Let the Military Protect Airports


PDA






Jeff White
August 8, 2003, 03:24 PM
If I were as afraid of everything as Stanley Crouch obviously is, I'd never leave my room.....

Jeff


New York Daily News
August 7, 2003

Let The Military Protect Airports

By Stanley Crouch

We are just five weeks from the second anniversary of the day when Islamic terrorists split American history into two parts: before 9/11 and after 9/11. We have seen much change, and we have had to rethink many things that were once taken for granted.

In the early 1960s, planes were hijacked now and again and taken to Cuba. In the late '60s, those sympathetic to the Palestinian cause were lifting planes and making demands - that is, when they weren't murdering Israeli athletes or blowing up cafes in Paris and other such places with the assistance of European leftists ever ready to talk themselves into lunatic plots and ideas about Third World revolution and the downfall of the West.

For a bit, we seemed to get over all that. There seemed to be a reduction in such violent acts, and the security measures taken at airports appeared to make skyjackings a rarity. But the events of 9/11 shattered the illusion that we were doing enough, that we had made ourselves safe.

On that unforgettable September morning in the fall of 2001, one year into the new millennium, we came to know what people feel when terrorism comes into their lives. As usual, being America, we got the biggest dose ever, the successful destruction of the twin towers by the same group that had tried to bring them down a few years earlier. Hijacked planes were used as weapons, and 3,000 people were murdered. Nineteen men, most of them from Saudi Arabia, had slaughtered their way into history.

Since then, we have been trying to make it harder - if not impossible - for such actions to take place again. I, for one, have advocated a 10-year moratorium on immigration from Islamic countries, primarily because, being a black American, I have no sentimental attachment to the idea of America's being an immigrant nation. Tell that one to the birds.

Immigration is not a right. It is a decision on the part of the country in which the foreigner wants to live.

Somehow, the American descendants of immigrants seem to get that confused at the very worst time and act as if a sensible restraint on one particular group was an attack on all.

We are now faced with the expensive demands of improving airline security. That, it seems to me, can be handled rather easily. I think it should be taken over by the military. In fact, those who enlist in the armed services should have the option of signing up for the homeland security effort as it pertains to travel, just as they now can volunteer for the paratroopers or Green Berets or other special units.

Potential terrorists would be much more likely to be frightened off - or captured - if armed and trained people were scanning the carry-on bags, checking identification, working with the dogs in the baggage department and riding on planes ready to take care of whatever business is at hand.

Using military personnel to guarantee the safety of air travel would be a savings, too. The level of armed forces pay scales is obviously much lower than that of civilian workers.

Airline unions would go through the roof, but the public would not. It would cause a bit of unfortunate pain, but we would all feel safer and, most importantly, would be safer.

If you enjoyed reading about "Let the Military Protect Airports" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
bogie
August 8, 2003, 03:43 PM
So many people are missing what should be obvious: We don't need to protect airports. We don't need to protect airplanes, other than against missile attack.

.45Ruger
August 8, 2003, 04:13 PM
To me this idea is on par with forcing the military to patrol the border to combat illigal aliens. These are not the reason we have a military. The military exists with a set mission in mind. When you cloud the issue the new mission doesn't get done, and the old one suffers as well. The military is all ready straining to accomplish it's tasks with the manpower at hand and this crap is not something they need. Quite simply if terrorists new that if they boarded a flight intent on harm and between 5 and 10 percent of the passangers were carying firearms, they would get a new plan.

jason10mm
August 8, 2003, 04:37 PM
Yet another doofus who advocates using the military for a police action.

Actually, I think if we let any American who killed an illegal immigrant within 5 miles of our side of the border get a free pass on murder charges, we would have more than enough volunteers to patrol the border. I wouldn't go camping near it for fear of being shot, but neither could coyotes easily cross over without making the venture so expensive as to be impractical.

MicroBalrog
August 8, 2003, 04:46 PM
We've got IDF troops with M-16's at the entrance to Ben-Gurion. Works fine.

I really don't see what's all the great fuss about.

SelfProclaimedExpert
August 8, 2003, 04:47 PM
Not only does this yokel not understand federal law on the use of military for LE roles, he has no idea what even an underpaided soldier costs. So while he's volunteering active duty for extra BS, the active duty people are being internally replaced with contract workers wherever feasible.

This guy isn't considered a big time journalist, is he?

Standing Wolf
August 8, 2003, 04:49 PM
I think we should use military personnel to patrol the nation's borders; as for airports, however, I'd say not.

dinosaur
August 8, 2003, 04:55 PM
Ole Stan`s a NY regular. I used to think he had a brain tumor because once in a Blue Moon he`d come up with a decent idea. :uhoh: This isn`t one of them. :barf:

Jeff White
August 8, 2003, 05:02 PM
He hasn't got a clue. I feel for him. If September 11th, 2001 was the most significant day in his life, he can't have had much of a life.

Like all other blissninnys he wants to place responsibility for his safety in the hands of others so that he doesn't have to worry about it. Like so many others he thinks that our military is just sitting around the barracks, sucking up tax dollars and looking for something to do. Where does he think the additional troops will come from? :banghead: Doesn't he watch the news? Hey Stan, ever hear about this little thing going on in Iraq these days? :cuss:

Arm the flight crews and stop worrying. They got away with making cruise missiles out of airliners one time because the passengers were all conditoned that the best way to react to a hijacking was to sit back and enjoy the ride. Does anyone really believe that the passengers would sit still for that again? It didn't even totally succeed on September 11th. On one aircraft the passengers realized what was happening and revolted. That plan never made it's objective. It's a bigger tactical problem now. The hijackers have to contend with controlling a hundred or more passengers who will feel they have nothing to lose one way or the other. Kind of a tough tactical problem given the kinds of weapons they could board with. Of course if all the passengers were like Mr. Crouch, you could hijack a plane with your finger in your pocket, pretending you were armed.

Jeff

If you enjoyed reading about "Let the Military Protect Airports" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!