Why on an M-2 .50BMG...
CWL
July 3, 2003, 08:13 PM
Y'all,
Why is it that to operate the US M-2 .50BMG, one has to work the bolt handle twice before firing? I've observed that one has to pull back-release, and pull back-release again before operation? Is this manual ejection of the first round to properly set the linked belt?
(edited for clarity)
If you enjoyed reading about "Why on an M-2 .50BMG..." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Greg L
July 3, 2003, 08:19 PM
Cool sound effects.
Of course unlike a shotgun someone a mile away probably won't hear it.
What do you mean twice? Do they have to pull the handle back twice to load a round or once back and then forward (two actions) to get the round loaded?
Greg
Destructo6
July 3, 2003, 08:43 PM
IIRC, the first pull is to lock the bolt to the rear. The second is to advance the feed mechanism.
Here's a manual.
http://www.adtdl.army.mil/cgi-bin/atdl.dll/fm/23-65/ch3.htm#p2
SDC
July 3, 2003, 09:05 PM
The first time pulls the first round out of the link, and forces that round down into the "T-slot" that runs vertically along the face of the bolt, while the second time pulls a second round out and advances the round in the T-slot to the firing position.
seeker_two
July 3, 2003, 10:10 PM
Interesting fact. Thanks for the info...
Now, would someone tell me how an M-2 .50BMG could be considered a RIFLE (forum-wise, that is)?...:scrutiny:
Ian
July 3, 2003, 10:41 PM
Well, it ain't a pistol or shotgun...
Feanaro
July 4, 2003, 01:12 AM
It's a machinegun but there aren't any forum for that, silly. :neener:
Kaylee
July 4, 2003, 02:19 AM
What Feanaro said:
Plinking, precision shooting, self-defense, putting food on the table: rifles and machine guns fill every niche.
When THR was in the planning stages, where to put the full-auto stuff was tossed around a bit. The final consensus was to integrate it into the rifle and handgun forums.. partly as a traffic matter (fuall auto being a really low traffic area on TFL) and partly as a conscious effort to normalize it.. so many of us post-'86 kids having grown up with "machine guns are illegal" BS.
SO... as I recall, if it's full auto, pistol caliber, and doesn't have a shoulder stock (ie Glock 18 and the like), it goes in general handguns .. otherwise it goes here.
clear as mud? :)
-K
Destructo6
July 4, 2003, 03:31 AM
Yeah, but what about the semi M2 BMGs?
Seems that having no buttstock would make it AOW. Never really thought about that aspect, though.
seeker_two
July 4, 2003, 06:23 PM
Kaylee:
That makes sense....sorta...
(Though I can't get the image of Skunkabilly w/ a shoulder-stocked M2 charging up San Juan Hill out of my mind...:scrutiny: )
Frohickey
July 4, 2003, 06:38 PM
(Though I can't get the image of Skunkabilly w/ a shoulder-stocked M2 charging up San Juan Hill out of my mind... :scrutiny: )
Are you kidding? Skunky would need a wheel-barrow to charge up San Juan hill with a M2. Besides, that would be very un-Skunky like.
M2s don't have tact-light mount points, or carbon fiber grips. :D
If you enjoyed reading about "Why on an M-2 .50BMG..." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.