Wildalaska
July 27, 2003, 12:32 AM
To all of those who live in less enlightened areas...heres a letter form one of our State Reps to the newspaper...
Daily News Letters
(Published: July 26, 2003)
Rep. Croft stands by decisions on concealed guns, Permanent Fund
When I started in the Legislature, a good friend told me that government should be "liberal with our rights, conservative with our money."
Recently, my legislative actions on constitutional rights and the people's money have come under fire from editorials printed in this paper. An ADN editorial on June 16 did not like my defense of Second Amendment rights in Alaska, in particular allowing Alaskans to carry a gun generally without government permission or precondition. Earlier, a Voice of the Times editorial did not like my defense of the Permanent Fund dividend, particularly the idea of requiring a vote of the people before any change in the dividend.
After giving it some thought, I stand by both positions and, in fact, see them as related. The Alaska Constitution guarantees our individual gun rights and states that our natural resources are held in common by the people. Individuals can forfeit their gun rights by their conduct -- committing a felony, for example -- and Alaskans may decide to let the government use some of the dividend money for other purposes. But the point is that the people start with the right or the money, and these things only get in the government's hands by conduct or consent. My actions last session tried to put the dividend and our Second Amendment rights in the hands of the people first. I stand by them.
-- Rep. Eric Croft
Anchorage
Daily News Letters
(Published: July 26, 2003)
Rep. Croft stands by decisions on concealed guns, Permanent Fund
When I started in the Legislature, a good friend told me that government should be "liberal with our rights, conservative with our money."
Recently, my legislative actions on constitutional rights and the people's money have come under fire from editorials printed in this paper. An ADN editorial on June 16 did not like my defense of Second Amendment rights in Alaska, in particular allowing Alaskans to carry a gun generally without government permission or precondition. Earlier, a Voice of the Times editorial did not like my defense of the Permanent Fund dividend, particularly the idea of requiring a vote of the people before any change in the dividend.
After giving it some thought, I stand by both positions and, in fact, see them as related. The Alaska Constitution guarantees our individual gun rights and states that our natural resources are held in common by the people. Individuals can forfeit their gun rights by their conduct -- committing a felony, for example -- and Alaskans may decide to let the government use some of the dividend money for other purposes. But the point is that the people start with the right or the money, and these things only get in the government's hands by conduct or consent. My actions last session tried to put the dividend and our Second Amendment rights in the hands of the people first. I stand by them.
-- Rep. Eric Croft
Anchorage