Court of Appeals Affirms that "M4" is Generic


PDA






Henry Bowman
May 21, 2007, 11:00 AM
For those of you who may care, on Friday (May 18) the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court (Maine) ruling in Colt Defense, LLC v. Bushmaster Firearms that the term "M4" is a generic designation for a type of carbine, not a protectable trademark that distinguishes one brand from another.

The district court had also ruled that the product configuration trade dress (look) of the M4 carbine was functional and, therefore, not protectable as an indicator of source (brand). This issue was not appealed.

If you enjoyed reading about "Court of Appeals Affirms that "M4" is Generic" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
30 cal slob
May 21, 2007, 11:15 AM
hmmm. wonder if HK's settlement with Colt is null and void.

hankdatank1362
May 21, 2007, 11:44 AM
I didn't know Colt decided to appeal the matter after the first time the Courts ruled in favor of Bushmaster.

Henry Bowman
May 21, 2007, 11:55 AM
hmmm. wonder if HK's settlement with Colt is null and void.I don't know the details of it. Some aspects may survive, but parts would be questionable. Colt has no trademark rights in "M4" to assert, but may have contractual rights to assert against H&K. Would have been smart for H&K to insist on an "unless and until a court issues a final order declaring that Colt has no rights..." I don't know if they did.

redsaber75
May 21, 2007, 12:57 PM
As I understand it, M4 is a government designation that is technically in the public domain.

Ala Dan
May 21, 2007, 01:39 PM
as I own a COLT M4~! ;):D

.cheese.
May 21, 2007, 02:07 PM
actually - that's bad news for you. Means that others can be called M4. If only yours could be called M4, it might even gain more resale value.

Henry Bowman
May 21, 2007, 02:15 PM
As I understand it, M4 is a government designation that is technically in the public domain.That is basically what the district court found and the court of appeals affirmed.

helpless
May 22, 2007, 07:35 AM
Interesting case.

romma
May 22, 2007, 09:17 AM
as I own a COLT M4 Maybe we can call one "Original M4" and everything else "Extra Crispy M4"... Or is that a Trademark violation?

psyopspec
May 22, 2007, 09:59 AM
Am I still okay calling my Bushy an M-4gery, or is there now no such thing?

Kharn
May 22, 2007, 01:51 PM
I think M4gery referred to neutered M4s, fake flash hider (or muzzle brake), no bayonet lug, fixed telestock, etc, during the '94 ban?

Kharn

TexasRifleman
May 22, 2007, 01:55 PM
Well, "real" M4s still have the happy switch and a 14.5" barrel, so the number of actual M4s out there in non-military hands is very small.

The rest are still just M4geries....

romma
May 22, 2007, 02:12 PM
I think M4gery referred to neutered M4s, fake flash hider (or muzzle brake), no bayonet lug, fixed telestock, etc, during the '94 ban?

I am in CT, and my Bushy has all those neutered features...

Oh well, at least bullets still come out of the front thingy! :barf:

What a silly law!

nwilliams
May 22, 2007, 04:47 PM
I have a Bushmaster M4A3, I just call it my AR:D

psyopspec
May 22, 2007, 08:00 PM
The rest are still just M4geries....

Thank goodness. I can only tolerate so much abrupt change at one time...

If you enjoyed reading about "Court of Appeals Affirms that "M4" is Generic" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!