We have old and New guns


PDA






myrifle
April 28, 2008, 08:56 PM
And we have alot of them with pictures @ www.downsouthhunting.com
inside the gun room

If you enjoyed reading about "We have old and New guns" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!
Superlite27
April 28, 2008, 10:17 PM
Why not just say, "We have guns"?

If you have both old and new guns, that pretty much encompasses everything.


It's like saying, "I like being inside and outside". This pretty much sums up everywhere doesn't it?

Bazooka Joe71
April 28, 2008, 10:21 PM
And the point of this thread is?



You now owe me 30 seconds.

Kind of Blued
April 28, 2008, 10:43 PM
This thread blows.

sarduy
April 28, 2008, 10:45 PM
adds.... lol

mnrivrat
April 28, 2008, 10:47 PM
Good Plug ! :D

heritageguy
April 28, 2008, 10:48 PM
MMMM! SPAM!!!

never_retreat
April 28, 2008, 11:00 PM
In before the lock.
What is this a plug for another website or a business? doesn't load up right for me.

Mr White
April 28, 2008, 11:11 PM
You could at least let people lurk.

I'd lurk around and check things out and if I liked it, I'd register. But it doesn't look like I have that option so I guess I don't go back to your site. Bummer. It looked decent. Good luck with it.

Kitchen_Duty
April 28, 2008, 11:37 PM
Spam!!!! Did I hear someone say spam:
http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a213/crazyguy7007/spamboy.jpg

Pax Jordana
April 28, 2008, 11:43 PM
This reminds me of the dinosaur comic in french where the dinosaur says "j'aime des choses et d'autres choses"

or, I like the things and the other things.

The question is, is it lockable?

CWL
April 29, 2008, 12:54 AM
Poachers used to be shot on sight.

Bazooka Joe71
April 29, 2008, 12:59 AM
I've got five bucks that says myrifle never posts here again(barring mods locking his/her account)...Any takers?

Claude Clay
April 29, 2008, 01:02 AM
1st post.....shame on you.

Robert Hairless
April 29, 2008, 01:11 AM
Why not just say, "We have guns"?

If you have both old and new guns, that pretty much encompasses everything.


It's like saying, "I like being inside and outside". This pretty much sums up everywhere doesn't it?

All true. But isn't it equally true that he would not have posted unless he did have guns? So the word "have" is redundant, and the message could have been more efficiently phrased as "We guns."

But who else could he mean? So there's no need for the "We" either. All he had to say was "Guns."

Anyone who takes the proper perspective, though, and shrugs off all vestiges of a false consciousness, should immediately see that a message posted in a section entitled "General Gun Discussions" would be about guns. That word should be dropped too.

In fact the message would be most effective and efficient if it had no words at all. It is one of those communications in which the essential quality is its very intangibility, which is destroyed as soon as it is posted.

Dksimon
April 29, 2008, 01:12 AM
if you have old and new guns do you also carry not-so-old-guns?

Winchester 73
April 29, 2008, 01:18 AM
In fact the message would be most effective and efficient if it had no words at all. It is one of those communications in which the essential quality is its very intangibility, which is destroyed as soon as it is posted.

That's the most cogent paragraph I've ever read.Except if it had never been posted ,it would have had even more meaning.:)

Sage of Seattle
April 29, 2008, 01:44 AM
Why not just say, "We have guns"?

If you have both old and new guns, that pretty much encompasses everything.


It's like saying, "I like being inside and outside". This pretty much sums up everywhere doesn't it?

I'm just wondering in what kind of room one might find these guns...




(IBTL)

hacksaw
April 29, 2008, 09:07 AM
IBTL! Website must be hosted on a commodore 64..P.O.S. wouldn't load.

Sans Authoritas
April 29, 2008, 09:12 AM
Why not just say, "We have guns"?

If you have both old and new guns, that pretty much encompasses everything.

It's like saying, "I like being inside and outside". This pretty much sums up everywhere doesn't it?

Robert Hairless wrote: All true. But isn't it equally true that he would not have posted unless he did have guns? So the word "have" is redundant, and the message could have been more efficiently phrased as "We guns."

But who else could he mean? So there's no need for the "We" either. All he had to say was "Guns."

Anyone who takes the proper perspective, though, and shrugs off all vestiges of a false consciousness, should immediately see that a message posted in a section entitled "General Gun Discussions" would be about guns. That word should be dropped too.

In fact the message would be most effective and efficient if it had no words at all. It is one of those communications in which the essential quality is its very intangibility, which is destroyed as soon as it is posted.

Like, whoah, man. That's like, this book I read once . . . written by this guy . . . ; )

-Sans Authoritas

Henry Bowman
April 29, 2008, 09:26 AM
Welcome to The High Road. Please look around before posting an add for another site or business. here is an example of how to share the fact that you are operating a business that may be of interest to the members here: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=357912. Your first post on the other hand, is spam.

If you enjoyed reading about "We have old and New guns" here in TheHighRoad.org archive, you'll LOVE our community. Come join TheHighRoad.org today for the full version!