View Full Version : Difference between Robar's NP3 finish and hard chrome?
DevilDog0402
April 19, 2008, 06:10 PM
Is there a difference? Is one better (more durable/corrosion resistant) than the other?
I'm thinking of getting a a couple slides/barrels done.
CWL
April 19, 2008, 06:47 PM
Hard chrome is much harder and protects metal against abrasion & wear while NP3 protects against corrosive agents like water & salt.
Hardchrome has RC hardness of 70+ while Robar is RC 48-51.
Black Majik
April 19, 2008, 08:02 PM
NP3 is also a slippery finish, so handle a pistol that has been NP3'ed before deciding on it. It can make or break your decision.
DevilDog0402
April 19, 2008, 09:41 PM
Just the difference in RC makes me want to go with the hard chrome. Thanks for the info CWL.
Warner
April 19, 2008, 09:58 PM
Try cost too, DevilDog0402.
Recently I looked into getting a more durable finish on some of my Mini-14 mags.
Robar's NP3 was FOUR TIMES more per mag than hard chrome from another well regarded place ($30 vs $7 each).
W
SHOOT1SAM
April 19, 2008, 11:31 PM
Well,
Depends on what you want.
Hardchrome is harder, however, Np3 is more corrosion resistant, as well as more slippery, as in self-lubricating, and lends itself to much easier cleaning.
If the hardchrome chips or flakes, corrosion is very able to penetrate underneath it; not so with Np3.
Np3 comes with a lifetime warranty; I don't know about hardchrome.
Sam
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.