Beretta 92 vs. Beretta 90-two


PDA






Soldier0117
December 5, 2007, 09:13 PM
Hi everyone I was wondering if thre were really any major differences between the Beretta 92 and the 90-two considering that they are like the same pistol with different features. Does the 90-two really have any improvements over the 92, I know the changeable grips are a good new feature but the 92 felt good in my hands anyway so grips aren't a concern. So other than that is there anything better? Thanks.

If you enjoyed reading about "Beretta 92 vs. Beretta 90-two" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
hankdatank1362
December 5, 2007, 09:17 PM
The 90-two is just a little too uber-tactical for me. Kinda like that 8-shot .357 S&W revolver with the light rail. There is a line, and sometimes, gun companies cross it.

Slater
December 5, 2007, 09:19 PM
I think the 90-TWO has some sort of recoil buffer installed.

Soldier0117
December 5, 2007, 09:23 PM
I myself thought it was almost a little too beefed up looking.

alucard0822
December 5, 2007, 11:04 PM
Better sights, very comfortable and accurate, but that goofy looking platic block under the dustcover kinda looks crappy. I have shot both, ended up getting the 92FS, better availability of parts, shoots great, and looks better IMO

10-Ring
December 6, 2007, 01:00 AM
The only differences I've seen are the light rail w/ cover, the grip's adjustability & the stock 17 round mags (that fit the 92fs by the way)...They feel very similar but I still prefer the 92fs...but I wouldn't mind having some of those 17 round mags tho :D

If you enjoyed reading about "Beretta 92 vs. Beretta 90-two" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!