regional difference in proficiencies


PDA






j1133s
July 19, 2007, 07:41 PM
I had a chance to shoot a few IPSC and IDPA matches (club level and sanctioned) in TX and CA. I noticed that, although people have the same classification, there's a proficiency difference between, say, the A/Expert shooters in TX and CA. I know for IPSC it is nationally averaged and for IDPA is time based, so there shouldn't be much regional difference, but I feel it after a few matches.

Do you feel this too?

If you enjoyed reading about "regional difference in proficiencies" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
jmorris
July 20, 2007, 10:55 AM
Not sure why USPSA would be regional different. In IDPA what is called a sandbagger can be found. They are the EX and MA shooters in MM and SS classes. If you combine this sort of thinking allong with a person who thinks its "better to be the the tail of a dragon, than the head of a jackass." (a SS that practiced only the classifier to become an EX/MA) you will see quite a gap come match day. This doesn't have anything to do with different regions except for the thinking of folks that live in them.

Navy joe
July 22, 2007, 01:49 AM
I think there is in USPSA just because some areas like CA and AZ have a lot of good shooters at every little po-dunk match. You might still be trying to make A or Master, but your level of competiveness is raised by being in a tough crowd. When I was shooting a lot, the VA/NC area had a fair share of good competition. I could go to a weekly match and encounter 1-5 GMs, 5 or so Ms and a host of really good shooters. Being around them helped me, a lot.

cnemikeman
July 31, 2007, 08:10 PM
What I want to know is who were better? TX or CA? :)

SIRVEYR666
August 2, 2007, 05:52 PM
According to the Postal Match, TX is better. The TX average is 89.12 with 81 shooters. The CA average is 105.44 with 17 shooters. It's not a very even comparison, but it kinda answered your question, right?:rolleyes:

j1133s
August 2, 2007, 06:59 PM
As to who is better...

The last few club and sanctioned IDPA/IPSC matches I shot in TX I came up 2nd to last or last. In CA, I'm able to get 1st, 2nd, and 5th from top in my class at club and sanctioned events. CA has a bit more competitors than TX.

So, it would appear TX shooters are better. However, I think I may have figured out the root cause: TX summer heat. My wife mentioned that she's seen a pattern where in TX my ranking is much better during Nov-Feb and takes a nose dive March-Oct. Here in CA, the temp is like 84 degrees (vs. TX's 100) and I'm doing much better.

If you enjoyed reading about "regional difference in proficiencies" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!