And here I thought the Bush Administration was supposed to be pro-2A


PDA






Tempest
July 9, 2003, 12:41 PM
08 July 2003
Illicit Trade in Small Arms, Light Weapons a Serious Threat
(State's Bloomfield terms them "Weapons of Local Destruction") (1430)

The "illicit trade in small arms and light weapons" is a serious
threat to security and stability in the Western Hemisphere as well as
other parts of the world, according to Assistant Secretary of State
for Political-Military Affairs Lincoln Bloomfield.

Presenting the U.S. report at the United Nations July 7 to the first
biennial meeting of states to implement the "Program of Action to
Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and
Light Weapons in All Its Aspects," Bloomfield said parts of Africa,
South Asia and the Middle East are also among areas whose security and
stability are threatened by the ready availability of these weapons in
quantity.

"This activity persists," Bloomfield said, "because of lax enforcement
of laws and regulations, or their absence altogether. It occurs
because of poor governance and an environment that tolerates illegal
commerce, often involving corruption among government officials." The
U.S. official described the arms as "Weapons of Local Destruction."

Bloomfield reported that since 2001, U.S.-supported programs in 10
countries have resulted in the accumulation and destruction of 400,000
excess or illegal small arms and light weapons, along with 44 million
rounds of ammunition. These weapons were mostly left over from the
Cold War, he said, when many communist regimes held large stockpiles
of such weapons.

"Destruction of these weapons, therefore, represents progress -- it
takes them out of circulation for good," he said.

Bloomfield reported on U.S. laws and regulations supporting the U.N.
Program of Action. He also noted that the United States has been
involved in raising the issue of small arms and light weapons in the
Organization of American States, in the Wassenaar Arrangement, and in
the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. He urged
governments threatened by small arms and light weapons to "report
candidly on the state of your efforts to implement the Program of
Action."

Following is the text of Bloomfield's prepared statement:

(begin text)

Implementation of the United Nations Program of Action for Small Arms
and Light Weapons

Lincoln P. Bloomfield, Jr.
Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs
United States Report to the First Biennial Meeting of States
New York, New York
July 7, 2003

Madam Chairperson, Excellencies, and distinguished colleagues, it is
my honor and privilege to present the United States report to the
First Biennial Meeting of States. All of the governments represented
in this hall, and many of you personally, were here two years ago, in
July of 2001, when the Program of Action was debated at length and
ultimately agreed. In the intervening two years, many governments have
exerted considerable efforts, and expended substantial resources, to
fulfill the promise of the Program of Action. On behalf of my
government, I salute your efforts and look forward to receiving your
reports.

The United States strongly supports the United Nations Program of
Action, and the meeting for which we are now gathered. We are
committed to supporting the very focused and constructive agenda that
our Chairperson, Ambassador Inoguchi, has so ably brought forward.

I well recall that our deliberations two years ago were accompanied by
many passionate and well-informed advocates just beyond these walls,
representing the non-governmental sector. Among them were private
citizens representing a wide spectrum of positions relating to the
lawful ownership of firearms. Regardless of one's personal views on
that issue, in the U.S. or any other country, the UN Conference had a
very specific mandate from the General Assembly, and lawful gun
ownership was not part of that mandate. The scope of the Conference --
and the Program of Action -- concern the illicit trade in small arms
and light weapons (SA/LW). That remains our focus today.

Madam Chairperson, as we review the many initiatives our governments
have pursued under the Program of Action, I submit that we all have
more than enough worthy work to do within the terms of that mandate.
For it is difficult to exaggerate the impact of illicit flows of small
arms and light weapons, in troubled places very distant from this
hall.

We often talk about the biggest threats to international peace and
security, such as terrorism and weapons of mass destruction -- and
appropriately so. Yet, it is readily apparent that the illicit trade
in small arms and light weapons poses a serious threat to stability
and security in this hemisphere as well as parts of Africa, South
Asia, the Middle East, and elsewhere.

The ready availability of lethal weapons of war in the wrong hands is
a serious impediment to conflict mediation, and a force protection
concern for our militaries, including peacekeepers.

We must all work even more energetically to curb the illicit trade in
small arms and light weapons. I sincerely hope one key outcome of our
endeavors this week will be a redoubled commitment to that task. And
you will find the United States ready to engage in very practical ways
to reduce the terrible costs being exacted by these illicit Weapons of
Local Destruction.

The United States maintains laws, policies, and programs that support
the Program of Action. At the national level, the U.S. has a robust
and transparent system of laws and regulations governing national
holdings, manufacture, and the international movement of SA/LW. All
firearms, by law, are marked at the time of manufacture and import.
Inventories of all national military holdings of SA/LW are subject to
strict security controls and registration by serial number to ensure
that they are not lost or stolen.

At the regional and global levels, since July 2001, the United States
has sponsored resolutions in the Organization of American States (OAS)
to destroy excess SA/LW and to develop model arms brokering
regulations for the Western Hemisphere. We have sought to include
SA/LW in the Wassenaar Arrangement arms reporting categories. We have
supported OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe)
efforts to develop "Best Practice" guides to assist states in
establishing effective controls over SA/LW, and made similar efforts
elsewhere.

U.S. assistance programs called for in the Program of Action are
extensive. Our law enforcement training programs include a focused
curriculum on illicit arms trafficking for the countries of Southern
Africa. Export control and border security programs in over 30
countries worldwide provide legal assistance, training, and equipment
to prevent the illicit traffic in dangerous goods, including SA/LW.

Perhaps our most significant contribution under the Program has been
in the area of destruction assistance programs. Since early 2001,
U.S.-supported programs in 10 countries have resulted in the
destruction of over 400,000 excess or illegal SA/LW and 44 million
rounds of ammunition. The vast majority of these weapons in the global
illicit trade are not newly-manufactured but rather are left over from
the Cold War, when large weapons stockpiles were common in many
countries within the Communist world.

Destruction of these weapons, therefore, represents progress -- it
takes them out of circulation for good, where they will never fall
into the hands of terrorists, criminals, or warlords, or kill innocent
civilians. For details I invite you to refer to our national report,
which has been submitted to the United Nations Department for
Disarmament Affairs and is available on its website.

Finally today, Madam Chairperson, permit me to offer a word of
encouragement to those countries in regions most negatively affected
by the illicit SA/LW trade. The U.S. appreciates the connection of
this issue to your vital security interests, and urges your
delegations to participate fully in the dialogue this week and report
candidly on the state of your efforts to implement the Program of
Action. Your progress is what will make our work meaningful.

Achieving that progress, in our view, will require addressing many
factors underlying the illicit trade in SA/LW worldwide. This activity
persists because of lax enforcement of laws and regulations, or their
absence altogether. It occurs because of poor governance and an
environment that tolerates illegal commerce, often involving
corruption among government officials.

These are symptoms of a wider pathology undermining stability in parts
of the developing world, and until we mount a sufficient collective
effort to address the contributing factors comprehensively, we are
likely to face challenges from the illicit SA/LW trade.

That is why the United States stands ready to be your partner in this
important endeavor. Madam Chairperson, we pledge our strong support to
your efforts this week. I thank all of you for your kind attention.

(end text)

(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)


http://usinfo.state.gov/cgi-bin/washfile/display.pl?p=/products/washfile/latest&f=03070803.plt&t=/products/washfile/newsitem.shtml

If you enjoyed reading about "And here I thought the Bush Administration was supposed to be pro-2A" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Master Blaster
July 9, 2003, 01:15 PM
I well recall that our deliberations two years ago were accompanied by
many passionate and well-informed advocates just beyond these walls,
representing the non-governmental sector. Among them were private
citizens representing a wide spectrum of positions relating to the
lawful ownership of firearms. Regardless of one's personal views on
that issue, in the U.S. or any other country, .the UN Conference had a
very specific mandate from the General Assembly, and lawful gun
ownership was not part of that mandate. The scope of the Conference --
and the Program of Action -- concern the illicit trade in small arms
and light weapons (SA/LW). That remains our focus today.

ojibweindian
July 9, 2003, 01:51 PM
You do realize that Bush is NOT really a conservative. His politics are more in tune with JFK.

Bartholomew Roberts
July 9, 2003, 04:03 PM
If you want to criticize Bush for not being pro-Second this is a pretty poor example. First of all, this is a pro-Second statement being made by the U.S. rep. Second, the original agenda proposed at this conference in 2001 was blatantly anti-gun and was shot down by the U.S. to the whining and cringing of lefties everywhere:

Firing Line Archived Post on Original UN Effort (http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=74244&highlight=UN+Small+Arms+Conference)

ojibweindian
July 9, 2003, 04:27 PM
The text of the speech delivered to the UN by Mr. Bloomfield doesn't read as firearms-friendly to me.

Bartholomew Roberts
July 9, 2003, 06:06 PM
Well if you think that is unfriendly, click on the TFL link and read about what it might have sounded like without Bush in office.

Standing Wolf
July 9, 2003, 08:27 PM
Bush isn't a conservative. He was far and away the lesser of two evils in 2000, and doubtless will be again in 2004, but that doesn't make him a conservative.

AZRickD
July 9, 2003, 10:19 PM
Essentially what this man is saying is that whether Dubya or Bubba is in office, the USA continues to support UN-style gun laws, designed to confiscate weapons from the people who are being subjugated by violent dicators which both the UN and the USA continue to prop up.

What they want are gun laws (registration and permits) just like those in place in Rwanda circa 1964. Thirty years later in the spring of 1994, Rwanda Tutsis found themselves unarmed and under attack by the government-backed Hutus.

800,000 dead in the span of 103 days. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,65889,00.html

If it saves just one life...

Rick

HBK
July 10, 2003, 04:54 AM
Screw the UN and what they want. They have no power over American citizens and hopefully never will.

longeyes
July 10, 2003, 11:50 AM
"Screw the UN and what they want. They have no power over American citizens
and hopefully never will."

Tell that to the internationalists on SCOTUS.

longeyes
July 10, 2003, 11:59 AM
Bush is about where mainstream Democrats of a generation or two ago
used to be. Maybe a pro-mil Democrat like Scoop Jackson?

I don't know what in Bush's policies could really be considered
"conservative." Even his tax cuts seem to me like just political
strategy, part of an attempt to please the maximum number of voters
in all segments of the political spectrum.

I keep waiting for the man to listen to his Inner Texan. So far
a whole lot of nada.

GWB is the man who had to make things right in his family after
his sister died. He's a pleaser. That could explain much.

AZRickD
July 10, 2003, 11:06 PM
The UN has no power over the US?

You might wish to read the words of Justice Bryer and Justice O'Conner in the last sodomy case. As well, these words are instructive...
--snip--
"Breyer had held that a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights that homosexuals had a fundamental right to privacy in their sexual behavior showed that the Supreme Court's earlier decision to the contrary was unfounded in the Western tradition.

"We see all the time, Justice O'Connor and I, and the others, how the world really – it's trite but it's true – is growing together," Breyer said. "Through commerce, through globalization, through the spread of democratic institutions, through immigration to America, it's becoming more and more one world of many different kinds of people. And how they're going to live together across the world will be the challenge, and whether our Constitution and how it fits into the governing documents of other nations, I think will be a challenge for the next generations
--snip--

If you enjoyed reading about "And here I thought the Bush Administration was supposed to be pro-2A" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!