Ruger MK III vs Buckmark


PDA






dubious
October 25, 2007, 02:56 PM
Ok ok... which one should I be looking at? Please discuss your favorite variants.
The Ruger MK III is obviously inferior to earlier models because of excessive lawyer input, but that's what they are selling new... so lets leave the MK Is and IIs out of the discussion. I'm only interested in a new one.

I personally like the way the Buckmark feels in my hand better, but I'm not too excited about some of the plastic parts. I feel like maybe the Ruger is a better heirloom, but the Buckmark is more of a pleasure to shoot. But I haven't had much range time with the MK III.

If you enjoyed reading about "Ruger MK III vs Buckmark" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
boomer1911a1
October 25, 2007, 03:07 PM
De-lawyering the MK.III is a fairly simple and worth-while affair, and pretty much completely negates any advantage the earlier models had over the Mk. III. I have a great love of the Ruger.
I am very leery of plastic parts, which is why I'm wary of getting, say, a S&W 22S or (now) a Browning Buckmark. But the feeling the gun evokes for you is much more important, I think. Get whichever moves you.

CWL
October 25, 2007, 03:33 PM
I personally like the way the Buckmark feels in my hand better, but I'm not too excited about some of the plastic parts. I feel like maybe the Ruger is a better heirloom, but the Buckmark is more of a pleasure to shoot.

Get whatever is best for you to shoot, in your case it is the Buckmark.

As for 'heirloom', whatever gun you truly enjoyed shooting will have the most sentimental value to loved ones.

jakeswensonmt
October 25, 2007, 04:09 PM
They're both good pistols.

I have both a Ruger Mk III 22/45 which I like fine, and a Buckmark Standard URX which I like better. They're both tedious to field strip, both reliable and well-built, cost about the same, but the URX grip ergos are incredible, and the Buckmark is slightly more accurate (for me.)

If you're looking at a Buckmark and it's got plastic, it might be a Camper. I would spring for a Buckmark Standard URX or a Hunter. These are great guns made to last. Plus if you're anti-plastic, the Buckmark's frame is aluminum and the Ruger's is plastic...

De-lawyering the MK.III is a fairly simple
How do you de-lawyer the loaded chamber indicator?

Jimmy Newman
October 25, 2007, 04:20 PM
The Ruger 22/45 has a plastic frame, the standard Mk III models do not.

That said, I personally would rather have a Buckmark.

Kestrel
October 25, 2007, 04:36 PM
De-lawyering the MK.III is a fairly simple and worth-while affair, and pretty much completely negates any advantage the earlier models had over the Mk. III.

boomer,

How do you go about that? Do you know of any pictures on the Internet with the info? (I don't have a MKIII, so I've not even seen the internals.

Thanks

Bullseye57
October 25, 2007, 07:04 PM
Yes, there's a wealth of pictures and information on my Mark III web help pages here at http://www.guntalk-online.com/detailstrip.htm

You can see detailed pictures of the internals of the Mark III on that page.

R,
Bullseye


http://guntalk-online.com/images/guntalk_logo_sm.jpg (http://guntalk-online.com/forum/index.php)

varoadking
October 25, 2007, 07:18 PM
I've bought 5 NIB MKII's in the past 10 months. They are all over Gunbroker.com, GunsAmerica.com, and AuctionArms.com, and you can find them NIB at most every gun show as well.

You just missed out on this gem at a great price. I have two like it, in both blue and stainless:

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...?Item=83306528

sonicserve
October 26, 2007, 08:59 PM
I reccommend Mark III. It has many aftermarket parts available, for example, VQ sear and VQ target trigger.

If you enjoyed reading about "Ruger MK III vs Buckmark" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!