Seeker
January 13, 2003, 02:47 AM
The latest thing I've heard on the news re: North Korea is that they have threatened us with a 'sea of fire', and now there is talk of 'addressing their energy shortages' (per this article (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=578&e=1&cid=578&u=/nm/20030113/ts_nm/korea_north_dc) ).
I thought the US didn't negotiate with terrorists! I say give'm nada. And if they take that as an act of war - fine!
How many of us would make ourselves the victims of armed robbery, why should the US submit to armed robbery (not to mention the pecedent this would set - if your country is a little short just play the nuke card and the US will deliver!).
This makes me hopping mad that our country would even think to give this third-rate belligerent country anything other than a a cold shoulder.
I think there is a difference between Iraq and North Korea in that SaDamn has threaten the mother of all battles if Iraq is invaded. N. Korea has threaten a sea of fire if we don't start sending them oil again.
I thought the US didn't negotiate with terrorists! I say give'm nada. And if they take that as an act of war - fine!
How many of us would make ourselves the victims of armed robbery, why should the US submit to armed robbery (not to mention the pecedent this would set - if your country is a little short just play the nuke card and the US will deliver!).
This makes me hopping mad that our country would even think to give this third-rate belligerent country anything other than a a cold shoulder.
I think there is a difference between Iraq and North Korea in that SaDamn has threaten the mother of all battles if Iraq is invaded. N. Korea has threaten a sea of fire if we don't start sending them oil again.