I wanted to do was post a nice little article from one of our weekly newspapers about members of a group, thought to be traditionally aligned with the left and lumped in with the majority of the anti-gun crowed, picking up arms and learning how to defend themselves and enjoy the shooting sports.

Morality. Such an interesting word. My ‘morals’ may differ wildly from yours. So may my politics and personal beliefs. In fact I sincerely hope that they do.

Homogenization is for milk.

Mark Tyson
June 9, 2003, 05:29 PM
We need to align with groups like pink pistols. We have been losing ever since GCA 68 (or maybe NFA 34). Wake up! If we don't unite and add to our political base, it will only be a matter of time before the safety Nazis and their totalitarian allies come for our arms. This RKBA movement has to adapt to new political conditions if it is to survive intact. The best thing we could do is to reach out to gay/lesbian/whatever communities and bring them over to our side.

Gays have every right to defend themselves and every right to the means to defend themselves. Why antagonize consenting adults over what they do in bed? Who cares? What does it matter to you? You don't have to invite them over to dinner, just acknowledge their right to bear arms, the same right that all lawful citizens have.

Anyway, nice article.

Ewok
June 9, 2003, 06:28 PM
Lonnie, the "10% are homosexual" statistic comes from a Masters & Johnson study done in the early 60s ... they boys over at Masters & Johnson screwed up with the math and accidentaly moved a decimal to the right one space too many. Despite their very public correction and explination of the error, the "gay rights" movement has still clung to the 10% figure (because the lie is more compelling then the truth).The study was by the Kinsey Institute (http://www.indiana.edu/~kinsey/), in the mid 40s, and did not have a mathematical error.

Tamara
June 9, 2003, 07:29 PM
A discussion about Pro-2nd Amendment groups is a good thing.

The associated discussion about the morality or lack thereof of various stuff is way OT.

I would respectfully suggest a sudden veer topic-ward.

willyjixx
June 9, 2003, 09:40 PM
an unlikely ally in troubling times.
who better to understand this oppression of the 2nd amendment than those who live an alternate lifestyle?
never saw a gun owner beat to death. yet
never saw a gun owner dragged behind a truck. yet
never saw a gun owner prohibited from joining the military. yet
never saw a gun owner ..............................


you get the picture, course (biased opinion here skip if faint of heart______________)






i liked em in the closet instead of marchin down the street naked, or having laws passed that turn a simple bar fight into a hate crime, or when its thrown into your face an theres nuthin you can do about it cuz then im a heathen????

no problem with gays at all, i just dont see the point of runnin around town having marches an parades at tax payers expens and getting special days at disneland just for choosing a partner thats on the same side?

my dime

SoCalGeek
June 9, 2003, 10:30 PM
About the disneyland days- those aren't officially recognized by Disney, the parks have nothing to do with it. It's pretty much a few thousand gay people gathering on the same day. I doubt disney would ever officially recognize the day, it would be bad for business. As for the parade thing, i'll admit that those should not be payed for by taxpayers. Should they still have them? If they're privately funded and there's nothing inappropriate (marching down the street nekkid comes to mind) then of course they should.

Hand_Rifle_Guy
June 10, 2003, 04:37 PM
Sexual orientation has little or nothing to do with indvidual responsibility. Kaliforny and Hell-inann don't trust individuals to any degree. Classic liberal elitist/sheeple mentality.

http://flymeaway.net/images/sheeple.gif

The funsamental part about all this is that you can't rape a porcupine. Porcupines are NOT predators. In SF, it's guilty until proven innocent. Hallinann's fired, the snot. I fire a LOT of politicians. For some reason no-one respects my authority. Stupid state.

50 Freak
June 10, 2003, 09:06 PM
I bet $5 bucks that Manlicker is actually a closet job.

Geez, it doesn't matter what you do in life as long as it doesn't hurt others. Because in the end (no pun intended:evil: ) your the one that has to face the big guy upstairs. Not anyone else.

Tamara
June 10, 2003, 09:31 PM
In all fairness, this has strayed far enough from the original topic. :(

If you enjoyed reading about "News story on SF chapter of Pink Pistols" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!