sigsmoker
January 24, 2008, 04:24 PM
Hello all, I would appreciate some feedback on this situation. If anyone owns one of these and has done what I would like to do, I would appreciate your how to answer.
I have two problems
A. The rear sight should probably be removed because I am going to use a scope. Secondly, it is rather cheesy anyway, it came new in the box aiming way off to one side. I wonder if it is a dovetail base and is just knocked into the dovetail a little crooked. It is so low, I cannot see a dovetail. To me it even looks like it is clamped in but I am sure I need to knock it out with something and don't know which direction to punch it off from.
I will save it with the literature and box, but even if I were not using a scope, I would rather have a real rear sight put on. What a chunk of junk the sight is.
B. I see there are two grooves atop the receiver that run along about 4 inches maybe, so that I could either maybe mount a rail base then mount regular weaver rings on top of it or buy a pair of 3/8 dovetail rings and mount them directly in the grooves.
My theory is a base would be a much better mount and more stable and secure than a ring here and a ring there.
One good whack and I would think that the ring would break or pop off or the ledges on the receiver itself would chip or get boogered off.
So what size are the grooves? Is it a 3/8 or 11 mm dovetail base already? Looks rather thin to me.
The rest of the rifle seems to be a winner. I have a .17 HMR with the same action and that has a thumbhole stock and a heavy barrel, but I wanted the .22 mag to carry in the woods.
Thank you for your time and thoughts.
I have two problems
A. The rear sight should probably be removed because I am going to use a scope. Secondly, it is rather cheesy anyway, it came new in the box aiming way off to one side. I wonder if it is a dovetail base and is just knocked into the dovetail a little crooked. It is so low, I cannot see a dovetail. To me it even looks like it is clamped in but I am sure I need to knock it out with something and don't know which direction to punch it off from.
I will save it with the literature and box, but even if I were not using a scope, I would rather have a real rear sight put on. What a chunk of junk the sight is.
B. I see there are two grooves atop the receiver that run along about 4 inches maybe, so that I could either maybe mount a rail base then mount regular weaver rings on top of it or buy a pair of 3/8 dovetail rings and mount them directly in the grooves.
My theory is a base would be a much better mount and more stable and secure than a ring here and a ring there.
One good whack and I would think that the ring would break or pop off or the ledges on the receiver itself would chip or get boogered off.
So what size are the grooves? Is it a 3/8 or 11 mm dovetail base already? Looks rather thin to me.
The rest of the rifle seems to be a winner. I have a .17 HMR with the same action and that has a thumbhole stock and a heavy barrel, but I wanted the .22 mag to carry in the woods.
Thank you for your time and thoughts.