Lie Back And Enjoy It


PDA






WAGCEVP
July 6, 2003, 09:54 PM
Lie Back And Enjoy It


You Can't Change It, But It's A Fun Show. Have Passport Ready

July 7, 2003


I-Already-Feel-Safer Department: In the Washington Times I discover that some ditzbunny in the legislature of Annapolis, Maryland, wants to outlaw plastic guns. Yes. She's going to get rid of them rascals. It's because it will end crime.

Quoth the Times "Alderwoman Cynthia A. Carter, Democrat, [now that's a surprise] said the law would ban all toy guns except for clear, brightly colored plastic guns." Honest. She's doing this. "If someone commits a felony with one, they [sic] will not only be charged with the crime but also with using a toy gun," avowed she, semi-literately.

I thought, Oh, good, Cynthia. You're encouraging criminals to use real guns, so that they won't be hit with the plastic penalty also. Of course a chief reason for using plastic guns has been that, if caught, the criminal could say with reason that he wasn't threatening life. How very astute, Cynthia. In your credit I'll say that when it comes to thinking, you have one motingator set of hormones.

The good lady will also fine parents of children caught playing with plastic guns out of doors. "Anything that can be done to deglamorize guns is a plus," said Ellen O. Moyer, mayor of the city that is home to the Naval Academy.

Cynthia is a co-mother of the Political Redskins Effect, which is the aesthetic appreciation of really good catastrophe. I used to follow the Skins when they were having a good year. When they had a mediocre year, I slacked off. But when they had disastrous years, when the running backs went in the wrong direction and the quarterback threw only interceptions and every other play was a fumble--I followed them again. It was fun to see how bad they could be. I longed for more-humiliating mistakes, for impossible errors. Maybe it was sadistic, or traitorous, or maybe just a joy in parody.

I've come to feel the same way about American society. Slow decline is draining, but spectacular collapse invigorates. It's no longer anything to be upset about. It's entertainment. The season's lost anyway, no hope of the playoffs, so enjoy it. I fire up the computer every morning in hopes of finding some new and unexpected form of daft behavior, a new chuckle, some form of social self-parody that I never dreamed of.

My political philosophy these days is to favor the funniest candidate and the most absurd policy, just to watch what will happen. Don't delude yourself that this is an easy course. The principle of Greater Comedy does not make for easy choices.

If Hillary ran against George, for example, I'd be hard pressed to choose. On responsible terms, Hillary would easily be my choice. She would socialize the country, but George is Stalinizing it; she's lots brighter, less embarrassing, and doesn't want to be Arabia's mother. She doesn't want to put a camera in my bathroom.

But in terms of amusement, George wins. Hillary is just an old-line big-government Democrat, and boring. She would take the country in bad directions, but not interestingly bad ones. George and his buddies are turning the United States into the first state of total electronic control. It's a first-rate show. Face it: Watching the destruction of the world's greatest free government is much cooler that watching the snoring growth of federal departments.

Another recent headline: "Sayreville, New Jersey-AP -- You can't pretend your finger is a gun -- even if you're in kindergarten.

So says a federal appeals court in ruling that a New Jersey school district did not violate a kindergarten boy's free-speech rights by suspending him for threatening to shoot his friends during a game at recess."

Now that's what I like: Forty-weight solemn clownishness, the kind you could calk a roof with. A kid of maybe six points his finger, gets suspended, and it becomes an issue of freedom of speech to be decided by federal court. Only in America do courts concern themselves with the unfurling of a kindergartner's finger. (Personally, I think that kindergarteners ought to be fitted with sensors in case they point fingers when alone. Yes, digit monitors. All sorts of things can be done with fingers. I bet nobody else ever thought of that.)

It is well that Americans do not care what others think about them. As best I can tell, Mexicans find our behavior puzzling if not lunatic, and the French think it deliciously amusing. The Canadians follow the American lead and often are even nuttier. The Russians probably watch with a sense of looming nostalgia. They've been there, but without the humor.

Anyway, for those who prefer to enjoy the spectacle instead of opposing the inevitable, I suggest that the best course is to promote a coalition of male Republicans and female Democrats. These reliably display the most amusing traits of their sexes.

The Republican men, as for example BushCroft and Rumsfeld, bring to the table a peculiarly male arrogance and sense of godhead. Female arrogance tends to be social; male, military. Men have a slightly different approach to insecurity. I suspect that those occupying the great double-wide on Pennsylvania Avenue worry that maybe size does matter, and they need to do something quick. They easily persuade themselves, in the absence of any real system of values, that their duty is to sweep away the smoldering ashes of the Constitution to make room for more microphones.

The female Democrats should manage the social burlesque. Being viscerally obsessed with security, security, security in a world that seems to be mysteriously but disturbingly somehow wrong, they will pass Niceness Legislation. The analysis will be emotional rather than rational. They won't know this. When the ill-conceived proves unworkable, they will insist on tighter controls on little boys, more bans on second-hand smoke, more intrusiveness in a flailing attempt to impose Niceness.

What I figure is, there's probably an alien Space Base somewhere, maybe on Jupiter, full of people with hairy green tentacles coming out of their heads and several eyes. And they're shooting Degradation Rays at the Earth. First they did Russia, which was already pretty degraded and didn't have far to go. Now they've got the US. They're beaming the footage back to wherever they live as a reality show.

Nothing else really explains what is happening. It's three-ring national apoptosis, the long leap from the Golden Gate. Whom the gods would destroy, they first make outrageously funny. We're there, and it's a splendid show.

If you enjoyed reading about "Lie Back And Enjoy It" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Art Eatman
July 6, 2003, 10:48 PM
Ya know, that's a nice word, "ditzbunny". I like that.

As for extending the rigid digit, "It's not really a pistol, Officer. It's the Flying Fickle Finger of Fate award."

And I have a current passport.

:D, Art

Hypnogator
July 6, 2003, 10:52 PM
Great subject line, and it fits the article! :)

Reminds me of back in the dark ages when I investigated quite a number of rapes, and did some original research on rape trauma syndrome.

A number of well-meaning but ignorant agents were fond of advising, "When rape is inevitable, lie back and enjoy it." What they meant, of course, was that a woman shouldn't risk her life by futile resistance.

You should have seen the looks on their faces when I countered, "So what you're telling me is, when sodomy is inevitable, bend over and enjoy it." Some became quite incensed, but they all got the message. :D

rrader
July 7, 2003, 12:02 AM
The most intelligently written leftist drivel I have ever read.

Executive Summary: "Those Republicans are even worse than we are."

Cal4D4
July 7, 2003, 12:05 AM
WAGCEVP,
Pretty sad line of thought for Independence Day weekend. The truth in it gives it real teeth. Our forefathers self destructed to form a government unknown previously in history. The people we've elected are making it "child safe". :barf:

Standing Wolf
July 7, 2003, 12:09 AM
Now that's what I like: Forty-weight solemn clownishness, the kind you could calk a roof with. A kid of maybe six points his finger, gets suspended, and it becomes an issue of freedom of speech to be decided by federal court. Only in America do courts concern themselves with the unfurling of a kindergartner's finger.

The founding fathers would weep.

Art Eatman
July 7, 2003, 12:18 AM
Hey, WAG, you should have said it's the Fred On Everything weekly column. My email copy just came in, right after I read your post.

He's cool, but he oughta get proper credit--particularly at THR.

Art

Sisco
July 7, 2003, 12:24 AM
When I saw the title to this thread I thought it would be about the Milliom Mom's solution to handling rapists.

bjengs
July 7, 2003, 01:40 AM
rrader saidThe most intelligently written leftist drivel I have ever read.

That is a very ignorant comment. Fred is hardly a leftist. Frankly I'm getting sick of being tarred as a liberal on this board simply for seeing through the lie that is this war. There is a huge difference between true conservatives (myself and many others around who believe in limited government, limited in its ability to oppress both its own citizens and other countries') and neo-conservatives (pro-war reactionaries who use anti-liberalism as a rhetorical starting point).

/rant

rrader
July 7, 2003, 03:35 AM
bjengs:

That is a very ignorant comment. Fred is hardly a leftist. Frankly I'm getting sick of being tarred as a liberal on this board simply for seeing through the lie that is this war. There is a huge difference between true conservatives (myself and many others around who believe in limited government, limited in its ability to oppress both its own citizens and other countries') and neo-conservatives (pro-war reactionaries who use anti-liberalism as a rhetorical starting point).


From WAGCEVP's peice: "If Hillary ran against George, for example, I'd be hard pressed to choose. On responsible terms, Hillary would easily be my choice. She would socialize the country, but George is Stalinizing it;"

Sure looks like a bunch of leftist tripe to me.


From WAGCEVP's piece: "George and his buddies are turning the United States into the first state of total electronic control. It's a first-rate show. Face it: Watching the destruction of the world's greatest free government is much cooler that watching the snoring growth of federal departments."

Sure looks like a bunch of leftist tripe to me.

From WAGCEVP's piece: "I suspect that those occupying the great double-wide on Pennsylvania Avenue worry that maybe size does matter, and they need to do something quick. They easily persuade themselves, in the absence of any real system of values, that their duty is to sweep away the smoldering ashes of the Constitution to make room for more microphones."

Sure looks like a bunch of leftist tripe to me.

Call yourself whatever you want. Sarah Brady calls herself a Republican only interested in "reasonable" and "sensible" regulation of firearms. That's total B.S. as well.

If someone is going to post their views then they are fair game for comment.

If you are "sick" of the response they receive then it's your hard luck.

Neo-conservative, LMAO, I have been volunteering for conservative political candidates for over 35 years. Your use of that liberal concocted tag-line is interesting however. I have yet to hear anyone other than bitter, resentfull liberals use it.

TallPine
July 7, 2003, 08:50 AM
Sure looks like a bunch of leftist tripe to me.

:confused:

Do you mean the article or what the Bush adm is doing ....?

:neener:

faustulus
July 7, 2003, 09:15 AM
rrader

Riddle me this radar: how is using partial quotes and comments out of context any different from what the antis do?

From WAGCEVP's piece: "George and his buddies are turning the United States into the first state of total electronic control. It's a first-rate show. Face it: Watching the destruction of the world's greatest free government is much cooler that watching the snoring growth of federal departments."

Previous sentence: Hillary is just an old-line big-government Democrat, and boring. She would take the country in bad directions, but not interestingly bad ones.

Sounds like ringing endorsement of the left to me.

The female Democrats should manage the social burlesque. Being viscerally obsessed with security, security, security in a world that seems to be mysteriously but disturbingly somehow wrong, they will pass Niceness Legislation. The analysis will be emotional rather than rational. They won't know this. When the ill-conceived proves unworkable, they will insist on tighter controls on little boys, more bans on second-hand smoke, more intrusiveness in a flailing attempt to impose Niceness.

Sounds like the author can't wait for this to happen.

Sure looks like a bunch of leftist tripe to me.
Then Sir you were not reading.

Art Eatman
July 7, 2003, 09:41 AM
All you guys are wrong about the article. :) It is really worthwhile to go to the Fred On Everything website and browse through his columns. You'll learn a lot more about his style and get some context.

Fred spent too much time, too many nights, riding with the cops in D.C. and other places to have a kind view of U.S. life. He doesn't suffer fools at all, much less gladly...

His columns vary. Some are among the funniest I've read, anywhwere. Some are biting, as he views with sorrow what he sees as the decay of a once-great country. But all of them stem from a clear-eyed look at our world.

I'm just glad I found his email subscription deal. Starts the week off right.

And there ain't many folks so terminally stoopid they'd call me a Liberal!

:D, Art

Greg L
July 7, 2003, 09:52 AM
http://www.fredoneverything.net/

Fred's site.

pax
July 7, 2003, 11:08 AM
If there were only two choices, the column would have to be one or the other -- liberal or conservative -- and it would make sense to quibble over which one of those it is.

As it is, though, it sounds as if folks are arguing over whether it's a Ford or Chevy, when in fact it's a Honda.

pax

Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule-- and both commonly succeed, and are right. -- H.L. Mencken

bjengs
July 7, 2003, 01:01 PM
Neo-conservative, LMAO, I have been volunteering for conservative political candidates for over 35 years. Your use of that liberal concocted tag-line is interesting however. I have yet to hear anyone other than bitter, resentfull liberals use it.Well, I used it. Lew Rockwell (http://www.lewrockwell.com/rockwell/oldright.html) uses it.So do many educated people who wouldn't call themselves liberal. Are you confused or are you name-calling?

WAGCEVP
July 7, 2003, 08:06 PM
sorry Art I was kinda in a hurry :o

WAGCEVP
July 7, 2003, 08:08 PM
rrader, IT AINT MY PIECE!

Oracle
July 7, 2003, 08:19 PM
rrader, can you not understand satire when you see it?

rrader
July 8, 2003, 04:32 AM
Oracle:

rrader, can you not understand satire when you see it?

Yes I can. But there is nothing about the piece that qualifies as satire IMO. If so then who is being lampooned? The writers of obscure, over-the-top, Blog editorials?

rrader
July 8, 2003, 04:36 AM
WAGCEVP:

rrader, IT AINT MY PIECE

Good. But you should have made that clear. There is no attribution in your post other than your username.

rrader
July 8, 2003, 04:43 AM
Bjengs:

Well, I used it. Lew Rockwell uses it.So do many educated people who wouldn't call themselves liberal. Are you confused or are you name-calling?

So far as I can recall, the term "neo-conservative" is about two or three years old and was coined by leftists to describe / descredit / denigrate supporters of conservative political causes around the time of the last presidential election.

I am not trying to engage in name calling. I just have never heard anyone other than a committed liberal use the term in the media or elsewhere.

To me it smacks of name calling in and of itself, it attempts to descredit those with a conservative political outlook as opportunists, recent converts of convenience.

rrader
July 8, 2003, 04:44 AM
Art:

All you guys are wrong about the article. It is really worthwhile to go to the Fred On Everything website and browse through his columns. You'll learn a lot more about his style and get some context.

Thanks for the link.

Art Eatman
July 8, 2003, 10:11 AM
I fail to see how anybody could call the column "Liberal". For instance, "that their duty is to sweep away the smoldering ashes of the Constitution to make room for more microphones."

Haven't many of us here griped about the Patriot Act and the ensuing increased snoopiness? Griped about various non-constitutional laws, rules and regulations? This ain't Lib/Con; it's everybody!

"The female Democrats should manage the social burlesque. Being viscerally obsessed with security, security, security in a world that seems to be mysteriously but disturbingly somehow wrong, they will pass Niceness Legislation. The analysis will be emotional rather than rational."

Isn't this just a different phrasing for our gripes here at THR about Feinstein and the MMM crowd?

:D, Art

MJRW
July 8, 2003, 10:23 AM
Art,

I think you are forgetting that Bush has his blind supporters just like the Clintons of the world do. They can do no wrong and anyone who calls it wrong is wrong.

RustyHammer
July 8, 2003, 10:38 AM
NEED MORE TIN FOIL! oooo OOOOO oooooo

Art Eatman
July 8, 2003, 11:38 AM
Yeah, MJRW, you're right. My problem is that of age and perspective. I'd say Fred is mostly Satirical Libertarian in his views on government, and is stuck with what are called "Conservative values". Sorta like me, I guess...

Dubya grew up during the LBJ Great Society stuff, and he--like many other young folks--take it for granted that government should and can solve social problems.

Funny. When JFK was elected, he was considered a flaming liberal by many. Nowadays, he could run as a Republican on his same platform...And Reagan ran on essentially the same platform. Go figure.

I think Dubya is indeed a kind, honest and good man. That doesn't mean I have to agree with the various policies and proposed methodologies of his and his advisors. The various candidates for national office, these last 40 or so years, have turned me into a "Litmus Test" voter: Second Amendment.

After all, one's views of the 2nd tell so much about that person's views of ideas such as personal sovereignty, liberty, self-defense rights, etc.

:), Art

rrader
July 9, 2003, 08:47 AM
I think you are forgetting that Bush has his blind supporters just like the Clintons of the world do

That would most definitely not include me. Dubyah has been a major disappointment from day one IMO. I don't plan on voting for him again, even if that means sitting out the next election.

Dubya's first and hopefully only first term has included actions like; pandering to the group (blacks) who voted against him 95% by dumping on Trent Lott, a representative of the group who voted for him by 95% (southern white men); pandering to the white suburban soccar moms (who voted against him by 75%) by supporting continuation of the AWB; pandering to the Hispanics by refusing to take any serious measures to increase border security post 9/11; refusing to take aircraft security seriously and agree to arm pilots properly; etc...

No, it's too bad we don't have a candidate like former Sen. Bob Smith of N.H.

bjengs
July 11, 2003, 05:18 PM
rrader saidSo far as I can recall, the term "neo-conservative" is about two or three years old and was coined by leftists to describe / descredit / denigrate supporters of conservative political causes around the time of the last presidential election.
No less a persona than Republican Congressman Ron Paul points outThe godfather of modern-day neo-conservatism is considered to be Irving Kristol, father of Bill Kristol, who set the stage in 1983 with his publication Reflections of a Neoconservative._ In this book, Kristol also defends the traditional liberal position on welfare. You can find the entire awesome commentary by Congressman Paul at http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/neo-conned.htm .

rrader
July 11, 2003, 08:21 PM
If Pappy Kristol defended welfare back in '83 then he wasn't any kind of conservative, neo or otherwise. The key term here is "self-described."

If you enjoyed reading about "Lie Back And Enjoy It" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!