Smith and Wesson model 53 jet with 22LR cylinder, how accurate?
ramptester
September 30, 2007, 02:40 PM
I posted this on the S&W forum today, but I thought I would ask you guys to help me out too. I came across a model 53 no dash at a show this weekend, with the box and all six inserts. It is probably about 98%. However, it does NOT have the original Rem Jet cylinder, but does have the original optional 22LR cylinder. Is this gun as accurate as the model 17 considering the longer cylinder, and is it worth getting since the jet cylinder is not there? Thanks for your responses.
If you enjoyed reading about "Smith and Wesson model 53 jet with 22LR cylinder, how accurate?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
rcmodel
September 30, 2007, 03:02 PM
That's a very hard question!
It could be as accurate, if the .22LR cylinder is original, and was factory fitted to the gun in question.
On the other-hand, if it was converted by a shade-tree mechanic after the Jet proved to be such a PITA, it may not index properly.
I would look for an assembly or serial number on the rear face of the cylinder, and see if it matches the number inside the crane cut in the frame. (Not even sure if the 53's were numbered this way though)
But if it is, and the numbers match, it should shoot O.K..
If it doesn't have a number, or doesn't match, I would use caution, unless the price is very attractive.
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j219/rcmodel/KTOG/1224.gif
rcmodel
ramptester
September 30, 2007, 03:08 PM
The price is a bit high, considering the gun is not complete. However, it does have the diamond full cut stocks and the 6 inserts. He wants $775 out the door price.
Okiecruffler
September 30, 2007, 04:58 PM
So you'd basically be paying $775 for a model 17 with a long cylinder? Of course you could sell off the inserts to offset the cost, their kinda pricey.
rcmodel
September 30, 2007, 05:04 PM
These here ones aren't getting much auction action.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=81708853
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=81441976
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j219/rcmodel/KTOG/1224.gif
rcmodel
Jim Watson
September 30, 2007, 05:13 PM
I doubt the magnum length cylinder will hurt accuracy much. I think the Jet is a .222" because for whatever reason S&W and Remington chose to use LR rifling instead of conventional .224" of other .22 centerfires.
Sure sounds like a lot of money for a gun with the main original cylinder lost, though. The inserts are useless but are selling high so you could reduce the investment.
I'd be terribly tempted to rechamber it .22 Hornet. The Harvey Kay-Chuk, a K-Hornet shortened to fit a LR cylinder, never reported the problems of the Jet.
rcmodel
September 30, 2007, 05:16 PM
Now, that's a good idea!
Why didn't I think of that!
http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j219/rcmodel/KTOG/1224.gif
rcmodel
If you enjoyed reading about "Smith and Wesson model 53 jet with 22LR cylinder, how accurate?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.