1100 Tactical reliability: 18" vs. 22"?
marklbucla
March 3, 2007, 01:36 PM
Is there any difference in reliability between the 18 and 22" Remington 1100 Tacticals? I've read that shorter barrels can cause problems in the reliability in autos.
If you enjoyed reading about "1100 Tactical reliability: 18" vs. 22"?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
marklbucla
April 4, 2007, 07:09 PM
Anybody have experience with either?
Chris Rhines
April 4, 2007, 07:37 PM
Both. As far as I can tell, barrel length makes no difference in reliability. More important is a properly sized gas port, quality action springs, and regular replacement of the O-ring.
- Chris
Starter52
April 4, 2007, 07:55 PM
+1 to what Chris said. A gas-operated shotgun will work with any length barrel, as long as the gas ports are kept clean and the shooter knows enough not to fire from the hip.
Bri-Dog
April 4, 2007, 09:49 PM
FWIW: When I went to have a barrel for my 1100 shortened for HD use my gunsmith recommended not going shorter than 20". He acknowledged that 18'' might work, and if not the gas port could be sized to get the proper pressure balance.
For me, neither of the two possibilities sounded great:
My trial and error reliability testing-and having to repeatedly return the
1100 to the 'smith until the adjustment was right.
OR paying the 'smith for testing trials until he found what worked.
I opted to go with the failsafe 20" length and it's been working perfectly at this length for over a year.:D
If you enjoyed reading about "1100 Tactical reliability: 18" vs. 22"?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.