I handled a Mark 23.
Amish
July 12, 2003, 01:54 AM
I was expecting it to be heavy, but it was lighter than a SIG 220ST. When I checked the specs on it, I found out that it was one oz. lighter than the SIG. From all the talk, I was expecting something real heavy, but it wasn't. No more heavier than a standard Springfield 1911 Stainless Loaded. Sure it's a little big, but it isn't huge. If I can find a used Mark 23 for a good price I plan to buy one and might carry it around. I bought a USP45F and the thing is sweet. It's like having a SIG, Glock, and 1911 all in one.
If you enjoyed reading about "I handled a Mark 23." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Tamara
July 12, 2003, 02:21 AM
If I can find a used Mark 23 for a good price I plan to buy one and might carry it around.
I wonder how many cows it'd take to make a CCW rig for one? :confused:
;) :p
Boats
July 12, 2003, 02:32 AM
Maybe it too could have won the XM9 trials despite its "obsolete" combat chambering?:evil:
Tamara
July 12, 2003, 02:33 AM
Nope, the cost of the caissons would have pushed it over the budget target. ;)
10-Ring
July 12, 2003, 03:00 AM
Yeah, the SOCOM is a beast, but I wouldn't mind owning one either ;)
Ian11
July 12, 2003, 03:14 AM
"Its like having a SIG, Glock, and 1911 all in one"
Yeah, and its as big as a SIG, a Glock, and a 1911 all in one too. Sorry, couldn't resist.:o
I was lucky enough to try one out one day. Very accurate, pretty lightweight for its size, mild recoil (similar to my SIG P220ST) and fit my medium sized hands very well. Even if I had the money I probably wouldn't buy one. But anyone who is interested in the concept should not be disappointed.
Mike990
July 12, 2003, 10:31 AM
Its the best crew-served handgun out there.:D
Sean Smith
July 12, 2003, 10:35 AM
I've only fondled one in the gun shops. Big, yes, heavy, not so much. Classic HK, though... to wit, overly elaborate execution of an eccentric idea taken too far. :D
Marko Kloos
July 12, 2003, 10:41 AM
That thing should come with a sling attachment point, and a good tactical sling.
You could probably tote it OK in a vertical shoulder rig. Just look at the carry options for Desert Eagles, and go from there.
George Hill
July 12, 2003, 02:40 PM
Naw, you carry them in a scabbard across your back... like the Claymore in "Braveheart".
Al Thompson
July 12, 2003, 05:22 PM
That's what you get when a Glock and Desert Eagle get too "friendly". :what: :D
cool45auto
July 12, 2003, 08:01 PM
There's a gunshow tomorrow not too far from here and I hope to finally see and handle one of these awesome weapons. Maybe one day...
Bergeron
July 12, 2003, 10:08 PM
I have also had the opprotunity to handle one of these monster pistols...
Was in a gun shop in Baton Rouge, just looking at all the new toys that the shop had in, when I saw a MK 23 that they had, and was fortunate enough to be allowed to handle it. Two negatives, in my opinion. The thumb safety needed to be longer and wider, mayber further foward, and I just don't care for dot sights. It was very nice though, and if I had the disposable income to blow on one, I probably would. Chrome the slide, just to aggravate the tactical weenies. :p
That pistol makes a convincing case for the purchase of a suppressor.
cool45auto
July 13, 2003, 06:32 PM
Yeah, baby! At the gun show in Gwinnett today I got to fondle a Mk23! It's no where near as heavy as I expected. The asking price was $2795!:what:
I've seen them for less than half that in my area. One of these days.
harrydog
July 13, 2003, 07:16 PM
I always see used ones for sale locally. Seems many people are enamored with the mystique but after the newness wears off...
I think the USP Tactial is a better choice for most people. It can do everything the Mk23 can do at half the price. And it's not as ridiculously large.
If you enjoyed reading about "I handled a Mark 23." here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.