Barrel length
aji
January 6, 2008, 09:20 PM
I have a question regarding designation of barrel length. Some articles define short barrel as anything under 4 inches, while other define it as 4 inches or less. What is the consensus? Thank you
If you enjoyed reading about "Barrel length" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Jimmie
January 6, 2008, 09:27 PM
??? So you're asking if exactly 4" is short? My Sig is 3.9" and I wouldn't call it short. It's no snubbie.
DMZ
January 7, 2008, 12:10 AM
2" is short :(
4" is long :cool:
3" is just right :D
MachIVshooter
January 7, 2008, 02:41 AM
IMO, <4" is short for most handguns. That said, 3.5-4" is on the longer side for .32's and .380's.
The Bushmaster
January 7, 2008, 11:48 AM
DMZ...How about splitting the difference with 2 1/2"?
spwenger
January 7, 2008, 07:47 PM
...the snubby category was 2 1/2" or less.
The last issue revolvers of the FBI were 3" S&W M-13's and M-65's, a very nice length for a defensive revolver, so long as you're not too short-waisted to clear the holster easily.
DMZ
January 7, 2008, 10:48 PM
DMZ...How about splitting the difference with 2 1/2"?
Actually, I have a 2 1/2" .38 Spl in mind real soon.
Seiko
January 7, 2008, 11:55 PM
I think it has to do more with the gun then anything to be honest.
I have a 4" J frame 36 target. It looks long because of such a small frame.
On the other side, I have a 658 N frame with a 3" barrel and because of the big frame, it looks tiny as hell.
That said 4" is normal any thing under is "short" anything over is "long" and 15" dan wessons are just stupid:neener:
bang_bang
January 8, 2008, 12:18 AM
I take offense to that...
Not really, I see where your coming from though. I'd say anything under a 4 inch barrel would be considered short, and anything above 4 inches is a longer, more sporty type barrel.
http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii15/bang_bang_photo/DSC00060.jpg
Mad Magyar
January 8, 2008, 07:33 AM
Some consider anything under 4.25" "short" in terms of reliability...
Damn, I hope Tuner isn't reading this....:D
MASTEROFMALICE
January 8, 2008, 07:48 AM
I would say it depends on the load being fired.
If it's something like a .357 which requires a decent length barrel to get velocity up then 4" would be short.
DMK
January 8, 2008, 08:07 AM
I would consider a short barrel to be anything under 4". Below that velocity seems to drop off pretty noticeably with most calibers.
Few folks would buy a handgun with less that a 4" barrel unless they wanted to conceal it.
Most service/duty sidearms had/have approximately 4" barrels (give or take 1/2"). These days some police sidearms are even going as low as 3.5". The 1911 being one exception with its 5" barrel.
If you enjoyed reading about "Barrel length" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.