HK USP vs Sig 220-229


December 4, 2007, 06:56 PM
Could someone please compare size of grip of thes guns?

If you enjoyed reading about "HK USP vs Sig 220-229" here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!
December 4, 2007, 06:58 PM
To me, the USP feels clunky. The P220, on the other hand, feels like a glove.


December 4, 2007, 07:03 PM
Full size USP feels much bulkier in the hand to me then a P220, of course we are talking double vs. single stack.

Same goes for a USP compact vs. a P229.

Give me the SIGs any day over the HK.


December 4, 2007, 07:30 PM
I have the USP45F SS, USP45C, USP40C, USP357SIGC, & the SIG P220. All are excellent pistols. They all fit my hand and all have been 100% reliable so far! I would be hard put to choose a best out of these. :)


December 4, 2007, 07:34 PM
Before I purchased my USP I also looked at the SIG. I have pretty large hands so the grip size of the USP was actually a positive for me.

I don't regret the decision at all. The USP is one of the most rocks solid and reliable pistols you can own. I would chose the HK over the SIG 100 times out of 100.

Ala Dan
December 4, 2007, 07:37 PM
SIG P220, hands down~! ;)

December 4, 2007, 07:42 PM

Having both, P220 with 825 rounds down-range without any failures, just 100%, along with a Sig P229 9mm with 2700 rounds without any failures, just 100%, I'd say without a doubt, go with either Sig..

Also: one of, if not, the easiest guns to disassemble, inspect, clean, and reassemble out there, bar none.. KEY IMHO.


December 4, 2007, 07:48 PM
if you have big hands the usp is for you.

December 5, 2007, 12:54 AM
And if you have big hands, the 220 isn't for you. Trigger LOP is short.

Both are great guns. Fondle them them and decide for yourself.

December 16, 2007, 02:33 AM
I find the P220 far more comfortable than the USP.


December 16, 2007, 04:12 PM
I like the integrated decocker/safety on my USPc, and will soon get a full size USP9. The decocker on the p220 seems to get in the way.

The P220 grip is too narrow for my gorilla hands.

December 16, 2007, 04:29 PM
Check out the HK P2000 if you dislike the USPc due to its ergonomics.

30-06 lover
December 16, 2007, 08:33 PM
I have big hands, so the USP is a better fit for LOP and such, but it is still shaped like a 2x4 and not all that comfortable. I am now thinking CZ.

December 16, 2007, 11:30 PM
I owned a 220 for several years and 1,000s of rounds. Great Gun! But after I purchased my USP Tactical 45, the 220 migrated to the back of the safe. For me, the feel was a little better, the match trigger a lot better and ergonomics of the controls on the Tactical suited me better. I still have my 226, which I've had four about 17 years now and over 20,000 rounds.

December 17, 2007, 09:35 AM
I have all pistols listed(HK USP45T, Sig P229 40/357, Sig P220 38Super). I love them all. I think I'm more attached to my P229(easier to carry, with good round count). All are extremely great shooters!

December 18, 2007, 02:50 PM
I've shot both, I prefer the USP over the P220. I have large hands and the P220 just felt very awkward in my hands. The USP feels lighter as well.

If you enjoyed reading about "HK USP vs Sig 220-229" here in archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join today for the full version!