Is this combo any good?
Phelptwan
February 21, 2008, 07:59 PM
Ok...so I've been searching around for a rifled barrel for my 870 express. First I was wondering how good the Mossberg barrels are. I'm guessing just as good as any of the others.
Here's the ones I saw at CTD. http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/21585-54067-706.html
I was also wondering if a scope on a shotgun is worth it, and if this is any good.
http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/21585-54067-706.html
Or is there another recommended barrel for a decent price (around $150)? Basically will just be deer hunting with it, looking for a rifled barrel.
If you enjoyed reading about "Is this combo any good?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Dave McCracken
February 22, 2008, 10:08 AM
The Mossberg stuff seems OK.
Cheap scopes rarely last on shotguns.
And, at typical Eastern ranges, even a bead works OK. I'd get open sights or dedicate the weapon to slugs and mount a peep and appropriate front sight.
And with all respect, I've seen more folks hunting that need to learn to get closer than shoot further.
TrapperReady
February 22, 2008, 10:36 AM
I'm not opposed to scopes on a shotgun, but I don't like 3-9x adjustables. IMO, those belong on rifles. For a shotgun, I like low-magnification (preferably fixed-power scopes). Think of it more as a precise method to aim, instead of trying to magnify and get "up close and personal" with the target.
One good friend had a string of buck-fever misses until he mounted a 1.5x fixed scope on his shotgun. Since then, he's not missed. Before, he would find himself concentrating on the size of the deer's antlers, and not really setting up for a good shot. The scope makes him really focus on the shot.
Personally, I prefer a good peep sight, but scopes can serve a similar purpose. My concern with the higher-magnification versions is that it can be too easy to think "Well, I can see it... I bet I could hit it." when the shot is truly out of effective range.
TrapperReady
February 22, 2008, 10:39 AM
I'm not opposed to scopes on a shotgun, but I don't like 3-9x adjustables. IMO, those belong on rifles. For a shotgun, I like low-magnification (preferably fixed-power scopes). Think of it more as a precise method to aim, instead of trying to magnify and get "up close and personal" with the target.
One good friend had a string of buck-fever misses until he mounted a 1.5x fixed scope on his shotgun. Since then, he's not missed. Before, he would find himself concentrating on the size of the deer's antlers, and not really setting up for a good shot. The scope makes him really focus on the shot.
Personally, I prefer a good peep sight, but scopes can serve a similar purpose. My concern with the higher-magnification versions is that it can be too easy to think "Well, I can see it... I bet I could hit it." when the shot is truly out of effective range.
coyotehitman
February 22, 2008, 11:04 AM
Dick's runs a 500 combo 12 or 20 with a VR barrel, cantilever rifled slug barrel, two cheek rests, and scope for 249.99 almost yearly during the deer season. So, for a little more than a Remington barrel, you get much more.
foghornl
February 22, 2008, 12:44 PM
I saw a really 'not so useful, IMHO' setup...a 4-12x40 scope mounted up on a shotgun.
4x is [again, in my humble opinion] right on the verge of too much, but this guy had it cranked up to 12x.
My shotgun only has the front bead.
chas08
February 22, 2008, 01:02 PM
I have a 18 in Riot "Mossy" replacement barrel on an old 870 express I keep under the bed for HD. I even killed a deer with it in Illinois a few years ago with a B-Square reciever mount and a fixed 2X scope. It has seen a lot of bird and buckshot just playing around and has worked just fine with no function issues.
If you enjoyed reading about "Is this combo any good?" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join
TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.