cjanak
June 11, 2008, 05:19 PM
I recently purchased my first rifle, a Ruger M77R MKII (http://www.shootingtimes.co.uk/guns/110341/Ruger_M77_Mk2_rifle_review.html) in 6.5 x 55 SE (http://www.fieldandstream.com/fieldstream/shooting/rifles/article/0,13199,461212,00.html). While researching which gun and caliber to go with, I came across several references to a study allegedly undertaken by Swedish Authorities that purports to show no material difference in effectiveness between the 30.06, .308 and 6.5x55 Swede with respect to Alg hunting (I think an Alg is a Moose that’s comparable in size to a North American Elk). I also noticed references to an apparently similar Finnish study. For example, references are here (http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost.php?p=1062532&postcount=22), here (http://www.beesource.com/forums/showpost.php?p=319641&postcount=18) and here (http://shootersforum.com/showpost.htm?p=200734&postcount=6).
Has anybody seen the original version of these studies? An English language version might not exist, but perhaps some of our Scandinavian brothers and sisters have laid their eyes on these documents?
I ask because I’m interested in learning more about the study, but also to feel confident that what I’ve read in this regard is actually true. You know how it is… reports/stories tend to get a life of their own sometimes, especially on the web. It’s hard to tell what to believe.
For example, you may have heard the oft repeated claim that Eskimos have 1000 words for snow. I’ve seen it plenty of times, most recently on a non-fiction TV show. However, that’s just not true (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eskimo_words_for_snow)! The truth is they have a few more or a few less words for snow than are contained in the English language, depending on which Eskimo language you’re talking about and how you define words.
Has anybody seen the original version of these studies? An English language version might not exist, but perhaps some of our Scandinavian brothers and sisters have laid their eyes on these documents?
I ask because I’m interested in learning more about the study, but also to feel confident that what I’ve read in this regard is actually true. You know how it is… reports/stories tend to get a life of their own sometimes, especially on the web. It’s hard to tell what to believe.
For example, you may have heard the oft repeated claim that Eskimos have 1000 words for snow. I’ve seen it plenty of times, most recently on a non-fiction TV show. However, that’s just not true (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eskimo_words_for_snow)! The truth is they have a few more or a few less words for snow than are contained in the English language, depending on which Eskimo language you’re talking about and how you define words.