Should I or Shouldn't I: Glock collecting!


PDA






CountGlockula
December 5, 2007, 03:05 PM
Hello THR Family. When you've found the brand that you'll bet your life on, your pretty much committed to it: Hk lovers, XD lovers, Springer lovers, etc. results.

So here's my dilemma: I own a GLOCK 35 and 23, both in .40S&W. I love the round so much...so should I complete my collection with the G22, G27 and G24?

OR

Should I just have variety and get a classic GLOCK 17 or 21 in .45ACP? I'm very option to have 9mm, 10mm, .45ACP or .45GAP in my ammo pile.

What would THR members do in CountGlockula's pointy shoes? Thanks.

If you enjoyed reading about "Should I or Shouldn't I: Glock collecting!" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
mavracer
December 5, 2007, 03:17 PM
nothing wrong with Glocks, but I don't like them myself so go ahead and buy all you want won't hurt my feelings.

BamBam-31
December 5, 2007, 03:21 PM
No Glock collection is complete without the G17. ;)

19-3Ben
December 5, 2007, 03:22 PM
Can't hurt to have everything using same standard ammo and standard mags.
I'd stick with .40. Only one caliber to stockpile, and if TSHTF the standardization might be more practical than a variety of rounds.

redneckrepairs
December 5, 2007, 03:23 PM
Well i hear some folks collect empty beer cans and bottles .. a glock collection makes more sense to me than that lol .

RTFM
December 5, 2007, 03:24 PM
I'd be all for mixing uit up in the GLOCK family.

19-3Ben... not picking on you, but it struck me reading your reply. That for years and years and years upon years everyone talks about IF the SHTF ........ it just seams so over concerning.......

if IF if If iF ........... It never bothered me much.

rcmodel
December 5, 2007, 03:26 PM
"Collection" is kind of a misleading word.

I "Collect" old Winchesters, Colts, and S&W's because of the interesting variety, and because they continue to appreciate in value, and will never get any cheaper then they already are.

I doubt any Glock made will ever be worth as much as the day you bought it new.

And they are all boringly the same thing, regardless of the model number.
Seen one, seen'm all!

http://i81.photobucket.com/albums/j219/rcmodel/KTOG/1224.gif
rcmodel

glockman19
December 5, 2007, 03:37 PM
so should I complete my collection with the G22, G27 and G24?
YES

Then you should collect Golck's in other calibers. I have the 17/19/26/23.

10-Ring
December 5, 2007, 03:46 PM
Every collection needs at least one Glock 19 ;)

strat81
December 5, 2007, 03:50 PM
I'd finish it by size, then branch out to other calibers.

Geno
December 5, 2007, 04:08 PM
If you have the money after the bills are paid, and the kids' (if any) college expenses funded, have to at whatever makes you happy.

I must admit, that I am the wrong one to ask if you should purchase a pistol, if the answer that you want is one of temperance. :)

Doc2005

Silvanus
December 5, 2007, 04:14 PM
I'm planning on doing the same as soon as I have all the guns I need. I have a G17 and want to buy the 19 and 26 also. I don't like the longer competition versions though. But an 18 would be cool to have too. They don't cost much more than the 17 here.

CountGlockula
December 5, 2007, 04:14 PM
Thanks folks. My hidden agenda on picking up some new GLOCKS...as GSSF member (Glock Sport Shooting Foundation), I get a discount that's lower than the LEO price! Nice Holiday gift for the Count.

If you guys don't know about it, it pretty exclusive...here's their site:
http://www.gssfonline.com/.

Majic
December 5, 2007, 04:23 PM
Just because you found what you like to carry or use for defense doesn't mean you are commit to anything. There is no reason not to collect any gun on the market.

Sistema1927
December 5, 2007, 04:41 PM
"Glock Collector"

Isn't that an oxymoron?

Nothing against Glocks, but I don't see them as "collectable".

BridgeWalker
December 5, 2007, 04:48 PM
Oh come on. People collect rocks, they collect leaves. Something is "collectible" if one decides he wants to collect it. This is the second time time this week I've seen a thread wherein someone disparages the idea of "collecting" the things they want rather than things that will appreciate in value.

Not all collections are investments. Some of us collect stuff because we enjoy owning a variety of things within a particular type. If that's not a collection I don't know what is.

hmph.

Anyway, personally I think it would be more fun to branch out to other calibers. But then I'm more of a one-of-each type collector.

fineredmist
December 5, 2007, 04:49 PM
I have a 17, 19, 22 and 26 and I can tell you I find the 19 to be the best of the bunch. It was the last one that I bought and the one that I shoot the most, it is just the right size and it handles perfectly. You can't go wrong with the 19.

Tully M. Pick
December 5, 2007, 05:12 PM
"Glock Collector"

Isn't that an oxymoron?

Nothing against Glocks, but I don't see them as "collectable".

I think the proper terminology would be "Glock Hoarder."

Geno
December 5, 2007, 05:40 PM
Well, here we have the official definition:

Per: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/collect "collect:" means:

2. To accumulate as a hobby or for study.

Sounds right to me. Go forth, and collect your Glocks.

Doc2005

Josh Aston
December 5, 2007, 05:44 PM
Well if you're gonna collect Glocks might as well get one of every model and generation that that model was available in. Should add up to quite a few Glocks.

Baneblade
December 5, 2007, 06:50 PM
To answer the question, go with the Glock 17. I am in the same situation. My Glock collection has grown, but I lack the original. I would like to get a 1st or 2nd generation Glock 17.

CountGlockula
December 5, 2007, 06:51 PM
Interesting thoughts folks.

I don't really care about how much one gets more use/range time than the others, but it's always good to have more than two Glocks...right?

jlbraun
December 5, 2007, 06:52 PM
"Collecting" Glocks is kinda like "collecting" pine 2x4s.

BamBam-31
December 5, 2007, 07:10 PM
Hell yeah!! :D :D

revolverman357
December 5, 2007, 08:03 PM
I'm thinking of getting a Glock 26. Is it too small to be comfortably
shootable?

TRP1
December 5, 2007, 09:00 PM
No Glock collection is complete without the 17 longslide and the 24C longslide.

tydephan
December 5, 2007, 09:34 PM
Is it too small to be comfortably
shootable?

Absolutely not. It's a great gun.

To the Count, I respond:

Collect, my man, collect. I would start by collecting each size in a given caliber. I started this with the G22. Unfortunately, I was bitten by the G26 bug and had to have one, which was then followed up by a G19. Now, because the G22 was a gift from my father, I cannot get rid of it in favor of the G17. So...unfortunately I'm invested in collecting both 9mm and .40cal glocks.

My glock collecting habit has been put on hold though, in favor of the M&P. I'm only missing one as we speak (M&P40c).

The only problem is I don't know what to do with all these evil black guns. :D

rwschill
December 5, 2007, 09:54 PM
I would go for a sub-compact, in this case the G27. Lot of flexibility with mags and ammo with this and the G35 and G23. I am doing the same in 9MM.
Some will differ, but the nicest is the G34/35 imo.

CountGlockula
December 5, 2007, 09:56 PM
Collect, my man, collect.

That pretty much sums it up!

Autolycus
December 5, 2007, 10:01 PM
I would stick with one caliber. Enjoy your Glocks.

The Lone Haranguer
December 5, 2007, 11:36 PM
I don't feel the need to do this, but if you collected a single example of each caliber on each frame size and other changes made to the design (e.g., types of checkering, finger grooves or not, accessory rail or not) over the years, you would have a pretty good-sized collection.

Squidward
December 6, 2007, 12:00 AM
I'm in favor of compartmentalizing. First "collect" all of the 40 cals. Then if you like, collect all of the whatever you want next.

ABBOBERG
December 6, 2007, 12:14 AM
This is the second time time this week I've seen a thread wherein someone disparages the idea of "collecting" the things they want rather than things that will appreciate in value.

I hope you are not insinuating that Glocks will not appreciate in value. Whoever thought those metal Flintstones or Beatles lunch boxes in the '60s would ever be worth anything? I wish I'd bought and preserved a bunch of those......

I think any gun collection will increase in value after a national gun ban (heaven forbid). If that ever happens, a lot of people would wish they had a collection....

Snarlingiron
December 6, 2007, 12:49 AM
Is it too small to be comfortably shootable?

Absolutely not. It only takes a couple of magazines to get past the hanging pinky thing. Or, if you just can't get past it get a couple of Glock 12 round magazines.

SDDL-UP
December 6, 2007, 01:12 AM
Glocks are fine guns but I don't see why you would bother collecting them.

Nothing different or outstanding about them except size. To me it would be like collecting bricks, fun bricks, but just bricks.

Now something like 1911's or Hi-Powers or CZ's there are so many variations it can make collecting fun but Glocks just don't do fill that niche for me.

Constantine-p89
December 6, 2007, 01:14 AM
Glock 22 is a outstanding gun and you should consider getting the model 21.

Prince Yamato
December 6, 2007, 02:29 AM
Is it too small to be comfortably
shootable?

Hell no. I just bought one after mulling about Glocks for 2 years. I swear it's one of the most accurate pistols I've ever shot. It can be shot one-handed, very easily.

CPshooter
December 6, 2007, 03:44 PM
Is it too small to be comfortably
shootable?

not at all. i had a G27, and it started to hurt after 3-4 mags of ammo. That was with the +1 Pearce pinky extension too..the .40 is just alot to handle without a full grip. my G19 and my buddies G26 are a breeze to shoot compared to the 27. glock + 9mm = perfect marriage

possum
December 6, 2007, 05:18 PM
i am in the same boat with xd's and i plan to own more than the 2 that i already have. i have the service and sc .40 and need the tactical mdel to make the .40 xd collection complete. so i say get em all, but i personally would go with the 9mm models, i always thought t would be cool to have a 17, 19, and a 26!

moph759fl
December 6, 2007, 05:35 PM
What no Glock 33 shooters ?

wditto
December 6, 2007, 05:50 PM
get the Long Slide.....get the Long Slide.....get the Long Slide.....

BamBam-31
December 6, 2007, 09:07 PM
Actually, I'm really tempted to buy the 26. Would go nicely with my 34, 17, and 19. :)

Don Lu
December 6, 2007, 10:05 PM
Glock 20....

Geno
December 6, 2007, 10:13 PM
Count:

A G21-SF followed me home today! Santa, you know. Current count:

G17
G17 America's Heroes
G19C
G21-SF

Doc2005

mseiferth
December 6, 2007, 11:00 PM
Here's my "collection" as of today...

G17
G22
G20 (best of the bunch):cool:

Keep that collection growing CountGlockula:evil:

MustangHowie
December 7, 2007, 09:21 AM
I don't see a problem with collecting Glocks. If you buy all used they won't be dropping in value like others have mentioned, they will only drop so far from new prices.

If you don't want a different caliber I would collect by model and by generation.

If you want a different caliber you might keep it to one generation. ( I would get all 2nd gen personally)

Collecting things just to be able to make a profit later takes a lot of the fun out of collecting. Collect what you like not what you think will support your retirement, that is what investing is for.

Dravur
December 7, 2007, 11:31 AM
"Collecting" Glocks is kinda like "collecting" pine 2x4s

well, isn't that special... Except for an SKS, Ive never shot a 2x4. But, if he wants to collect Glocks, great.

I have a Glock collection, and I like the guns. reliable, simple, elegant.

It always amazes me the disparaging remarks people make when someone wants to chat about their hobby, but the gun isn't good enough for some snobs. Their nose goes in the air so high that if it rains, they drown. Time to get that picklectomy, salute the OP for enjoying his hobby and say... get a Glock!

Heck, get a bunch of Glocks! Have one hard chromed, paint one with Duracoat.. Do a torture test on one. have fun with your collection and don't let the snobs ruin it for you.

bb21
December 7, 2007, 01:21 PM
I don't own a Glock they don't fit my had the best, but I may choose one in the future and do some mods to make it fit. I would 2nd the suggestion of buying used if you can, Glock is one manufacturer that has proven it's reliability and as long as you go through a store that you trust you should be fine, after 3 used Glocks you could add a fourth for the price saved on not buying new and it sounds like you'll be buying lots more. I would go with a 19 or 17 but also look hard into the longslide models. Have fun and let us know.
Good Luck and Be Safe!

ewayte
December 7, 2007, 01:51 PM
What no Glock 33 shooters ?

I have one and plan on completing the .357 family. I'm working my way up starting with the baby bear.

PhillyGlocker
December 7, 2007, 09:15 PM
I'm still early in my collection. I have a Glock 26 and G33. I had a G19 Homeland Defender, but had to sell it for the cash. I'm financially back on track now, so I'll be replacing the G19 soon. After that, I'll be after a G17.

If you enjoyed reading about "Should I or Shouldn't I: Glock collecting!" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!